Yes, that is what I have noted for our comms is that ( ) denotes "them" and [ ] denotes a confirmation marker, but not necessarily "us". More of a definition. Sometimes the ( ) are to hide a word though, so use discretion.
dig the [$115,000,000] exact figure crumb from a Q post and you'll find their largest client in 2006, which was a Utility company, bond deals for that exact amount, and their board that includes VJ (important). Track that money and the board – look for corn syrup, which is in everything. Look for inner city (black pop) fundraisers that never reached those neighborhoods, etc. Hussein likely owes that money back to that group. It's part of what funded his Senate run.
Also, it ties back to MichelleOblamma's brother
It's "a" method, but I'm not convinced it's "the" method. It's pretty far-reaching in certain areas that lead to conclusions that contradict other confirmations from Q. Lot of work, so I respect it, but it may need a tweak as we learn more.
Think about it this way. WikiLeaks was pointing this board (Q) to those specific 2 chapters. Otherwise, why bother with the effort it took to make those changes? What's in those 2 chapters?