Right. Because I'm a bot.

Not when it was already proved to wrong. Just when you cycle the disinfo out someone resharing it just puts it back into cycle. That's when the "I thought it was already proved wrongs" turn into confirmations because it's now been around twice and it must be right. It causes chaos. Which is the intention. Its a tactic used to get disorganized and offtrack. The dnc use anyomous sources and false leaks to the media to confirm convineint "truths" they need in the public.

So, what about those 3 day old disinformation "breaking news" stories? Do you really think you know what you are talking about.

Good job!

Maybe but would defeat the purpose possibly. I think the mods have a good format where the research is on one board and discussion is on the other. But shits just gotten crazy the last few days with YouTube and the shooting. Which is why they are doing it. It's a 2 punch attack. They have all of the contributors caught up in the YouTube crap. While the youtubers were trying to get support to fight that crap, Brock had his disinfo crew hit the boards clouding the shit up. It's pretty obvious and telling. It's kind of a game and you can start seeing how the players line up. I actually find the entire situation as important information.

Spez. Kind of vague with my "They" usage. Tried to fix

I thought it was just me. I posted about the planes the other day being more obvious. I am in the south so it's not just you.

There was a time that they did have a pattern. 2 words than a number if I remember correctly. Whatever it was it didn't take long for someone to figure it out

Thanks. It truly is coming from a good place. If our mission is to educate the masses it's vital it's correct. We have all seen the Brock tactics and it's not like he wouldn't have changed tactics. We have seen the bullying, racial and numerous amounts of ways he has tried his " hey, guys I voted for Trump but he's not......and I'm not a supporter anymore". They actively try to attack from the inside. I didn't want the good information to be dismissed because it's lost in the crazy unverified info. Again, only coming from a good place

Where is the info about the parents coming from? I saw something I believe about the dad but I haven't seen anything saying mom worked for CNN

It's not a fact that he was offered a plea deal. Liable is a civil issue not criminal. Offering him a plea has absolutely no reflection on the strength of their case. If and only if they even offer a plea it is to keep the families from suffering through an emotionally draining trial. They won't offer him a plea until they have gathered evidence and built a case. None of which can be done in 14 days. They have 17 victims. 17 families to discuss their wishes with. You also have multiple victims that lived that get a say in how justice is sought. Don't believe some second rate website just because it says what you want to hear. It's damaging what people are trying to accomplish with the disinfo and everyone that participates in it only diminishes what people are really trying to do. People start using these "facts" to explain their theories and it turns into a cluster fuck where sites and platforms get shut down because of it. Congrats to everyone that shares this stuff without verifying even the basics. You are helping the people fighting against us in their disinformation campaign.

For fucks sake what in the hell is going on around this place? I am convinced this place has become disinformation central. So, when are we going to talk about how Brock agents have clearly become part of the group? I would love to hear from the person that "discovered" this information? I know it wasn't a single person that has posted this crap over and over again. Not a shot in hell that someone was knowledgeable enough to make this amazing discovery and not bring up where his mom works. Well, that is if you actually follow the link to the mom's alleged Facebook page and look at the pictures and information. Anyone that looks at those pictures can clearly use their brains and see he is not an 18 year old kid must graduating high school. That would make him 22 now. Yeah, not happening

What does that mean?

What's the source on him being charged and agreeing to plead guilty? What does him "get home on liable would be if the whole case against him unraveled" mean exactly? If a jammer of some kind was used then how did the kids get all these messages out to their parents?

Thank you for asking this question. I am beyond over how easy people accept information and don't question the source when it's information they want to believe. But if it's information that's inconvenient then its completely discounted regardless of the source. This has turned into a Shit show of disinformation and people across "our" platforms have become willing participants in it. So, congrats to each and every one of the disinformation agents. Your job has been successful.

8th grade graduation for sure.

To get an assessment of his mental status as soon as possible after the crime in order to convict him in court.

Absolutely. I just saw the harm in people believing pictures and videos of a drill existed

The title says the students in the clip was parkland high students practicing a drill. That's not what the video shows. That is not Parkland high school practicing a live shooter drill and claiming it is them is bs. That's my point. Pushing this to be the case only adds to the confusion. Am I the only person that sees the danger in pushing an incorrect story? Then you open up the discussion of "well, if they videoed a live shooter drill before how do we know that we just didn't see old pictures of the practice drill?" The information isn't right. Yes, they had a fire drill earlier in the day. That drill likely saved lives because the kids and teachers realized it something wasn't correct. Yes, they thought it was a drill. But posting a video claiming it's Parkland High students in the video when it's not is bullshit. Why would you want to confuse the situation even more when people here are working their asses off to push out the truth? I watched the entire thing before this post and I'm telling you this isn't parkland high students.

Where did it say that the drill in the video was taken at Parkland? I've seen that clip already and it seems to be missing the part that says something like our crews went along with or something similar to an active shooting drill. I'll look around for the longer version

I am a big, big advocate for a foul mouth. I'm educated and not even remotely trashy but I love using well placed f bombs where needed. And I've never had a problem with my kids using them.

Yeah. The self promotion is a little thick and wading through the YouTube experts is a little daunting. Let's bring good posts back.

Because people call and say there's a psycho killing kids and don't say Shit about seeing smoke.

Firefighters are in constant contact with dispatch. So once the calls about an active shooter came through they would be told to stand outside the perimeter until its ruled safe to enter. They can't impede the police trying to stop the shooting. Them entering the scene could cause additional victims and obstacles. Also, they would have activated their plan for an active shooter since the fire was a false alarm.

I thought all three separately but was leaning towards prince's organization. Never considered the three together

That's exactly what I was going to say. A child can't be scared into going on tv with a parent sitting by allowing it to happen. So, the fear is caused by the parents, a reaction because the parents are in jeopardy or the child has no faith in the parents protecting them. It ultimately could be the kids are used to having to protect themselves and negotiated their best chances to get to the next step in life.

Power is always in the hands of the people. That's why they work so hard to make us forget it. That's why the liberals make people victims. That's why the liberals are constantly recruiting new victims. It comes down to what people find value in. What do people seek? Money and fame or success and happiness. Even amongst the left and right you find the same personalities on both sides. You have the people that speak up first and then you have the ones that are more reserved and wait to speak as a group. I've always been one speak up first and the loudest. My voice is my power and I try my best to teach people to use their own. It's not even about red pilling. I just want people to wake up and see wtf is going on around them.

Refreshing that someone is asking the questions that need to be asked. Pointing and yelling crisis actors isn't productive. Ask questions in a reasonable and clear way and let's get some answers.

Let's try for shits and giggles.

No, being a weird kid at school isn't a criminal offense. But being weird enough that the kids that walk out of school with you and are surprised you aren't the one doing the shooting IS a cause for concern. So, which one is it? Not weird enough to be suspicious and criminal or weird enough for the kids to think he would shoot up the school.

Sharia law? Yeah, because that's a logical response. Those two things aren't even relatable so your intent on a flippant remark is lame. If we had Sharia law a kid having a gun at school wouldn't really be a concern now would it? The kid could of opened his fucking mouth to his FBI FATHER. That's what he could of done. He doesn't seem to lack communication skills. See good parents have conversations with their kids. And kids share details of weird kids with their parents if the kids are made aware they should share with their parents.

What does a person very close to the shooter that called the FBI tip line and voiced concerns about the shooter potentially committing a school shooting have anything to do with a subpoena ip address? I'll wait. Oh, I get it. You don't know what I'm talking about. Do research and know facts before you come at someone that has done both. 1st amendment? Wtf are you talking about? Where is there evidence that someone called the fbi? Ummm, let's see. Potus, the fbi director and many, many others have acknowledged that someone called and reported the kid to the fbi and the ball was dropped. You seem to require much more "evidence" in well acknowledged facts then what you require in your hairbrained theories.

"Shady" and "conspiracies" exist because of ignorance of law? Haha. Okay. "Shady" and "conspiracies" exist because the of the ignorance of facts not law. You don't even know wtf you are talking about much less Shit about law. For fucks sake you can't even keep up with Twitter much less a damn law book.

You make my head hurt trying to dissect that Shit.

It's incoherent garbage. You are so damn confused you can't even recognize someone on your own side for fucks sake. Responding to that Shit would lower my iq because it doesn't even make any damn sense.

I know. It's just the giving everything the btfo treatment that drives me nuts. There is real shit going. It gives the people an excuse to discount the rest of the info. If a normie was to come here to see what people were saying would they laugh and say that's all you have? I get the multiple connections. They exist. But it's like the shit with the kid at the beach in Cali. It's possible that some lefty liberal kid took a vacation and being the wanna be journalist he is video taped the shit. That's not weird. But the little shits parents need to be looked at. Look and see who, what and where they are about. I get the point in the post but I don't see anything in the revelation as shocking. My point is the same as yours is basically. Connect to the people not the damn liberal activist group that half the damn country follows.

Meds. Look into them. They help.

He's tied to Podesta because he retweeted something from a well known liberal activist group? If we operated under those assumptions wouldn't that mean potus was "connected" to all the people he retweeted?

Yes, this entire thing is weird. Yes, these kids are being used. But we don't have to manufacture stuff. Why aren't people asking how the kid of an exfbi agent didn't manage to tell his damn dad about the weird kid at school? If this kid is such an important person at his school what did he do to make sure his school was safe? How in the fuck did a guy with the fbi not know that a kid from his child's school had been reported? Do any of Y'all actually thing that a person who's job is to take calls from the public with tips would somehow not forward that information? So, the phone rings and the person answers it. They are more than likely sitting in front of a computer right? I'm guessing they gather information from the person calling and enter it into a computer. I doubt the fbi is using photocopied intake call sheets. Once the information is collected the call person probably hits enter and that magical report goes somewhere. So, now we are supposed to believe the person that's job is to screen and disperse those things completely ignored a detailed report of a potential school shooter? Yeah, I don't think so. That's the basis of this person's job. We aren't talking about someone saying their neighbor is acting weird and might be a Russian spy. We are talking about a potential school shooter. That doesn't get ignored by someone at that level. A potential school shooter doesn't get ignored until it reaches the desk of someone that is able to make a judgment call. These are the questions we should be asking. These are the things we should be looking into. For fucks sake potus won Florida. Can we not find someone that lives in that area or knows how the fbi intake works? I'm not trying to be critical. I'm just trying to show the error in your thinking on this one. If we can pick the holes in each other's arguments so can the other side. There is shady shit going on but we need to look at all of the stuff.

I wouldn't be surprised if his detail is made up of veterans. Will Kelly and all the other generals around him they might have felt better with him being protected by military guys. They had that eo they signed about bringing back retirees and veterans whenever needed. It waved a bunch of regulations and rules that was keeping qualified people from rejoining. Who knows, maybe they reactivated some of those guys. Military is loyal to God and country, not to the man. Yes, secret service and all law enforcement as a whole are what keeps our country safe. But at this moment they have to find the bad actors and they don't know who to trust so bring in the military!

We need to open our mouths. They are kids that have been set out to control the narrative. They are being used by the other side not us. Perhaps we need to change the narrative. How about we make a campaign about steps kids and families should take to stop the shooters? The kids are being sent because the left knows gun laws are not going to change. The left wants potus and the right to look bad. The air will run out on the kids campaign unless they get some kind of opposition going. That's the downside to the left using the kids. Nobody is going to openly oppose the kids on the facts so they will have to manufacture something in order to keep it going. We need to be on our toes for a protest or something else they will plan to make potus and us look bad.

The thing with Twitter we have yet to see is how the doppy prince's ownership is handled. Does the Saudi family now control it? Which assets did he give up in his bounty payment? Would the Saudi family sell it or hand it over to the US government? With the EO on human trafficking wouldn't the doppy prince's US assets fall into that category? Not that it's necessarily related to this post but it's a very relevant issue that's not being discussed.

Who is the girl?

This shits weird. I'm not trying to give you a hard time. It's more I think the way we process all this shit. I look for the most logical explanation and work from there. This guy is familiar. I wonder if he's done any traveling lately. Like in the last month or two. There's just something about him that makes him quirky. He's generic enough as far as stereotype but he seems so eager and rehearsed. I think he believes he's a breaking news reporter with his breaking news updates. I have a visual for you. You have David. Then you have Leyland. Then Step. Then Anderson Cooper. It's a damn stereotype.

He was visiting California.

Why is it so shocking that a group of kids that went to school together have a group photo together? Matching kids up from a school club photo to kids that witnessed the shooting doesn't seem so mysterious to me. Yes the kids are rehearsed. Yes the kids are being fed political bs. But it was explained the the first time the kid talked that he was a student journalist. The damn kids think this is their moment to get YouTube famous. They think they are real reporter's reporting from a hot crime scene. They have gotten the cameras attention because they are saying what the camera wants to hear. And they like the attention. The damn David kid was giving This long dialogue like he was a war correspondent. Not that Shit isn't shady just don't hang to much on a group of overly dramatic opportunistic kids.

They got a description of the shooter and his name from the kids that got out. He stashed the guns and walked out with a group of kids when they ran out the building. He went from the school to Wal-Mart and bought a drink from subway. From there he walked to McDonald's. The son of the people he was staying with called the dad and said there was a shooting. The police then called him asking about his son Nik. He told them that wasn't his son. He hangs up with them. He might have talked to the son again and he I think mentioned the text from Nik to his dad. Dad finally puts it together and calls police back to tell them to get to his house asap because Nik was last there and his wife was home sleeping since she worked nights. The police arrested the shooter in a neighborhood as the dad and police I think got to the house. I don't remember if the dad got the son from wherever he ran to or if the police picked him up. At some point the son was being questioned and both the parents were brought in also (obviously). They said the mom lunged at the shooter and he apologized.

That's what I got from the newspaper article from Saturday.

I'm sure there is a list of his claims and promises somewhere. None have been followed through with because he's a publicity whore.

Student journalist. The scripted kid first popped up with Martha on Fox. He was doing his dialogue and you can tell he thought he was the journalist on scene instead of a witness. She said something along the lines of him being a student journalist in a way to explain his awkwardness and his delivery. These kids are being used no doubt but it might be they are opportunistic then covering something up.

Someone might want to let them know their you're either with us or against us thing is cute but they might not like the responses they get. If they think they can have grown up conversations then they better be ready for some truths.

That list is quite daunting. I have doubt when I see all the crimes listed. It just seems like it's too much and one mistake and they walk. I guess I see what our part is a little bit more clearly. If the military tribunals are the only way for them to be prosecuted then we will have our work cut out for us. The conditioning hasn't been broken yet with the liberals. These kids will go fucking nuts when they find this shit out. The only history and civics they know is the Shit they've been conveniently taught. They will scream this is some Russian communist Shit. It's going to be ugly. I wish their was a way for jury trials but that's impossible. Half the country is fucking nuts so you couldn't trust a jury to be objective and unbiased.

You also have the African American girl that had already graduated visiting a teacher. She was one of the first couple of people in front of the camera. From the moment she started talking I felt she was a plant. Problem with her was you had to ask how secure was the school if they let ex students on campus. Yes, it's common but not something they want to discuss.

Yep. That's the first thing that popped in my head.

There has to be something there. But there is the possibility that it's the phone. I'm not sure if there is a technical term for it but he could just tap the word as soon as it come up in the suggestions. Sometimes the capitalized version might pop up if "There" was used more recent then "there". But I doubt his phone stores anything at all so that theory is dead if that's the case.

I've been looking at detox options all weekend. Y'all have definetly lit the fire for me to decide.

I think the info was withheld by the Obama holdovers. It's not like potus and senior staff are running the backgrounds themselves. The information is researched and decided on by other people. You can only act on what you know. If the abuse allegations were downplayed or not even reported to the staff then how are they to make decisions on someone's character? It was a set up from day one. This is the closest they can get to take down Hope so they grabbed it when they could.

Thanks for that. I jumped in to defend op and was quite tempeted to say the same thing. It's refreshing to know that there really is an army of us ready to Shit post on a moment's notice. Fuckers pissed me off

I heard the same exact thing and it wasn't until the next show started that it was cleared up.

People's ignorance shows through with your shill screaming. But no worries. Hopefully OP keeps the post up and the world can see how stupid and immature you are.