>>14785

not speaking for doc but my interpretation is the law of one is a tricky new age psyop designed to fool people into thinking you need to serve others before serving yourself in order to incarnate to higher level densities. basically like your ticket to heaven, or heavens heaven. its not just about being a good person, it's specifcally about serving other people in order to get your ticket to ride.

so basically my interpretation "do unto others as you would do for yourself" why focus your life around service to others when you can equalize that service for your own personal needs

it definitely starts to make me think a bit differently about all of this the harvest in the law of one always made me feel uneasy. definitely some form of consent attempting to be gained for harvesting

also the fear of death is producing massive amounts of loosh. probably why nearly every world religion is designed to make you worry about death and the afterlife, the most intense loosh vibes you can create

if there really are reptilians controlling this planet, their game goes back thousands and thousands of years which means absolutely everything in main stream society has some element of obfuscation or control, and religion is the biggest controller of the population, even more than government. government does not create loosh anywhere close to religion and worry about the aftermath of death

>>13931

>Oh ya and in the DUMBS hidden technology and ufo thread there are shills signing off posts with "L" LARPing as the light.

You notice now they are making the push there to try to convince anons that the L clown is Doc? I guess this was called months ago. When you understand their game all their moves become predictable.

>>15106

>>15113

>>15117

>>15122

so this is the post in question

>>>/qresearch/10448672

"You know your role. Much love to you "L"

The laugh is your toll… Bring your being to what you know with no filter.

Bring all that you know to the deepest depths of your being and then bring it to this table…

I will walk with you."

Since no one has asked you this question yet (not sure why not) why are you taking this stance? why are you specifically responding to this with sincerity when it's a blatantly obvious clown? they're spamming the threads with hundreds of posts yet you take them seriously like they actually have something to offer aside from confusion? what is your specific reasoning behind this? could you give a well thought out answer as to why you are supporting shills at q research? what is the benefit of that? you clearly used language and a picture that makes you easily identifiable over there, and it seems you deliberately did that.

>>15118

I don't care much for infighting, I just like facts. I hope they apologize to you prime. neither party should lash out when differences of opinion are inevitable, and that happens a lot here. This place at times can be comfy but also controversial when egos or personality types clash. what's important is to remain objective and state only facts without letting the ego or emotions get involved, which is goddamn hard I'll admit

>>15132

What is this supposed to mean? A statement or a trigger for something? antman is a vegetarian or at least that's what he was pushing on others much earlier on. I cannot help but draw parallels to questionable individuals pushing strong vegan narratives at QR. at one point ant was promoting the same ideologies as the "carnist" shamers at QR that seems to always repeat on those threads

>>15138

>Peace be with you as it is within me

yes I recognize that, do you feel ant is trying to cover his actions with love?

so as mentioned above facts are important, that's what truly matters not ego. so ant, can you give some clear facts why you are supporting shills at QR? thank you

>>15149

Excuse me? I think you have me confused with the poster above.

You can see who I am on here plain as day if you go back and read, I have no narrative whatsoever. My only narrative is truth finding and trying to understand why you continually appear to sow division and support shills both here and at QR then deflect any reasonable questions being asked about it.

I have asked a few questions on here but minimal compared to others, but at this point there appears like multiple people asking the same questions. Are you surprised by that?

You know what I am thinking now after seeing this play out? I think this plan was all concocted from the start. you make a post at Q Research with a very easily identifiable picture and posting style, supporting L, knowing full well that autists here can track patterns. Not only that but some here save everything from those threads.

Knowing this you expected those quote Oldfags would call you out on this, but you all expected it to be only one of those Oldfags who would do it. Hence why you and your little posse are trying so desperately to attach a name to posts.

But it backfired, it didn't work, you got called out by everyone instead. So in doing so you have continued to pin this all on one quote Oldfag in order to create more division with the core group of members who started posting here.

"Antmans a shill" - "No hes not you division shill!" - and so on the cycle repeats until everyone is so confused they don't know what to think anymore.

So you with your textbook classical style of posting fake words of love after displaying highly questionable activity at Q Research it was actually expecting to get called out, but you were expecting only one anon to call you out. But they didn't, and now your plan is failing.

This was a game from the start. You knew you'd be called on your actions at QR. You knew you'd be called on it. You assumed it would be only one "Oldfag" calling you out, but it wasn't. It's several of us now calling you out. Because of this you couldn't run your division game against a single namefag oldfag.

The attempts from these other mysterious posters to distract from antman getting called out have weak arguments at best, I personally feel like I deserve a rationale behind why antman is fluffing shills over at Q Research? Even better yet why are mysterious posters running to his defence that he doesn't need to explain his actions or his reasoning behind doing this?

How in any way shape or form does this response >>15140

answer any of the questions being asked?

This isn't anyone's particular narrative. You are supporting shills at Q Research and that is a fact. Why are you doing so?

What is your game here? What do you hope to accomplish? What do you bring to the table and what have you contributed here since this board started?

You could start by elaborating and clarifying with those questions, but I suspect you'll just loop back to that post and tell me it's just my narrative and not actually answer anything and sign off with "much love oldfag"

Can you prove me wrong for once about you?

>>15154

>You have expressed how my supporting a known shill creates division within this board and the other board with how it may be misinterpreted and that I am pushing a subverting narrative to deceive All and discount TL and the other board and I will admit on a surface level that is exactly what it looks like.

Yes it certainly does look like that. You do you, just not sure if there was anything to be learned from all of this. I expected some kind of a lesson or some other reasoning aside from the fact that [L] intrigues you.

When it comes to online personalities or namefagging the purpose is to track that individual and it removes anonymity. So I've seen many questionable things from your account and it absolutely needed to be ask, at least for my own closure.

Your initial deflection seemed very suspicious to me, and while I have no authority to force an answer out of you I think it would have greatly helped to state all of this without so much prompting to do so. The evasive side-stepping along with repetitive catch phrases definitely gives me the impression of gaslighting trying to get someone to react to you.

Everyone is free to post here as long as they aren't breaking the law.

Controversy will always be present on the internet, that will never change.

>>15189

>>15190

"A blue falcon is something you don’t want a reputation as if you want to enjoy your military service. It is a bravo foxtrot, a buddy fucker. The blue falcon will screw over his squad, platoon, company, or roomate at the slightest prompting. He’s the reason you’re doing Chinese field day on a Saturday. He’s the reason you have that safety stand down."

https://www.quora.com/Who-or-what-is-a-blue-falcon-in-military-parlance

>>15200

>I came here from QR, at the ufo bread I was being called a shill and a grierfag, just for telling my story.

Share some screenshots proving who you are in those interactions.

Others here share SS's from those threads for the specific reason of hashing out truth from lies.

I want to see some evidence of who you were in those.