dChan
Anonymous ID: 8dc841 Jan. 8, 2018, 8:53 a.m. No.26201   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6208 >>6214 >>6237

>>26057

>OPSEC Rules

>Before posting links, REMOVE the 'http/https://www' part.

SEE

>>26036

>you can also use the apostrophe

>two or three apostrophes before and after the https works fine to break the link and is more stylish

>two apostrophes for italics

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJe-XGoxEQ4

>three for bold

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfD2_tXiXeo

>both are easy to copy paste and both are broken links

This also preserves 'https' which is more secure generally.

 

IN SHORT REVISE TEXT THUSLY:

Before posting links, type or ' in front of https://www

When you want to access the site simply copy & paste it at the URL bar and the browser will resolve.

 

Etc. Not mad or yelling at you Baker, you're doing fine, we appreciate you guys, but please remember this important alteration for next bread.

 

Also as another anon may have mentioned last bread, OP seems to be missing a number of Q's most recent posts - from last night.

 

Thank you.

Anonymous ID: 8dc841 Jan. 8, 2018, 9:07 a.m. No.26307   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6441 >>6448

>>26271

>snow

>ice crystals

>crystal clear

 

I'm willing to bet he did, if you think so. Snowden's so damn mysterious. I still can't determine whose side he's on, given Q's calling into question, that. This is your opportunity to dig. Hurry before someone (me) takes it from you.

Anonymous ID: 8dc841 Jan. 8, 2018, 9:28 a.m. No.26458   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6473 >>6489 >>6498

>>26383

While what you're saying may be true - I don't know, I'm guessing it is, although I haven't looked into it personally - everything has meaning, no coincidences. One of Q's recent DEFCON posts pertained to understanding confirmations. Defining something is understanding it, no?

>DEF[ine]CON[firmation] [1]

No?

Anonymous ID: 8dc841 Jan. 8, 2018, 10 a.m. No.26685   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>26666

I'm not convinced the shills are the ones promoting Oprah investigation. More the contrary. And your satanic quads aren't swaying me any either.

Anonymous ID: 8dc841 Jan. 8, 2018, 10:19 a.m. No.26803   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>26789

This article could be of great use. I know Fox is one of the better MSM (based on Trump tweets) outlets, but even so I wouldn't expect them to fully catalog everything pertinent to us here. Nevertheless, however, if this article was intended for us - and I believe it may have been, given the timing of its release and our newfound understanding of purpose related to article's subject - it may contain key keywords or otherwise point to the more important confs.