antman larping on QR
did a post similar to this >>13519
as well just didn't snatch the grab….
I am WW and I made these claims.
It seemed weird to me that the anon that was arguing with me in the fem/masc and antman were posting at the same time. I possibly wrongly assumed that that was phi anon based on style. It is confrontational and of a lower vibration (my take) I suppose the confrontational and philosophical style is similar, but may be just a new anon that found us here and was triggered by whatever I wrote (sometimes I feel like we are this little corner that no one knows about but this thread alone has 112 UIDs so… that has to be a wrong assumption on my end)
Antman I appreciate your crazy (albiet sometimes I am skeptical of its intention) and have said that I have loved you since the beginning of this journey, and that is the truth. There is absolutely no hate coming from me. We are each the role playing in our own live action.
At the top of the mountain shills and anons are only reflections of the myriad of selves.
en lak esh
20:20 silver that one is you?
my apologies for the confusion.
can you tell me how you deduced this number to 5:5? I had the EXACT same thought (5:5; 20:20) only a couple days ago, but then was like…. how does that work even… 20:20 is 4(5):4(5) ?
anyway…mind melds…can be confusing!
WE are one, as individuals… what a story!
Happy New Year to all
May our vision be loud and clear.