Anonymous ID: d38b7d Jan. 7, 2018, 10:02 p.m. No.23073   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23031

It works here, DEFCON gets our attention to look out for "1", but if he wanted to draw our attention to a different number, say 6 or -39 or 3.14, this code would not work. DEFCON [3.14] doesn't feel right.

Anonymous ID: d38b7d Jan. 7, 2018, 10:39 p.m. No.23404   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23350

That "seven trillion" number again, this time as how much we've spent in the middle east. The other time it seemed to be the total we would get back from SA and Soros and someone else.

Anonymous ID: d38b7d Jan. 7, 2018, 10:46 p.m. No.23469   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3476 >>3670

Related to earlier (probably Saturday) post about aborted baby cells being in Pepsi, here's the Natural News article:

 

https:// www.naturalnews.com/049367_aborted_babies_flavor_chemicals_food_corporations.html

 

The title is dishonest. There's no connection between the aborted baby cells and anything that goes into the Pepsi, none. The aborted baby cells are used to develop a test of the stuff they put in the Pepsi, to see if it'll upset your stomach or something like that. Just to build the testing apparatus, not to go into the Pepsi itself.

Anonymous ID: d38b7d Jan. 7, 2018, 10:48 p.m. No.23486   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3524

>>23458

Probably not, but I think this whole DEFCON discussion is vague enough (we still can't figure it out really) that it might have been some of that necessary disinformation.

Anonymous ID: d38b7d Jan. 7, 2018, 10:50 p.m. No.23502   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23476

Right, NN has its issues, and dishonest labeling like this is one of them. But some anon then used it to confirm another source also saying that aborted baby cells were going into Pepsi, a point that was being argued.