Anonymous ID: f28bda Sept. 2, 2020, 12:13 p.m. No.15143   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5145

>>15141

 

No authority here, but Antman is being asked some very legit questions. Such as why is he supporting known shills? Is that not a valid question in contrast to his history of doing this? Also why are you speaking on his behalf? It seems like you are adding to the disruption by justifying that he doesn't need to answer these very valid questions. Also interesting to see certain messages like this arise every time he and his very sketchy posting history is questioned. I think we all deserve an answer as to why he is doing this yet again.

Anonymous ID: f28bda Sept. 2, 2020, 12:16 p.m. No.15144   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5145

A simple question is a simple question, it has nothing to do with authority but it has everything to do with logic and the transparency of truth. So once again Antman why don't you answer the valid questions being asked? Why are you harboring and enabling shills who mock and imitate members who post here?

Anonymous ID: f28bda Sept. 2, 2020, 3:58 p.m. No.15146   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I finally discovered Antman's true purpose here. Division is only a small part of it. The primary objective is to try to blend in as an OG TLfag and look like hes an accepted part of the "group". The reason for this is hes trying to make everyone look like clowns or crazy who post here. Also gaslighting with the "much love" crap. It's not real. It's not genuine. Its trying to provoke a reaction. He knows hes getting called out and deliberately avoiding answering the questions to piss ppl off, by countering with "much love" hes trying to get us to blow up at him for being so frustrating. Gaslighting baby.

 

Lesson concluded.

Anonymous ID: f28bda Sept. 3, 2020, 1:51 a.m. No.15148   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5149

>>15147

 

Do you realize some have posted here from very early on without a superhero identity or is that notion lost on you? You are attempting to attach a name to an identity which cannot be done. And how can you possibly compare "personality types" in this situation? The point blank fact is that Ant has on multiple occasions reinforced shills who are deliberately trying to derail here. If that fact is lost on you the rest will not make any sense to you. If you think that calling him out is "tactless" this notion will also be lost on you. If you are looking for new places on the kun to explore you should start looking, because your post smells of perpetuating the division and confusion that Ant has started. Which I might add has happened quite a few times over the years. At the end of the day what matters is overall contributions and how much someone helps others, which he does very little of. Random stews of meaningless tossed salads of fortune cookies does not add anything to this place. If you're trying to threaten to leave but your superhero alter ego is so important posting here and your individualized opinions are more important than anyone else then you should also start looking for somewhere else to post. You're playing the "oh woe is me" card for someone calling out poor Ant because hes deliberately trying to piss off regulars by bolstering shills at Q research who are mocking the very place you're posting at. L exists not only to spam those threads to derail any real discussions but also to take the original mysterious message from those threads referring to doc as the light and to pretend it was meant for L. That was very clear in earlier threads. I've also seen a ridiculous amount of info discussed here posted by L in those threads but done so to make the info look stupid. Now Ant is supporting the clown and failing to explain why, so if you think that's tactless for questioning the rest will be lost on you. If you cannot see any of these fact the rest will be lost on you, which much of this clearly seems to be. I also know that the shills who started here have never left, they just got really quiet for a while because every attempt to divide has failed. Didnt you notice Silver Surfer calling out Ant in the last general discussion for the very reason of deliberately poking for a reaction, then just saying he was shitposting, then sidestepping any questions regarding it? Is this the only OG TL member with a character identity that has called him out for his numerous questionable actions? No it's not. Just about everyone here has at one point or another. He has an extensive history of perpetuating actions which cause confusion and attempts to frustrate then walking away from explaining it. You're trying to connect an identity to this instance of once again calling out Ant, but f you could, why? Will you shift your focus to a personalized attack if you figure out that someone with a superhero character alter ego is calling him out? It shouldn't make a damn bit of difference who it is, what matters is the facts being stated. The facts remain, but perhaps your perception of fact is tactless.

 

So maybe you had this planned all along? Did you guys plan that Ant would eventually do this then stir up shit because hes being questioned on it then concernfag everything to death? Did you plan to cry about this place not being what it used to be? If that's the case you're dead wrong, because many here have questioned him before for his glaringly disingenuous actions, and every time he just doubles down with "much love" and fails to answer the questions being asked.

 

So once again if you are holding your oh so important superhero archetype over our heads and threatening to leave because Ant is being questioned then I suggest you actually do leave and stop posting because you're contributing nothing but added confusion to an already highly questionable situation and set of circumstances.

 

Are you trying to suggest that the majority of posts here are bots because that's hilarious. The only bots are Ant and the guy with like two hundred posts in the last general discussion thread. If you're trying to attach a bot label to anyone who questions poor poor Ant that's also outrageously hilarious.

 

Once again with tact I ask Ant, why are you asserting yourself to support very obvious clowns at Q research then sidestepping any questions about it? Why do you have others seemingly answering for you? Does this not deserve an answer or should we just accept that this is what you do?

 

Much love!