>>22750

>>22780

understandable, but he said

"Defcon [1]" not

"Defcon 1"

vastly different meanings just like Q said

"10" &

"[10]"

>>22814

yeah. but he was highlighting that difference between 1 and [1]

>>22812

yeah when he said "10" that referred to 10 days, but [10] referred to the [10] marker in the 10 min difference between that Q post and POTUS tweet (Findable on here in several places)

DEFCON 1 is just as you say, Nuclear War Imminent

but DEFCON [1] means that the [1] marker or the 1 minute POTUS tweet difference is imminent.

also, i personally think that it illustrates that the storm is at a figurative DEFCON [1] status, similar to DEFCON 1 in the real world, but only applied to the storm.

>>22829

defcon 1 is nuclear

defcon [1] is not

>>22872

yeah.. people don't notice the []'s and go "REEE"

>>22934

yeah… as much as it sucks, it's important to point out the difference between 1 and [1]. even though its mostly noise.

>>22967

we're over the target methinks. defcon = lowhanging shill disruption target we need to be the calm in the storm i guess, even though it slides the board.