DEFCON 1 = "COCKED PISTOL. Nuclear war is imminent. Maximum readiness."
Is DEFCON [1] different?
Okay… Not meant to signify AUTH or that DEFCON 1 has been established, but to teach us to understand…?
But, there is no word missing "Q". Just two different words, one which has a "Q" and not the other.
Just explain it, if you know…
Righteous graphics, anon! Thank you for your hard work!
AF1 is a sky fortress.
Fuck… Does this mean I have to go back over ALL of the maps again?
Thanks… Agreed. Thought the same thing.
"[non-nuclear] - Q"
Let's hope so anyway. That's a BOLD term to be throwing around. Especially, after POTUS just had a nuclear dick-measuring contest with NK.
Flynn is a good man, a trust-seeker and a truth-speaker. And POTUS vouches for him, as well. I trust him, Ma'am.
Dingo… ;)
No… The Zuma Payload is a skinny-ass little rocket made by Space-X. Not a flying-fortress in the sky. Ya'll need to descend in altitude, stat.
"Bing. Bong. Boom." - POTUS
Nah, lurk back to the Q post that mentioned "[non-nuclear]". Everything has meaning. Future proves past. (God, we sound like a fucking cult sometimes).
No [0] yet that has been noted.
We're currently at [1] time-stamp difference from Q to POTUS/POTUS to POTUS posts. However, now having the "key" to the "map" (map-key), we can go back through the Q maps and compare with Tweets. And the future should prove the past in many instances.
Follow?
Wait… what?
The graphic you posted shows a [1] difference, not a [0] difference. I don't think [0] has happened yet. Unless, being WITHIN one minute counts. However, based on the other examples we've been given, we would expect it to be the same minute time-stamp.
Good explanation, namefag. Thank you.
I'm thinking DEFCON [1], though non-nuclear, may signify a non-nuclear strike by /our guys/ that is of nuclear proportions.
Nobody say "Tick, tock", or you'll be banished to the bog of eternal stench.
How much sand is that fucker, JA?
Because of the bouncing around in sequence, which some other mathfag can get into to see if there's something there, it seems that these may just be time-stamps to look for. Perhaps, rated in importance? Hence, [1] being called DEFCON [1]?
Perhaps, [5] references DEFCON [5}?…
"[non-nuclear]".
The next question is, is this a reference to an attack in offense, or defense? Could this reference a biological attack or otherwise catastrophic-attack that is [non-nuclear]? Or is it merely a simple time-reference, which has no implications of "nuclear" proportions, though they be [non-nuclear]?
Much to ponder here.