>>14798

but superheroes follow their own path, no one else.

personally I think the fear porn is a mechanism built directly into the law of one. the fear of consequences of life choices keeps one stuck in a fear state of mind

your path is different from all others, as with everyone

here is a question, why did the law of one fail to mention what happens if you are 50/50? why such a definable 49/51? Who is keeping track of the score?

my last question, how can you prove reincarnation is a thing? how can you really prove it? it's a BELIEF. you BELIEVE it to be real, but you cannot prove it.

Like god. People believe in god, but they can't prove it's existence most religions all believe in a different god, and there is no room to change that belief in their mind. in their mind it is 100% real and exactly what they think it is

does believing something make it 100% true without solid evidence and facts?

this is not to provoke any kind of negative reaction, I just feel it is my small duty to ask this

>>14847

First point, we're all anonymous here aren't we? If you are looking for a specific anon then that means you are looking for a specific persona or archetype, ego, whatever you want to call it. So if you are looking for a specific person you condone individualism. You condone individualism by seeking clarification from a specific anon. Or else why would you be trying to find out who it is?

Second point, I've noticed some odd vibes coming from your posting history here. My perception at first glance is you are looking for reactions. Going by your posts here, and comparing it to posts from Q Research, I can draw some parallels but I'll leave that alone for now.

Third, are you ID e1b66a from that Q Research thread? The reason I'm asking is because you are essentially seeking to further the discussion that anon seems to be having with someone who allegedly posts here. Upon further review and by comparing numerous coincidences between the posting history from that individual, both in that thread, and the entire series of threads, it appears that that ID e1b66a is one and the same as the individual pushing copious amounts of CE-5 / Greer related material with multiple IP's over the entire course of posting since those threads began. The same individual Doc appeared to be battling from early on. That ID also stated in post # 10143455 "Examples of kayfabe in this thread: Anything involving people, personas, and the "rivalries" between them. Example: "Government Healer", "L", "grierfag", "truthlegion/TL"… anything to remove genuine conversation and information exchange."

That anon is comparing L to the likes of Truthlegion. That anon also stated that essentially anything discussed related to TL is a distraction from genuine conversation. The above is so everyone is aware of that ID's posting history in that thread, along with the fact that you are appearing to be replying for that anon with a vested interest in that conversation. Why else would you specifically prod regarding those specific posts unless you were invested in them?

That anon also fits the exact profile of the same individual that came here from those breads previously, which was dubbed "Safe Space" here. That individual appeared to be attempting to cause division and drama, by inciting circle talk even after Doc welcomed them. Which leads to my first point, if you are "Safe Space" then you previously stated you do not approve of individualism, so that would be a contradiction in regards to trying to find the anon you were allegedly talking to that allegedly posts here. Would it not?

So, you are replying for e1b66a or at least seeking to further a discussion with continuity regarding that anon and the exchange with someone who supposedly knows of this place or posts here. There is a vested interested in that conversation which appears to be drama based at it's core. That anon was mocking TL and comparing it to L the LARP in terms of credibility.

Comparisons, The individual who battled with Doc for ages in those threads appears to be one and the same as e1b66a, the individual who came here and caused problems previously, appeared to be the exact same individual, now you are poking at a conversation from Q Research that once again brings drama here, and also fits the exact hallmarks of the same person sparring with Doc previously in the Diversions thread. Which also fits the hallmarks of the same anon that was posting hundreds of times in the early days in order to control the topics of conversation at Q Research.

Just trying to keep track. What are you trying to gain from this discussion in regards to the vested interests from ID e1b66a at Q Research? What are you hoping to achieve from the furtherance of discussion?

How do we know that anon talking about TL wasn't one of "them" and simply stirring the pot?

Can you prove you did not make those posts to reply to yourself to cause some kind of issue here?

>>14848

Just spitballin' and chewing on thoughts, have a lovely day lovely!!

See, I also recognize her persona.

:-)

>>14892

Got to admit I appreciate the dialogue over the past day on here. Most days these breads are slow, there's a reason for it. Most of the info discussed here is way over most people's heads and I get that.

This resonated with me.

Sometimes even an attempt to cause disruption can be met with some good philosophy to come out of it.

At the end of the day the TL ethos still stands, no one person is above another. All beliefs should be considered equal, even that of L, Grierfag, Safe Space and those who have sought division here since day one.

>>14965

>Still trying to defend blatant lies. Completely side stepping the rest of the posts PRETENDING TO BE Q. Side stepping the posts insinuating he is ABOVE Q and has more knowledge than Q.

The tweets are rather revealing, aren't they? I love watching them squirm trying to explain and cover it up.

>>14961

>BOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!! 100% PROOF ITS HIM AS I KNEW ALL ALONG!!!!!

Safe space never left dude. I too recognized his style immediately when he posted asking "who is shitposting at QR". If anything he's over here inciting arguments as he's done at QR for years. That's his job, deal with it. The shills realize anons here aren't stupid enough to believe Kaboomer or the other incarnated authority LARPs. They just want us arguing and distracted from the real digs. Shills desperately want anons following Kaboomer and other disinformation in hopes of believing their "soul mission" trash. As points both here and QR are valid, the incarnated alien LARP is nothing more than a new-age take on authority figures. If someone is an incarnated alien, they will be viewed as superior by normies, and thus far more likely to be believed.

Gotta love seeing them in their death throes.

>>14967

>He never pretended to be Q.

Oh really? How do you explain him signing off tons of posts with Q at the bottom and saying he was with Q and part of the team? I know you can read, but you are clearly pretending not to notice. Just as you have done previously at QR when faced with this exact predicament.

>>14957

>>14952

Read. I know you can do it.

"Q is part of this. WE decided as a group to allow a more Spiritual Teaching to be done on Kabamur's SM accounts and let other "Q" messages be more of what many call news worthy."

No outside comms faggot.

>(his mother) contacted people that knew more about who they are.

What kind of security clearance does Kabamurs mother have? Who is she? Where did she work? Was she an Adm. or Gen.? Why does she have more information than Q? Why does she have more clearance to know more than Q? Please provide facts and digs proving her legitimacy. Or does all of her information strictly come from the voices in her head too?

As others mentioned already on QR that you saying something is a well known fact does not make it a fact. That is suggestion, and your intent has evil behind it. Should everyone just ignore his numerous portrayals of pretending to be Q and just believe everything else he says because he's an incarnated nordicfag sent here on a mission to guide everyone?

>>14970

The shill (ade82c) has been at this a long time fren. A long long LONG fucking time. I've been tracking him too along all of this, and I've engaged back and forth at QR after watching Strange calling him out originally. His agenda and narrative never changed, nor has he ever once been willing to deviate from his concrete beliefs. It's his narrative or the highway, and he'll use as many IP's as necessary to consensus crack.

I'm surprised Strange hasn't chimed in about any of this yet. Waiting for anons to mention something key? Isn't this your old enemy?

>>14972

>Only (You) know your Way up the mountain.

Thank you Antman. I however make myself aware of everyone's agendas. Understanding agendas and why others want us to believe them is critically important to understanding the entire matrix around us. I also take great pride in discerning which anons are which. Some are easy to follow! By the way, I don't think psychedelics are the answer for these questions, they only give a different perspective and path to finding the same answers that must come from internally.

Well color me surprised, the same shillfaggot here trying to narrative drive and consensus crack just admitted to being the baker at Q Research. Wow, there's a shocker. 49 posts of consensus cracking and controlling the narrative there, attacking anyone and projecting they are a shill if they disagree with his narratives.

ade82c here is one and the same as e1b66a at Q Research. Now the evidence is mounting up against him. He's proving to everyone here he's trying to dominate the thought process of anons.

>>>/qresearch/10273265

Didn't Strange categorize a bunch of evidence of shills controlling those bakes previously?

>>14984

Anons are winning the digital battle both here and at Q Research. Nothing better than when a team comes together with their strengths to solve problems.