Your post seems prefabricated as if it was anticipating this.
Anticipating this because you knew Antman was going to be called out for "currently" endorsing L at Q research.
This isn't just about past words and actions, which of course are many.
Anons can go and read previous breads to confirm L is not only a spam bot but also imitates, since you pretend not to know based upon your self admitted lack of investigating and researching.
It's best to have all of the information prior to making opinions and statements, so if you fail to go back and read all the threads with L spamming nonsense than you are uninformed and unprepared to base an opinion on current happenings here.
Of course you can make an opinion, it's just uninformed because you don't have context.
You have also admittedly only been here a few times and haven't read every thread here.
Antman currently walks with L and endorses L.
L is a clown.
Antman is a clown by association.
This isn't the first time this happened here.
Antman has repeatedly done this over the years and repeatedly tried to stir up controversy.
When this happens, and it happens a lot, there always seems to be someone else there with paper thin substantiated rhetoric to further that controversy after he gets called out.
Someone there to cast shame for calling out poor ant.
That's where the real shilling occurs trying to get a reaction of lashing out from frustration, which luckily no one does but rather retorts with concise facts and not semi-transparent ill-informed interpretations.
Nothing has changed here concernfag. Anons call out shills it's what we do.
If you want a flowery harmonious circle jerk where anons do not voice their well substantiated concerns you can find that elsewhere.
This isn't meant to be an echo chamber.
We call each other out to keep in check.
No one person is above another, but if one person is acting like a clown and endorsing clowns to further their clown narratives they will be called on it accordingly.
Lesson concluded circle talk boy.