>>4013

I love the misspelled "designs" on RQDesings … a true testament to the Millennial generation.

This was on the Fox News web site:

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2017/12/19/stunning-ufo-encounter-by-us-navy-pilot-it-was-not-from-this-world.html

It appears that they're not letting up on this narrative, indicating they may be moving full-on forward with the fake alien disclosure stuff.

>>4077

??? 404 is the web return code for "not found."

>>4104

It's pretty obvious that most of what Q posts, we're not going to decode without a team effort. Nobody knows everything, but everybody knows something, and every person in the effort is going to contribute the breakthrough for any given item at some point or another.

At the risk of being strung up by my thumbs, I'm reposting this because I think it's that important. And stuff is so easy to miss in here. No info was given on who posted this, and I didn't see any discussion on whether it was fake or not. If it is fake, I need to get rid of it and never revisit it again.

>>4116

This could be why Rahmette Emanuelle let things get so out of hand in Chicago: to have an excuse to plant UN troops here. I don't think Trump would ever allow it, but still, why is he not looking for the National Guard to help?

Just before midnight, 12/22, I was banned from CBTS for posting about the Intel Management Engine. It's the back door sub-level CPU that allows everything from powering up your system to reformatting the hard drive, remotely. Nobody knows how to stop it. Of far more concern than the ban itself (it's just a bunch of punk kids moderating the place) is the fact that Q chose to post there, knowing the most valuable posters are going to be banned eventually. I have contributed dozens upon dozens of valuable postings in there and I was banned for mentioning the IME (Intel Management Engine). What does that say about what's really going on? This is the first time I've had cause to question what's happening. If the question can be resolved satisfactorily, then there is no issue. But considering the kid-level fighting that goes on there without banning anybody, then I'm banned for posting info most people don't have (they think they cannot be identified but every single one already is, without exception) but certainly should be aware of, then people should know. All I have to do is create a program that connects at the sockets level and I can set my IP address to anything I want so getting back in is not a problem. It's not about that. Why was a beginning discussion about the IME being banned? That's the concern.