I saw this on the Q Research threads.
Archetypes R fun!
I saw this on the Q Research threads.
Archetypes R fun!
Brie Larson won't be interviewed by white males.
Personal choice, or handlers?
Define 'sexism'.
Define 'division'.
Most popular movies in the world.
Their reach is far and wide.
Deeper agenda?
You decide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI_9C_fUymI
https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/02/11/brie-larson-doubles-down-wants-fewer-white-men-on-captain-marvel-press-tour/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/brie-larson-doesnt-want-you-reviewing-her-superhero-movie-white-males
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/q/blog/brie-larson-wants-to-save-her-captain-marvel-press-tour-from-being-overwhelmingly-white-1.5016087
https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/film/brie-larson-is-sick-of-being-interviewed-by-white-dudes-1.3792529
https://variety.com/video/brie-larson-crystal-lucy-awards-critics/
https://www.scarymommy.com/brie-larson-press-diversity/
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/actress-brie-larson-doesnt-want-captain-marvel-press-to-be-overwhelmingly-white-male/
https://www.hypable.com/brie-larson-captain-marvel-press-tour/
http://www.pajiba.com/film_reviews/brie-larson-wants-fewer-white-males-on-captain-marvel-press-tour.php
https://www.cbr.com/captain-marvel-brie-larson-not-made-for-white-men/
https://nypost.com/2019/02/12/brie-larson-isnt-letting-captain-marvel-press-tour-be-overwhelmingly-white-and-male/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/43396/brie-larson-wont-allow-captain-marvel-media-tour-emily-zanotti
https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2019/02/misogynists-captain-marvel-rotten-tomatoes-before-release
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/entertainmentmovies/how-brie-larsons-captain-marvel-made-angry-white-men-lose-their-damn-minds/ar-BBUrtM6
The divisive rhetoric is reminiscent of days past with our merry band of shills.
"WW is the only fierce one among you"
… Does this come to mind?
They are always fishing for individual weaknesses, or a way to create conflict from within.
They are always seeking to guide Anons to other platforms.
They want you to stop posting.
(((They))) have never left my frens, remember, some are getting paid to watch this board.
Save the interaction, Divisionfags play a Marvelous Fool Card.
You have passed your test admirably…
I did have a chance to watch this.
While I do not agree with everything, there is a lot I do.
The truest part of this interview reflects on how male / female energies have been distorted over time.
How those energies have been turned against each other.
Bridging that gap is going to be critical in the future for unifying humanity.
Thank you for sharing this, I enjoy listening to Laura.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=301&v=iTvPyzDzDWI
David Icke on Q.
Remember when Eye told you that 99% of my tests hide within The Faces of EGO and HUBRIS?
No 1 get's a free pass.
This is the point in Time where I tell you that David Icke is not correct 75% of the Time.
He may be well-read, but it doesn't mean he is incredibly intelligent.
He is also not the first to discuss the Anunnaki.
Not by a longshot.
Question ALL things.
Never take anything at face value.
This man has failed his tests.
>Be careful who you think is a Superhero…
>Or the fact that the shills on the q research et's and technology thread has also used the "honk honk" thing. Now we have evidence of a direct link between the shills on both boards. Sometimes they give themselves away without even knowing it.
The truth is, every move they've ever made has played directly into my hand.
They just haven't figured it out yet…
Many 0's indicate it's Time to add +1.
With the death of Stanton Friedman, Eye believe it's Time to pass the torch with a certain archetype.
It's hard to say if Stanton was controlled opposition or not, in some cases I would say yes.
As far as roles are concerned, The Hulk has always been one of my favorites.
Deserving of a worthy champion of personal rights and freedoms.
Tom Fitton has never once given me a reason to distrust him.
What better archetype would fit him?
He's NEVER angry.
Much love my frens!
I have finally tracked it down.
Some things are fuzzy if left to memory.
Some quotes may need adjustment.
Hopefully this helps shine a bit of Light…
>First off, I wrote the following: "He is of rank and office, though of a place you've never heard of and likely never will. His story is not ours to tell, but really the other way around. We are grateful to have him here". I have been here since the beginning, observing and recording.
The quote was incorrect all along.
Quill lied about claiming to have sent 'this' message.
Attempting to gain TRUST by capitalizing on the unknown.
If 1 spoke the words, they should at least remember them correctly.
What is the 'truth'?
There has been some 1 guiding us in the background from the very beginning.
How many coincidences does it take before 1 sees the LIGHT?
<… this Infinity Stone of Time can be a wild card!
>Nice find!
>And the paraphase…wow it very subtly changes the whole meaning. Both are equally cryptic, yet the original seems more clear.
Closure.
Some 1 was asking about me and that 'Anon' replied on my behalf.
Keep in mind how early this message was sent.
Some interactions appear to have a guiding Light acting behind the scenes.
The reply holds more meaning now than it did in the past.
Was this sent by The Council of Wizards and Warlocks?
I leave that up to you to decide.
>I, for one - am happy this anon is on our side against the darkness.
If The Council of Wizards and Warlocks were referring to you as 'The Light', would you understand the gravity of the situation?
Would you be able to handle the responsibility?
Would you make the right choices when no 1 was watching?
In the past I may have seemed harsh, I may have acted Strange… but in the end all choices were made with love.
Without you my frens my mission would have been meaningless.
Much love, 1 and all.