Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. Confirmation bias is a variation of the more general tendency of apophenia.
People also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).
A series of psychological experiments in the 1960s suggested that people are biased toward confirming their existing beliefs. Later work re-interpreted these results as a tendency to test ideas in a one-sided way, focusing on one possibility and ignoring alternatives. In certain situations, this tendency can bias people's conclusions. Explanations for the observed biases include wishful thinking and the limited human capacity to process information. Another explanation is that people show confirmation bias because they are weighing up the costs of being wrong, rather than investigating in a neutral, scientific way. However, even scientists can be prone to confirmation bias
However, none of this applies to what we do here. That's all for other assholes.
Confirmation biases contribute to overconfidence in personal beliefs and can maintain or strengthen beliefs in the face of contrary evidence. Poor decisions due to these biases have been found in political and organizational contexts.[3][4]
But no…
K = Kike
E= Enemies
Y= Yoyos
S= Stein
T= Tyler the AI program
O= Oprah
N= Nuts
E= Eats Babies
Solved.
(got old two months ago I think)
Sky fortress is an extraterrestrial craft…..
Things have gone south in general
So much faggotry and shillery and fuckery
Let's just Trump get's something done soon.
Obviously here is yet another Monday come and gone.
Heard so many times. Monday Monday Monday Shit's going down!
Only thing I see going down is a lot of Namefags pumping up their Twitter/Blogs/Books at this point.
Too much fuckery
Corsi is yet another example of this credibility of this operation since around Christmas.
Among others.
If Q said he was done with it.
Look back around Christmas Eve.
When they got on the board and the post started with
"Full Disclosure" and read from there.
So then it went dark till someone broke the tripcodes and then suddenly Q is posting full stories, basically handing/spoon feeding shit to you out of nowhere.
I have a new theory….this is a good feel cottage industry you got going….and you can't let it stop now.
So Q is now one of the BO's or Mods or whoever else needs Q to keep going for your books/blogs.
Cause man…otherwise this is turned into a lode of bullshit
Be ok if we just went on our own without Q
Cause this Q just don't sound like Q
Since when did Q jump on at any time of the day to do a Q and A with famefags?
Answer? After New Years