dChan
Anonymous ID: 10af6b Jan. 8, 2018, 5:53 p.m. No.30494   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I turned off Corsi when he started talking about wanting people to come here.

 

Why are we standing for this shit?

 

Is PA really doing a demonitized YT? If so I support because we need our own avenue to distribute the sausage and we need to rob these fuckers of their views. Let them suck up the leftovers and provide "commentary" and we can provide the real information, as ANONS.

 

going to FINRA.org now to dig into LOOP. Feeling a Q visit

Anonymous ID: 10af6b Jan. 8, 2018, 5:58 p.m. No.30536   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0567 >>0580

>>30261

PAMPHLET YOU NEED TO COME IN AND TAKE SUGGESTION AND DISCUSSION FROM US.

 

If you're truly going to do this don't be a cock. Do it right and get anon consensus on topics and also format.

Anonymous ID: 10af6b Jan. 8, 2018, 6:12 p.m. No.30672   🗄️.is 🔗kun

OK SINCE PA HAS DECIDED NOT TO TAKE GROUP CONSENSUS AS HE PREVIOUSLY SAID HE WOULD - HERE IS MY SUGGESTION.

 

  1. We outline basic rules of participation here. ie: LURK MOAR

 

  1. We outline their "role" make them feel invested - ie: TELL ALL YOUR NORMIE FRIENDS AND DONT POST IDIOTIC QUESTIONS TO THE BOARD

 

  1. We review pertinent information from the past day or so

 

  1. Question time.

 

THATS ALL.

Anonymous ID: 10af6b Jan. 8, 2018, 6:15 p.m. No.30701   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>30683

I'm actually not against this and it's rather comfy I'm just saying there should be rules and some form of participation and consensus from the rest of us.

 

One anon doesn't speak for all. And fucking Diabetus Corsi (respect tho for his past work) sure as fuck doesnt.