LOL! not when it comes to this! lay(wo)mans terms por favor?
I notice the poetry…like an autist….
red (pill) shift, blue (pill) shift
>until they added the spark.
how?
in generall, this has to do with our quantum power as the observer?
also plasma= fire +water
HHO
(as far as I know)
>LOL! not when it comes to this!
to clarify (purify) lol
you all are genius too! I love working with you.
I am sure…but this math equations got me like que amigo? so only on some subjects…. thats why we a TEAM!
also I have heard from a few sources and sauces, that red shift is not quite right… ill dig…
but until then:
In a recent paper (Kovetz, 1969) it has been shown that among all homogeneous
isentropic configurations of given mass M there exists one with minimal entropy
s~,in(M). Furthermore, the corresponding radius R(M, smln) is the lowest possible,
and hence the red shift
Zmax(M ) = [1 - 2GM/c2R(M, Smin)] -1 – 1 (1)
is the highest possible for this mass.
what does that mean in ingles?
pulsation
outbreath. expansion.
inbreath. entropy
real good sauce:
http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/forum/f19n04p275_the-stars-in-their-courses.htm
digesting….
>How the carbon, hydrogen and all the other elements in the sun originally were formed is a problem unanswered by modern science, but we may be sure that no attempted explanation can be more than superficial which ignores the Cosmic consciousness and intelligent control over the ceaseless and universal activities of the One Life that is behind all phenomena.
its ELectirc
(boogie woogie woogie) :)
Yah i don't fully get it. FUnny enough I JUST was wondering about this (red shift)today (coinkidink) of course! cuz I had a friend once very confident explain it to me but from a real life science view that I knew want the whole story……
I remember watching a wilcock video (wisdom teachings on Gaia) where he talks about redshift and how the theory is not quite right…
here is a guy who Wilcock studied and based this sauce on:
Dr Halton Arp.
http://electric-cosmos.org/arp.htm
Arp states "The deepest 200 inch (Mt. Palomar) plates that I have been able to obtain clearly show a 'tail' coming out of the southeast end of NGC 7320." He points out, "A tail like this from NGC 7320… must be an interaction tail - which could arise only from physical interaction with the adjacent high-redshift members of the Quintet."
****a tail? comet anon am I over a target!? help a lady out! this will take more digesting…whatdaya think antman?
and more: this "feels" more right to me
Quantum! Electric! this scientist is denied publication, usually an indicator, eh! ****
In addition, these inherent redshift z values of quasars seem to be quantized! Unusually tight groupings of those calculated values occur centered around values of
z = 0.061, 0.3, 0.6, 0.96, 1.41, 1.96, etc… such that (1+z2) = 1.23(1+z1). [For example, 1.23(1+0.3) = 1.60].
The very existence of this quantization alone, is sufficient proof of the failure of the idea that redshift is only an indicator of recessional speed (and therefore distance). This quantization means (under the redshift equals distance interpretation) that quasars all must lie in a series of concentric shells with Earth at the center of the entire arrangement. Copernicus found out a long time ago that Earth isn't at the center of anything!
Recently mainstream astronomers have joyfully announced that they can find no quantization effects in the observed redshift values of quasars. Of course not! The raw measured total redshift values of the universal set of all known quasars are not quantized. It is the inherent redshift z values that are!
Instead of nominating him for a prize (and simultaneously reexamining their assumption that "redshift equals distance"), Arp was (and continues to be) systematically denied publication of his results and refused telescope time. One would at least expect the "powers that be" to immediately turn the Chandra X-ray orbiting telescope, the Hubble space telescope, and all the big land based telescopes toward Arp's exciting discoveries in order to either confirm or disprove them once and for all. Instead, these objects have been completely excluded from examination. Official photographs are routinely cropped to exclude them. Those familiar with the Galileo story will remember the priests who refused to look through his telescope.
Evidence Says Arp is Right - A Quasar In Front of a Nearby Galaxy
The final irrefutable falsification of the "Redshift equals distance" assumption is the following image of galaxy NGC 7319 (Redshift = 0.0225). The small object indicated by the arrow is a quasar (Redshift z = 2.11) This observation of a quasar between the galaxy and Earth is impossible if the quasar is over ninety times farther away than the galaxy.
good idea.
as above so below, as within, so without.
cells as stars?
the electric network of our synapsis?
quantum PHI DNA?
pic related to this statement: (methinks its possible)
>The isophotes in the central section of 4319 suggest that the galaxy is indeed a barred spiral.
big bang debunked:
Arp discovered, by taking photographs through the big telescopes, that many pairs of quasars (quasi-stellar objects) which have extremely high redshift z values (and are therefore thought to be receding from us very rapidly - and thus must be located at a great distance from us) are physically associated with galaxies that have low redshift and are known to be relatively close by. Arp has photographs of many pairs of high redshift quasars that are symmetrically located on either side of what he suggests are their parent, low redshift galaxies. These pairings occur much more often than the probabilities of random placement would allow. Mainstream astrophysicists try to explain away Arp's observations of connected galaxies and quasars as being "illusions" or "coincidences of apparent location". But, the large number of physically associated quasars and low red shift galaxies that he has photographed and cataloged defies that evasion. It simply happens too often
Because of Arp's photos, the assumption that high red shift objects have to be very far away - on which the "Big Bang" theory and all of "accepted cosmology" is based - is proven to be wrong! The Big Bang theory is therefore falsified.
so if high redshift quasars and low redshift quasars are not separated by vast distances what, ultimately does that mean?
the electric network connection between light bodies of all of the cosmos?
is this the network we can quantum leap (I loved that show heh!) with in?
why is it so hard to find sauce/research this subject?
why is there a stupid sitcom with supposed smart nerds as the main characters that always comes up instead of actual scientific thought?
methinks they be hiding something…something Big
but it don't go bang.
Maybe it was an AUOOOOMMMMM. and not an explosion. (these evil guys love explosion, dont they!)
kek!
>as above so below,
As above, so below.
tee hee.. great minds….
>As we move to the center of the toroid, the does the velocity increase? Would us reaching the 0 point start to show everything moving away relative to us?
and what is velocity relative to that POV of the earth? of our selves? does it change (observer POV) relative to where we are in the geometry of this torus?
I am imagining the our planet being squeezed into this shape, the zero point being the middle, the event horizon, the zero point….then spit out the other side….? dunno how true that is…I may be reaching… mental gymnastics indeed!
>As we move to the center of the toroid, the does the velocity increase? Would us reaching the 0 point start to show everything moving away relative to us?
and what is velocity relative to that POV of the earth? of our selves? does it change (observer POV) relative to where we are in the geometry of this torus?
LOL!! I think i just asked the exact same question as you but just diff phrasing! ok break time! I love your genius minds fellas!!
Yes MORDo But WHAT IF??
What if plasma could be used for positive regeneration????? Rife was NOT the only one who has found the keys to curing disease…
there are many many more (just look at how many killed)
check these digs out:
>>5436 Troy Hertabese and ANgel Light
>>5437 HHO plasma torch
What if???? we could turn the evil 5G network into a free energy grid for good?? Maybe that is the ultimate plan? heres hoping!!! (hope is eternal, and springs from the human heart for a reason, when all else seems lost, our POWER is HOPE and intention.) Maybe we can power the grid with LOVE? Light? our ley lines? instead of the cell scrambling bull shit the energy was like sound and healed us in perfect vibratory geometry.
what if?
also kind of related to this thot—
Maybe it was an AUOOOOMMMMM. and not an explosion. (these evil guys love explosion, dont they!)
kek!
I had a thot last night that the big bang was more like a simultaneous cosmic harp strum with the 7 sacred harmonics – string theory?