Anonymous ID: bb8ee4 Jan. 6, 2018, 4:53 p.m. No.10027   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0060 >>0079 >>0085 >>0164

Working on a Loop Capital Management infograph - so just to clarify what is Michelle Obama's family relationship with someone at that company?

 

>>9893

WE NEED YOUR HELP! Currently the spreadsheet is on a free platform, chosen because it allowed real-time editing by the public. There isn't any way to change the permissions to add but NOT delete. Some psycho threatened to delete a lot so it's now read/download only. Can you help me figure out another solution?

Anonymous ID: bb8ee4 Jan. 6, 2018, 5:06 p.m. No.10119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0134

>>10085

I'm not sure how to fit that into the infograph - mainly concentrating on how it's money laundering (very, very basic) and the CEO friends with 'bama. But there was something posted about how MICHELLE OBAMA'S family member was connected with LOOP CAPITAL in some way. I didn't save all the info because I was working ont he spreadsheet to update it with Q's posts (direct links and archived ones).

 

I KNOW I saw it, I just don't remember it - I want to show how it's typical Chicago nepotism pay-for-play scam.

Anonymous ID: bb8ee4 Jan. 6, 2018, 5:11 p.m. No.10154   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0257

>>10060

>>10079

To be clear, I'm not in any asking to create a whole new platform, since that seems pretty damn sophisticated. Something like what our codefag on github has but perhaps with the ability for anons to enter answers/info that would need to be reviewed & approved before being deemed high confidence level. (github link also in the OP or top posts).

 

As for easier method of communication… eh I could create an email account just for that I guess?

Anonymous ID: bb8ee4 Jan. 6, 2018, 5:16 p.m. No.10202   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10152

>I sure as hell you stay off the youtube circuit interview scene.

YES PLEASE. We are anonymous (I choose not to use a tripcode). We are the workers in the back office, nameless, faceless, amorphous like mist. WE are not important as personalities or names or individuals, yet each anon is important AS AN ANON.

The entire interview phenomena is ruinous because it puts the focus on us rather than on our output.

The focus should ONLY be on the output, period.

 

We were given a task. It is up to us to complete that task satisfactorily. To POTUS' satisfaction. That's who we are working for.

 

>>10134

Michelle's brother Craig Malcom Robinson

THANK YOU, that's what I needed!

Anonymous ID: bb8ee4 Jan. 6, 2018, 5:22 p.m. No.10257   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10190

Can you sum this up for me in a short blurb I can use on an infograph please? I will include it somewhere.

 

>>10164

>>10154

 

>cursory search tells me you can lock rows and columns in a smartsheet to prevent them from being deleted. Not sure if that would still allow them to be added to.

Yes it does prevent public participation. The problem is that there is no way that I can realistically scrape all the good info from the threads and add them to the spreadsheet. I just honestly can't. And without others' participation it is basically just like the pastebins, raw text files etc - just a record of Q's posts. But that defeats the whole purpose of it (repository of what anons' find as answers).

 

>>10141

Thank you - I happened to see it upon scrolling (link didn't quite work out). I appreciate it.