>>23079

I was thinking the same, but then I asked myself why we would get the 15 marker after 10 and 5, but before 1, while we wait for 0. Perhaps we missed the 15 in the past.

>>23218

So, I would think that simultaneous posts by Q and Trump would be signify a major event, even without the countdown. I suppose the countdown tells us when the storm is hitting, but instead of the countdown, Trump and Q could have posted the same message to signal the start. I suppose that would eliminate plausible deniability of Trump involvement, but Q tonight said the markers were to be used as proof of this board's legitimacy to friends, family that we redpill. So I'm unsure of the countdown's purpose(s). Maybe I'm overthinking it.

My other observation is obvious that if we haven't found the past 15, and Q has already given us a new 15 and brought us to 1, then the content of the messages of the markers is not a clue to the timing of the countdown, and since Q had to spoon feed us, [0] is likely happening soon.

>>23447

I don't think [0] meant that Trump or Q were done posting; I think it means that we're waiting on simultaneous messages

Q listed "15, 10, 5, 1" but kept zero in brackets.

>>23626

Kek, just what I was thinking!