>He certainly gave the real deal on Vegas
bullshit. he threw out some guesses, some turned out to be right, most are completely unsubstantiated. he might be an operator of some sort, but he's nowhere near the inner Q.
>He certainly gave the real deal on Vegas
bullshit. he threw out some guesses, some turned out to be right, most are completely unsubstantiated. he might be an operator of some sort, but he's nowhere near the inner Q.
So here's a problem / opportunity. How do we do a diff on the actual published version and the PDF released by WikiLeaks?
How do we determine if they're from the same Q (source), if you'll pardon the pun?
A good start would be comparing TOC and page count………..
Also, it was posted on Drive, and now has been removed. Did anyone archive a copy on another platform?