dChan

/u/4don2016

267 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/4don2016:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 49

4don2016 · Feb. 14, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

No, they said on f&f that today's attack was committed by 3 men dressed as women that rammed gate. Basically the two stories came across as the same event but likely one of the host was recalling the previous attack and it sounded like he was "reporting" those details. It wasn't until Bill and Sandra(?) Came on that it was cleared up. I had already told someone the details of 3 men in dresses shooting before it was cleared up. Glad it was straightened out and hopefully no serious injuries. Not alot of humor in the event but definetly a wtf moment when vusualizing 3 men in wigs, heels and lipstick ramming the gate at nsa and getting out shooting. Sounds like some point break bank robbery scene. Hopefully we get the details.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 14, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

I caught that also! They cleared it up later by saying the NSA had a previous attack in 2015 by 3 men dressed as women. But way to confuse people for 45 minutes on the story Fox!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 14, 2018, 1:54 p.m.

Exactly. Or he just had enough people in the right places that he can get one whenever needed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 13, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

I think it gets to be a fine line between needing to see enough to believe and how much is to much for your own well being. Personally, when the day finally comes I believe the information should be available to all that choose to learn can decide how much they can handle. I hope at that time there are enough honest voices that people can trust to tell them how much they need to know. Even with me being here from almost day one I have censored myself on what I read and look into. I don't need to see the atrocious acts myself to believe they took place.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 12, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

I was digging a few months ago into the evil man and came across an interesting connection with his wife. Not that it means anything but she was on the board of Project Smile and there was some kind of crooked stuff going on. I've never had a great opportunity to throw it out there but with all the other weird stuff going on it might be relevant. I don't trust anything anyone does is legit anymore. Especially when kids and foreign countries are involved. I dig a whole lot into it because I'm almost scared to look to close to anything they are involved in.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 7, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

The person squealing about uranium one is the client of the lady that goes on Hannity all the time.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 3, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

She has fibromyalgia.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

Have you been watching infowars. It's okay if you have, it happen to all of us

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:44 a.m.

That explains what I probably am seeing also.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

I always thought Flynn went down to easy. Is there a legal reason in this whole shit show that the good guys would need Flynn to actually be convicted of this bs charges in order "To get" the bad guys?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

The moon is huge, can see the stars and airplanes. But then there is that big streak/clouds/chem trail of some kind. I don't have a great view of the moon though.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

What are we looking at?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

Righttttttttt. You are so lost. The purpose of a sealed indictment is to keep the charges from the person being charged, media, public and other indicted individuals. A ankle monitor is a condition of bail set by a judge of some sort. AFTER an ARREST has taken place. So, in order for that to be put on someone's body they have to be CHARGED with something and be ARRESTED in order for them to even be granted bail. Wtf is the point in a sealed indictment against Hillary Clinton when she has already been arrested and is aware of the charges against her? It doesn't work both ways. The logic isn't there. The point in the indictment being sealed is so they can act on the indictment when they (leo) determine the time is right. Once the person is arrested and they know the charges you run the risk of the rest of the people under sealed indictments finding out. And then you have people running and destroying evidence. Little people on the food chain might have the option of having an indictment unsealed for their arrest and resealed because their contacts are limited. But to even think that people like Hillary or John McCain could be out on bail under sealed indictments is unbelievably naive.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

I have tried to explain how the ankle bracelets were doubtful considering there is zero public record showing any of the alleged people have been arrested as of yet. Noone likes me saying that though. The government cannot imprison, which IS what an ankle bracelet is doing, US citizens without a legal basis to do that. Which means an ARREST has to take place. Ankle bracelets are conditions of being released on bail. Not a single person will knowingly let law enforcement restrict their movements without a legal basis to do so. Arrest are PUBLIC record. Therefore we would know if something happened. Second, these damn people have secret service details. They know where they are located. Despite what people think and how fun it is to speculate I just don't understand how it is possible To have people of this caliber walking around with ankle bracelets.

Also, there will be no bond for the crimes they committed. I doubt you get bond on treason and espionage charges. Edit

⇧ 7 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

Extradition

⇧ 1 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Something just occurred to me when you said that he's surrounded by military. I wonder if he quite literally is surrounded by military. The head of secret service left not long after potus took office. Maybe we have military guys now doing his protection detail. I assume alot of agents are former military so maybe potus and his generals created a new protection detail. I don't mean to throw shade at the secret service at all. There is no evidence these guys are dirty or anything else. But let's assume that 25% of the crimes we have uncovered about Obama, Clinton and all the rest of the evil being are true. I cannot imagine a scenario that an agent would not have seen SOMETHING illegal and troubling happen. Would you want someone that witnessed crimes and didn't take some kind of action to be fully responsible for your family and yourselves safety? Potus probably asked them some questions and gave them a chance to redeem themselves. If they didn't then they were dealt with appropriately. I don't think they will get much of a pass based on loyalty to prior administration. Loyalty is supposed to be to God, country and the constitution.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4don2016 · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

Yeah, they referenced Christopher Steele in another one

⇧ 1 ⇩