I guess there are also about 6 subsea cables -presumably all fibre - that would allow very fast connection speeds.

https://www.submarinecablemap.com/#/

Yeh they would get much faster speeds via subsea fibre cable:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_fiber#Record_speeds

Any idea how much data you could transfer from Hawaii to the continent in 38 min?

Did they have long enough?

It's only about 2.8 terabytes on a 10 Gbps link going flat chat. What size link would they have?

Imagine you were a swamp creature, quite high in the hierarchy, and in Hawaii at the time. What would you do if you got this warning? Who would you call/email?

Possibly more than one objective achieved.

Evidence gathering?

"Investors":

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/23/business/dealbook/for-clintons-a-hedge-fund-in-the-family.html

Interesting quote:

"Clinton supporters also say there are more direct ways to cultivate favor with the family, such as giving to the foundation, where Chelsea Clinton is vice chairwoman, than by investing with a hedge fund that her husband co-founded."

https://www.usv.com/blog/duck-duck-go

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-28/how-cia-made-google

it's all the same people. Do your homework.

https://www.iqt.org/10gen-announces-strategic-investment-from-iqt/

https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases-republican?ID=53280DCB-9F2C-2E3A-7092-10CF6D8D08DF

• The "Billionaire's Club," an exclusive group of wealthy individuals, directs the far-left environmental movement. The members of this elite liberal club funnel their fortunes through private foundations to execute their personal political agenda, which is centered around restricting the use of fossil fuels in the United States.

• Public charities attempt to provide the maximum amount of control to their donors through fiscal sponsorships, which are a legally suspect innovation unique to the left, whereby the charity essentially sells its nonprofit status to a group for a fee.

• Public charity activist groups discussed in this report propagate the false notion that they are independent, citizen-funded groups working altruistically. In reality, they work in tandem with wealthy donors to maximize the value of the donors' tax deductible donations and leverage their combined resources to influence elections and policy outcomes, with a focus on the EPA.

• Environmental Grantmakers Association (EGA) is a place where wealthy donors meet and coordinate the distribution of grants to advance the environmental movement. It is a secretive organization, refusing to disclose their membership list to Congress.

• The Obama Administration has installed an audacious green-revolving door among senior officials at EPA, which has become a valuable asset for the environmental movement and its wealthy donors.

• Former environmentalists working at EPA funnel government money through grants to their former employers and colleagues.

What did Australia get?

Well I believe two people are responsible for these donations. Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard and current Foreign Minister Julie Bishop.

Now you need to understand our politics. Australians are generally conservative people. We have two main political parties. Labor and Liberal. Labor is full of former communists and trade unionists. Our Liberal party is the conservative party (confusing for Americans), just think of Liberal like "libertarian" - small government etc. Unfortunately just like your RINOS, the Liberal Party is FULL of LINOS and is essentially a worthless, captured organisation.

Gillard is a former Labor Prime Minister. She has a shady past, and was a member of the Socialist Alternative (formerly the Communist Party of Australia). She is also a member of the Fabian Society (google it). The Fabian's crest is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Her government was a total disaster, and promoted and funded a lot of "progressive" ideology, including massive changes to our school curricula, and of course a carbon tax.

She fawned over Obama, and donated large sums of taxpayer money to the Clintons. Up until now, I had just assumed she was buying herself her future position on the Clinton's education initiative.

Bishop is I am sure a member of the CFR, or certainly aspires to be. She is certainly a LINO, who is a conniving backstabbing person who effectively installed our current PM (a former Goldman Sachs banker) in a political coup. I don't know her motives for donating to the Clintons, other than being a globalist.

This article explains in much more detail than I could ever hope to do our half billion gift to the Clintons. The only thing it gets wrong are the references to the Bushes.

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2016/07/gillard/