Anonymous ID: 38f49f Dec. 26, 2019, 4:44 p.m. No.13527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3532

>>13526

Are you going to respond with more than some one liner "gotcha" or whatever the fuck you want to call it? Are you saying that the universe is dead matter except large organisms? What about all those pathogens that you just happen to get on you and utterly obliterate with your immune system? You're murdering billions and trillions when you use clorox wipes on the counter. Real adults think things through.

You never really addressed the issue I raised, so I'll raise it even higher. If I can coerce and manipulate people to do anything, should I? Am I immoral for convincing people to kill themselves and like it, or any other number of things? Who says people want to live after all, especially when they're suffering; if someone is suffering and I offer them a way out, and make it seem appealing (suicide) am I a good person? Or am I exploiting the situation, the person, their weakness (emotionally and rationally) and using exploited reasoning (bum fucked moral logic without a second thought and a third grade education)? The fact is it would take less effort for an evil fuck to convince someone to kill themselves than to actually help them. Most likely, your incompetence in making a "real difference" and the general incompetence of others in making a "real difference" has led to your current 'free will' belief, couched in its fatalistic despair and personal suffering.

How about you read some actual philosophy for fuck's sake.

Anonymous ID: 38f49f Dec. 26, 2019, 4:53 p.m. No.13529   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3532

>>13526

Maybe this approach is better:

If everyone's children, including your own (imagine you have them if you don't) were to all decide to walk into the nearest body of water and drown themselves, or a bunch of teenagers (imagine you have one) decide to murder one another for the thrill of it, should it be considered acceptable? Should it be tolerated? Should we offer our own "consent" to their suicide?