Anonymous ID: 85c4a8 Jan. 8, 2018, 8:21 a.m. No.25942   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25548

^^^^THIS

 

This anon is correct, this is all about creating a receptive normie willing to be red pilled. I cannot believe that we are still having this discussion after last night so I will attempt to make it really easy.

 

1.) Redpilling is difficult because the normies think all of this is a "conspiracy theory." They watch the MSM and actually believe it is true.

2.) It will play out like this: anons can tell friends and family an event is imminent, i.e. McCabe will be arrested. People will receive the info, but will think it is "conspiracy theory" and dismiss it. However, in a few hours or days when it is announced on MSM that McCabe was arrested, they will remember that anon told them first. They will think, "How did anon know this?" "Maybe what anon told me has some truth to it.", etc. The normie will then approach the anon for additional redpilling. With each revelation by anon being proven true, the redpilling takes hold and the normie then tells their other normie friends what they now have seen verified. The "conspiracy theory" now becomes normie reality.

 

At this time, very few can predict the future. When this ability is demonstrated (as it would appear to be, in this scenario), human nature is such that the individual observing the phenomena is in awe and will immediately be responsive to further information.

Anonymous ID: 85c4a8 Jan. 8, 2018, 8:41 a.m. No.26117   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25788

 

Great idea, but I think this narrative will only be effective with normies after a few verified disclosures. Normies simply cannot wrap their heads around this kind of thing, at least not initially.

 

A simpler approach initially is for anon to reveal an event which is imminent according to the clock and a few other "crumbs". Once the event is "proved" in the eyes of the normie, they will be more receptive to additional redpilling. I'm a psychic. I redpill people all the time. If I can tell a complete stranger accurate names and dates of things current and past, they are usually VERY receptive to receiving information about the future. Anons will have to demonstrate proof to be taken really seriously. I believe that is why Q has engaged with us in this way.