>>25246

Great job with these graphics!

I'm just wondering if we're missing something? Sometimes, we use [X] to be the time differential in POTUS' tweets (e.g., 15 and 1 min) and sometimes (like here) we use it to refer to a subject of the tweet. Would Q really be this inconsistent?

Plus, what is the purpose of matching up Q's posts and POTUS' tweets? Just to confirm Q is legit for normies? Why? What purpose would that serve? I feel like there's more here. Maybe a secret message that we're supposed to be relaying to normies? Maybe something to start to make them question the MSM? Or something to begin to shake their longstanding beliefs?

Does anyone else feel like we're missing something?

>>25356

What if Oprah controls NK?

>>25548

I could get behind the purpose being just to make Q legit, but I'm still struggling with the inconsistency in how we're using [X]. Or maybe we just haven't found the correct markers yet? I'm going to have a hard time redpilling anyone if there isn't a clear pattern.

>>25713

I agree! But I don't think this is what we've been focused on. Some of the clocks we've made seem rather random, rather than employing this logic.