Okay, to preempt the shilling in this tread: Q said this:

>>21093

"Defcon [1]" not "Defcon 1"

this refers to the incoming [1] marker as a 1 minute interval between POTUS twitter posts and the storm itself moving to "Defcon [1]"

when Q said here:

>>20735

"Defcon 1, 4-10-20" he means Defcon 1 is the nuclear readiness protocol declared by POTUS

"[non-nuclear]" means "Defcon [1] is non-nuclear. its' similar to real world DC1 but only applied to the status of The Storm

EVERYBODY CALM YOUR TITS

>>23091

Maybe we've averted that particular artillery shilling?

>>23121

so he's going to drop and epic nuclear level truth bomb on the public, lending more meaning to the DC[1] condition. makes sense brosefus.

>>23213

Hey… See this:

>>23091

>>23236

I doubt an EMP in NK would have much of an effect… they shut off the juice most of the time anyways.

>>23345

see:

>>23091

>>23381

I don't think the [0] marker has happened yet. someone posted a possible [>1] marker, but that /= [0], does it?

>>23419

they should have hospitalized him after he made that incoherent cacophonic noise he calls music.

>>23503

If you'll look. I was addressing the starving of the citizens. It'll make little difference to them. I didn't speak to military targets. Lurk Moar before you put words in other people's mouths.

>>23543

agree. might have to do with death sentences for speaking out, labor camps, imprisoning your whole family and 3 more generations. yeah, though. NK needs a good revolution.

>>23570

I think that's the plausible scenario.

>>23580

Thanks Q, We've been battling that ever since… Godspeed