Anonymous ID: 3d8611 Jan. 6, 2018, 6:31 a.m. No.5999   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5991

A time to work out if the script is working or not, and iron out the problems, shake out the weaker or less reliable actors. Then come back stronger than ever. The show must go on.

Anonymous ID: 3d8611 Jan. 6, 2018, 6:33 a.m. No.6001   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5996

>not sure,if you have sauce post it. Im gonna shitpost till Q gets here

 

Just speculation, a critical eye on the game from an outsider looking in and trying to decipher the shape of it.

Anonymous ID: 3d8611 Jan. 6, 2018, 8:10 a.m. No.6168   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6139

thanks codemonkey.Your work on this is very appreciated. hope we didn't put you to too much trouble Might be an idea to repost on cbts. idiots there already saying just copy paste.

Anonymous ID: 3d8611 Jan. 6, 2018, 8:18 a.m. No.6191   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6210 >>6224

Thoughts about new board. How feasible is it? Would have to select BO and mods to delete spam, illegal content, as Q won't have time. How does Q know can trust them?

Only real way is for Q to create the board. Codemonkey confirm legit, And then use it to drop crumbs only. Read only. nobody but Q posting, and then link to other boards for discussion.

Anonymous ID: 3d8611 Jan. 6, 2018, 8:23 a.m. No.6210   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6196

Thanks again. Seems right. what do you think about new board? I just posted suggestion here - >>6191

seems best way to avoid too much work for all parties imho.

Anonymous ID: 3d8611 Jan. 6, 2018, 8:45 a.m. No.6305   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6224

The drama continues even with confirmation. Color me surprised. We all play our parts never the less, even is we suspect the drama has turned into a farce.

Anonymous ID: 3d8611 Jan. 6, 2018, 8:53 a.m. No.6348   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>6326

Understood. Was a bit of a vein hope on our part. Can you or Q make a board read only, so Q could be board owner? Seems best compromise.