>>30675

>>30690

>>30816

>>30854

1. No he wasn't.

2. There is zero evidence to support your claim in any way whatsoever.

3. Even if I grant you your argument, you're still a hypocritical newfag for responding to someone you believed (wrongfully) was a shill.

4. By telling me to learn to identify, and presuming to give me advice, you're projecting - a telltale sign of liberal progressive cuckery

5. Your failure to recognize these flaws before delivering your response, by yourself, only further suggests your own newfaggotry

6. It's great to be Huwhite.

>>30980

Good work. I've stated repeatedly KEYWORDS are also forms of markers. It's not just timestamps.

>>31040

Wtf are you talking about

>>31097

10:21

10:36

10:23

10:24

Eh, I guess you're right, this does seem fucky. IIRC, the revised tweet began a half hour after original? In any case I don't believe it was (or could have) happened within the same time frame.

>>31140

If you made that, good effort, but the layout is way too confusing for normies or even me to follow.