>>116
lol. The shills started their own board too.
>>116
lol. The shills started their own board too.
I think it's a psyop. The divide and conquer shills needed it to look like the trip was about to be cracked to justify imposing their name ban.
I think the real suspect thing is how the anti-'namefag' ploy has been pushed by certain loud voices since back on half and then the second it gets enforced we have this all happen.
And the latest Q posts look to point in valid directions to me.
Why does that set you off? Following the husbands is a worthwhile thing to do with the female players involved.
Q even provided an example. Did you know that Susan Rice was married to an ABC News producer? Because I sure didn't.
Yeah, XXX has been disruptive but has also been around forever and proven herself at times, I think. Basically led the fight against the Baker's Union.
Also, her taste in anime is cool.
I don't have a problem with them agreeing to be interviewed, wanting to get the word out and all.
I'm more suspect of the interviewee. Isn't it the same guy who got the fake Q email? And just the timingโฆ right in the middle of this, when it can damage credibility and prove the shills "namefags are out for attention" narrative right.
Soros owns the voting machines. If vote rigging is proven in AL, it won't look good for him.
Ties in with whole "special place" for Soros posts.