Anonymous ID: 53519e Jan. 8, 2018, 2:03 p.m. No.28594   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8599

>>28373

Rubbing it in their faces won't get them on board. It will just make them dig in more. I know my snowflake friends a little too well. Gotta show them evidence.

Anonymous ID: 53519e Jan. 8, 2018, 2:22 p.m. No.28724   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>28570

Hmm… Not sure what to think about those. Was in a totally non-political forum when someone shared that a drone attacked a wedding he was attending.

Anonymous ID: 53519e Jan. 8, 2018, 2:34 p.m. No.28801   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8817

>>28652

Rumor has it, Pine Gap tried to shoot down a UFO and had the ray reflected right back at them, causing at least some destruction of the base. Can anyone confirm that?

Anonymous ID: 53519e Jan. 8, 2018, 2:52 p.m. No.28970   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>28765

Goes back to Q questions about Dems and media, maybe? I have to agree. There's relevance. And she's as capable of financing her campaign as POTUS was.

Anonymous ID: 53519e Jan. 8, 2018, 3:09 p.m. No.29114   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>28860

Same sentiment here. I would rather be under the radar. I haven't asked for anything because I don't need to. I don't name myself in my work.

Anonymous ID: 53519e Jan. 8, 2018, 3:23 p.m. No.29229   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>28908

There's a lot of material. I've debated making the raw posts available, the stuff I work with. I could. But there is a LOT of irrelevant stuff, too. Tough call. Making ALL of available allows for better searching, but waters down the result and we're back at overwhelming again. I have visions of making much more available than I already have, though. If they want it ALL, they can always go to the chans.