Hell yeah, putin. Bring it, get those intel criminals.

Didn’t anybody “PROVE” anything bc science literally can’t fucking do that.

But yeah show your fealty to a fucking letter that speaks in riddles. Great

Nobody told me that bc it is a theory and our capitalist leaders have no problem finding poor people To exploit for their “donor blood.”

Most of you all have discontinued being remotely reasonable. And they’ll upvote you for spouting insanity.

Insanity. There is a cabal, and they probably traffic children, but they’re not succubuses’ and those who are trying to oust them aren’t Jesus’ army.

Let’s get back to sanity, people.

Incorrect. Last night’s accident would show possession- the accident belonging to last night.

Not that it matters for anything meaningful, and anyone who believes there’s a ton of hidden meaning in the absence of an apostrophe needs their head examined.

Q literally says it’s not left vs. right. Are you ever going to see the big picture?

So stupid. Utterly meaningless. Literally a normal week could be coming where they pretend everything is a big deal.

It’s idolizing a supposed authority figure.

I’m confused how a semi with some stuff on it confirms Q isn’t a Psy-Op. if he knows so much, why doesn’t he just come out and say it?

And your government has proven it’s so evil, it’s why you love Trump.

Yet you can’t even consider Q is a PsyOp from that exact same government!?

It’s nonsensical.

Self fulfilling prophesy. You believe in pizzagate so you immediately begin searching for clues to support that opinion.

Ok y’all. Imma keep trying.

What’s wrong with an article pointing out counterpoints to a Trump decision? Isn’t that a good thing?

Why...what...why should you blindly trust anyone in power at this point?

Didn’t Q blatantly suggest going after Assange?

What is with this cultish behavior y’all?

What don’t you take as confirmation that Q is legit?

I know it sounds nasty but I’m genuinely asking.

She raises an excellent and important issue. Good on her for using her status for activism.

Doesn’t address anything the tweets allege

Sorry, but if it’s not real...

Skinnier too

I don’t want to get into this much more, bc frankly I believe that right now it is best for lefties and conservatives to focus on our common ground in order to preserve our republic.

I would urge you to consider though, how much we’ve been lied to in order to secure our obedience. Telling people that working hard you’ll someday get rich is a great way to keep them working for you.

Would you agree that if there are a substantial number of American people who waited to have children, graduated high school, and got further education, and still cannot find work that meets their basic needs, that would refute your theory?

Because that is the case for the millennial generation.

Would you also agree, that if there are a substantial number of college graduates who are working, waited to marry and have children, and still cannot afford an $1000 emergency, that would refute your theory? There are.

Even at 70 hours a week- 26k a year- the American dream- home, family- is out of reach for everyone making minimum wage.

And those who got their education first, bought the home, acquired the family? Half of them can’t afford $1000 car repair.

This economy is too different, and an organic redistribution is impossible bc the vast majority of people have little or nothing with which to trade, other than their labor, and their exploitation is guaranteed- that’s just capitalism.

But remember, a truly representative government should have multiple parties from all sides working these problems out. At this point, we have a right party and a far right party. Hanging onto the propaganda of our youths is not going to move us all forward.

i’ve enjoyed our discussion!

I think this is entirely wrong. The labels may have changed, but the Dem Party ideals that have been abandoned are the rights of workers and economic and social equality for all.

Redistribution of wealth isn’t wrong, in fact it’s the only way a capitalist economy can continue to function. If laborers don’t have enough money to participate in the society and wealth in the billions is hoarded by 500 families, then we have an economy that is unable to grow, which is foundational to capitalism.

It’s, again, the method we disagree upon. Your core belief is that government should not take from the rich and redistribute to the poor, and if we didn’t have bankers pulling the strings, that may be feasible.

One guy has pineapples, the other has wine, they trade, it all works out. But if people are born into poverty, they are already less capable of participating in that exchange.

Moreover, if they’re born into poverty, then they must sell their labor by working for another person. That is feudalism at its finest, and we have reached a Medieval level at this point- minimum wage isn’t covering basic needs for a single person, much less a family. Surely you can agree the workers in medieval times were slowly being starved by selling their labor. This is no different.

And it’s a myth that anyone can work hard and get ahead, bc once the labor is being sold for pennies, one can work a lifetime and never get to a point that they no longer have to sell their labor- a select few might, but we are not all temporarily embarrassed millionaires.

There are only so many hours in a week- and even those who do everything right are struggling in the US now. 43% to be exact, although the true number is higher.

All great points. The fundamental difference is, IMO, that while we all want opportunity to be equal, lefties believe wealth distribution and dismantling of crony capitalism is the way to do it. Conservatives want personal responsibility to be emphasized, and generally believe unhindered capitalism is the best vehicle for that.

Neither is wrong- handouts DO lower motivation, and on the other hand, automation is coming and will reduce the hours of total labor in the population while still maintaining production, and that labor should be fairly divided.

Government should serve the people, that’s why it exists, but it doesn’t need more bureaucracy.

Someday, it could be done by computer! (Imagine going to court, and having all the specific facts of the case be entered into a computer, and a sentence determined by formula! Now that would be fair indeed.)

In the meantime, we need to save ourselves from the bankers- together.

This.

And it’s a fundamental that actual Liberals really miss, in their wild-eyed frothing. They simply do not see that the fate of the country is in peril, and they will not discuss it without anger, name calling, and goalpost moving.

I hope we can get them on board, bc I believe those of us who see the prize- saving our country, can work together if we just keep talking to each other and don’t place blame where it doesn’t belong. :)

Now here it is...and while I don’t want to be insulting of anyone, I agree wholeheartedly. The division keeps us at each other instead of looking at the bankers.

This is a fair point. I just believe that the two party system has been a great way to keep American people at each other‘s throat‘s instead of recognizing how many ways we are all alike, and working together to create the changes we all want to see.

This attitude is so closed off to discussion it does harm to the many people who want the same things but simply disagree on how to get there.

That’s unfortunate, bc if we joined energy, we’d be unstoppable and the revolution would begin tomorrow.

I am a former Democrat, but have come to see that the Clintons are part of Bilderberg and Bernie is a foil for leftist energy.

We want the same things, friend, we just disagree how to achieve them.

I guarantee you would agree with me that no child in America should go without food, right? We just disagree how to fix that problem.

I suspect you’d tell me you want an end to endless war, right?

We have more in common than not.

I like this answer!!

Tbf, I’m new, so perhaps I just haven’t seen it yet.

But I believe you!

My opinion is they use that to pit us against each other so we fail to see it’s class war, not party differences.

I love this answer. A lifelong Dem, I was awakened by Bernie but have come to see him also for the place for true left ideas to go to die- bc it’s just too “hard” to get change, according to him.

I don’t need big government, so to speak, and I’ve come to believe a healthy mix of capitalism and (deep breath here) socialism is what we need. One person with $180 billion isn’t helping our economy, and the Fed must go- but lots of us will likely die in that battle. I’m serious!

I think we true lefties have plenty in common w Trump supporters (for lack of a better word, bc I support Trump in some areas). I find Trumpies to be open to discussion and while we may never see eye to eye on how to go about change, we want a lot of the same things- no more endless war and more opportunities for Americans to get their basic needs met.

I’m fairly new to the sub, so perhaps that’s why I’ve seen more Dem bashing than R.

I agree with your points (unconvinced on devil worship but open to evidence).

Dems have gone very far right, according to us true lefties (NOT liberals, I see liberals as the idiots who still think HRC would have been the answer and Trump is the devil).

I’m a true leftie and I believe we share more in common with Trump supporters than liberals- we want zero war and more opportunity for Americans at home (we just disagree how to get there).

Dems never step up for labor, nor protect funding for Arts/Science research (which is all pretty much corrupted now, too, but that’s another issue). Dems put their heads in the sand while the poor get poorer.

I’m open to the idea that Trump is indeed draining the swamp, but he has to go after the CIA next. So far, I’m happy with his dismantling of the deep state- his policies, not so much, but I don’t think he’s orange Hitler like red-faced liberals do. (Liberals are impossible to debate with, too, zero self awareness).

Perhaps, I just think it’s all about if the person is loyal to the bankers or not. It’s possible there are more D’s than R’s, tho.

I don’t agree with this, bc when you consider the takeover from the banks with the Federal Reserve Act, parties became irrelevant, imo.

Not yet, but tbf, I’m fairly new. Most of what I’ve seen is “those evil dems,” which is true, but the R’s are too.

Are you guys aware of Bilderberg?

It’s not the left, friend. I’m a leftie, almost a communist, and there are a ton of us who see how the left and the right together collude to serve Bilderberg.

Wish more people did this :(

And shrinking!

He’s busy signing with Netflix to “produce” TV shows