Hiya frens…
This didn't get any traction on the QR board, anon consensus was fake & ghey.
But - since this board is slower I thought I'd bring it over, in case we want to put it on the mental back burner and try to figure it out.
Disclaimer - it might be a red herring or a slide or a trap so please decode responsibly :)
>Why if it was so important would the person writing the post be putting a riddle forward that they already have the answer too? Me thinks it is a distraction ploy
Good point - I think that's what it is too. Trying to get anons to go chasing off on dead ends or worse yet, get in legal trouble.
These efforts to tie recent shootings to the chans seem to support the theory too.
On Ratcliffe:
Here is what PDJT had to say about it
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1157352000327180289
My guess - he wasn't going to be able to stand up to the onslaught, especially if he fudged his resume. And whether he actually fudged it or not is unimportant at this point, because the fake news had already seeded the 'he's not credible' idea.
Everyone needs to see the director of national intelligence as CREDIBLE.
I feel like we are at a dicey time right now, with the far left terror attacks ramping up and the attempts to suck in the chans/Q/POTUS. Silence from Q on 8chan is probably best at this point. (my opinion only)