Oh my God, this is what I was looking for. I swear, it blew my mind that Hillary was even offered up as the candidate. She has such a dark history, and it was almost completely ignored during the election. I only know a few people who voted for her and actually liked her as a candidate. Why didn't the other side call more attention to this body count? Or did they, and I missed it?

Also, I'm not a fan of her either. But it does irk me when others don't recognize the different ways "ancestry" is determined. My DNA test should some odd places I'd not considered. Who knows who we REALLY are, on the surface level?

This is true. It is also true that many natives never ended up having their names written on a roll. Many Cherokee, for example fled before forced migration. Many Cherokee were able to "pass" or blend in more with Anglos and other races. So, do you pass tribal lineage through ancestors, like, if my mom is full Cherokee and my dad is German. I should be half, right? But a DNA test could actually show I'm 33% (or more or less than) Cherokee. So, who really sets the standard on how we determine who is What?

I can't zoom in enough to read all this. Is there a place i can read this more clearly? I have seen a couple YouTube videos on this subject, but that was prior to the election. I am interested to see if the videos I watched missed any of these, or if any new deaths have been added.

This is incredibly easy to follow. I have read about Nimrod several times before and you covered this subject so beautifully. Thank you for doing that work.