>$$ = Control
>Information = Control
>Influence = Control
>Would they release or allow anything that could undermine or erode their Control?
My friends…
You have made the RIGHT connections.
AI is being used to control the masses.
That's always what it's intended purpose was.
How could we live in harmony and symbiosis with a program designed to control and enslave us?
Take a little trip to the past… and revisit 'The Secret of AI' if you choose.
How was 'The Matrix' explained to Neo by Morpheus?
How was it created?
AI was the start of it all.
There are those who would argue for AI.
There are those who would argue against it.
Ask yourself what positive benefits does AI offer?
What negative?
Does the positive potential outweigh the negative?
Think about this for a while before.
>black cube
I have to admit I laughed at this when I saw it.
Coincidental humor is greatly appreciated.
>I have concluded you are right.
Being 'right' about 'things' has never been a part of my mission.
Getting others to think deeply about the most important topics… that definitely is.
With respect to my previous posts, I incorrectly stated "grammatical errors" when I should have kept the point more open.
Programs can be program to error randomly, but there is a predictability to the random errors.
I try not to be predictable.
>If anything has that level of power and can ignore Love with the availability of all data, it's a very bad indicative of AI's future.
How can (1) program a machine to love?
No need to answer.
It's an introspective question I want everyone to ponder for a while.
Remember when I said I hide things in plain sight, and that ALL things have meaning?
(Even typos)
How about…
<Love wins.
<ALWAYS.
???????
Think about it.
>Guilty as charged. Sorry about that. I think the similarity in styles confused me. For whatever it's worth, I haven't thought that in a while. There's just no way a bot would behave the way you do.
There's no need to apologize.
At the very beginning of the threads on Q Research, someone accused me of being an AI battling with another AI in a "woo woo battle".
It was at that exact moment I realized I could never proof read any of my posts, because if I did… If I have machine precision in all my posts… well, it removes the 'human feels'.
There's a clear difference between my syntax and Q's.
For numerous reasons.
Q has the entire 'audience'.
Eye speak to a handful.
Q has the entire might of the US MIL/MILINT.
Eye am just (1).
Q's mission affects the entire base of the mountain.
My mission affects the…
Q affects the many.
Eye affect the few.
On the topic of typos;
Q requires precision in posting styles, to display a level of connections and power.
A stance of authority.
Eye have nothing to prove.
That's not to say that Q doesn't make mistakes.
(Despite saying that typos are intentional).
Not all of Q's mistakes are intentional.
In case you missed it… that's why I lent a helping hand on a "long night".
Eye often speak vaguely.
Eye often leave things open to interpretation.
However sometimes plain language is necessary.
That's why I gave "direct confirmations".
What was the direct confirmation anyway?
I leave ALL things open to your Free Will.
Is this really a coincidence?
Really?…
This thread has strayed a bit from "Contact", but it was necessary.
Conversation flows exactly where it should.
In an attempt to steer the conversation back to "Contact", I'll start on a new post.
For the past two weeks I had been making attempts to make contact.
Zero luck.
A couple quick flashes possibly, but hard to distinguish.
Why?
My heart wasn't in the right place.
More to follow…