>>30972

The absolute last thing the elites want is for him to be assassinated. They may want him dead. They may hate him….

But there is a problem with assassinating him. They know how hard they have had to rig the system. They know how hard it is to keep America under thumb. Britain is a tame cuck by comparison - and even they occasionally get the crazy idea of doing their own thing.

There are a lot of prior service who voted for Trump and to drain the swamp. An assassination would entrench major portions of the military and population against the swamp. This is not JFK where there was a belief in the Russian threat. Nor is the political climate anywhere near the same. Trump was elected because the Laputians are deeply disliked.

They want him impeached. They want his movement routed and suppressed - or the appearance of it. If we think the enemy is just too powerful and shut down to focus on our own self preservation - they win. That is what they want. They want us to lose faith in the ability to resolve anything through elections or law… For some of us to go crazy and become partisan militants to be mopped up by the state… But for most to just give up and accept that we are on the losing side of history.

Martyring Trump in an assassination would be absolutely horrible. For everyone - but would almost certainly….

Hmm…..

Well… If they are that stupid… Calm in the storm. Calm in the storm.

>>31231

Plasmas have been shown to be able to function as lenses for microwaves. The next generation of RF/Microwave antennas for radar and other purposes are expected to be plasma based lens systems that allow for focusing of energy in ways that were not previously possible with phased arrays and/or reflectors.

>>31322

Plasma containment is the comparably easy part in space. I have a number of theories, but I would start with RF based generators - "surfatrons" to generate the plasma and then begin playing around with how to shape the plasma. May even run it as part of a cyclotron system… Use a sextapole magnet to splay the beam at a point and then fire a phased array across it before trapping and recovering back into the accelerator. A linear setup could be used in an open or closed loop setup for pulse operation.

Have no idea what beam currents would need to be or what kind of interactions to expect. Cooling of the beam would be a challenge if in continuous mode. Static plasmas could potentially be used, but their power consumption is similar to particle accelerators of small scales, and don't necessarily include closed-loop recycling of the gas. See plasma windows.

It would really only be useful for targeting small platforms with frequencies they are vulnerable to. It would not necessarily be a nation-killing EMP weapon.

Of course, why not a laser cannon that is simpler to use?

I was simply throwing some of my own knowledge out there for discussion. Not really meaning to advance that particular theory. I would actually expect it to be a neutral particle cannon - which we have put into space and tested, before I believe it to be an EMP. That was 80s tech and we can make that stuff with COTS solid state, today.