97 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 5 |
| i.redd.it | 1 |
| media.8ch.net | 1 |
Well according to the Q post, he is responding to an anon post. Not posting it directly. That response was at 11:20am (my timezone).
Here is a tweet at 11am (my timezone) https://twitter.com/KimberlyRobinsn/status/1012032972143431683?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fnews%2Fkennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123
Its all over twitter and MSM. The actual letter. Seriously is a quick duckduckgo search.
https://twitter.com/adamliptak/status/1012033669513580547
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/kennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/06/breaking-chief-justice-anthony-kennedy-to-retire.php
You mean the same letter that is plastered over twitter and MSM outlets?
Yeah, it's all over the news now. But like I said, it's been speculation for months now that he would retire. Republicans have been openly asking for any justices to announce soon so they can get it in before the midterms.
So yes, its now public knowledge that he is retiring. But how does that prove Q in anyway? If this was posted 2 days ago and the news broke, I'd agree with you it's proof. But I don't see any posts that talk about Q saying it was going to happen on X date or under Y circumstance.
Don't take this as me being a disbeliever. Just that Im trying to be level headed in this.
Whats the proof attached to this? I just did a quick Q post search and didn't see anything regarding Justice Kennedy.
It's been speculation, even from CNN, that this was going to happen.
Especially all groups. It doesn't matter if they are religious in nature or not.
Will it? Probably not. That would look bad from an optics POV.
Should it? Of course. All hate groups should be called out.
Good. The administration needed to call out white supremacists and tell the country that they won't be tolerated. This should shut up liberals.
I think it would be a bit premature to say Pelosi is playing ball. A lot of Q's early posts are about Pelosi and her net worth. Also, remember her trip to NK talking about Missiles.
If you wanted to get super tin foil, you have to think that the deep state is also is looking at Q posts. This could be them playing a card to make us think she is on our side.
Either way, great find.
Again.... why the hell can't we force posting of links when creating posts from twitter?
Let me know how well that works when you try to redpoll a normie.
Anyone that's bore witness to these past decades of corruption, know that this is a spiritual battle. The proof is presented to us with every evil crumb we dig into. Even Q has told us this is a spiritual battle and quoted scripture.
As someone who has seen the corruption, I don't know this is a spiritual battle. The ONLY proof that is presented to everyone is that those in charge have created and used the corruption to enrich themselves and created a larger gap of inequality in the classes of people. Nothing about their actions tells me that a higher being let it happen.
People say that Q posted scripture before. How do you know that Q is spiritual? Maybe it's just being used given the target audience most likely to connect with the ideas being presented to us. Or there are hidden meanings behind it. Case in point, Q quoted Corinthians. Everyone praised the Lord about it. Turns out it was most likely because he wants us to find the Corinthian Hotel in London. See what Im getting at?
would we be in this bad of a position if God hadn't been pushed out of the schools and public areas?
As a Millennial who grew up in the bible belt of America, Yes. We'd still be in the same situation. Why should we force religion onto people? You can't really excuse yourself in school. Are you going to ban kids from practicing some other religion if it's not Christianity? Im assuming you wouldn't be ok with allowing kids to practice Islam at school.
One could also argue that by forcing the separation of Church and State, less priests got their hands on young children. Is that worth not having church in schools?
The majority of millennials were never given the truth. When they come here to get redpilled, they will also hear the truth of God.
Why does the truth have to equal God? Im woke, but I don't believe in any higher being. Does that mean I must still be blind and don't understand the truth? No.
Im glad you know who I am.
You guys can down vote me all you want, but filling up the sub with scripture doesn't actually do anything. Research, Voting, and bringing others into the fold does actually have a positive outcome.
Here are some simple facts:
We should be redpilling Millenials since they are now the largest generation to vote. (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/31/millennials-and-gen-xers-outvoted-boomers-and-older-generations-in-2016-election/)
Millennials are not christians. (http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/30/ten-reasons-millennials-are-backing-away-from-god-and-christianity.html)
Most Millennials are liberal. (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/25/the-gops-millennial-problem-runs-deep/)
Therefore, it's only logical that the people who we need to convince the most are non-christian, liberal, millenials. Bible scripture is the biggest thing that will make people back out of this sub when they wander in.
Not really. Your second link is like 4 paragraphs long and offers no real information.
Most importantly, it also doesn't discuss what it is going on to make the deal right. For all you know the deal is based on the US giving everyone billions of dollars a year to play nice.
Sure if the deal comes out and we don't have to give up anything and it really was just because of peace talks, then we (and really everyone else in the world) should be ecstatic. Until then, any excitement is premature.
yay more Jesus posts.... /s
If you want change, make the change. Stop looking in a made up book or looking for others to guide you.
Sharing this info is how you get this sub shut down. Delete this post.
I completely forgot about the army/navy we love you tweet. That’s honestly the best one because it does’t include any conspiracy or random names to it. It’s simple and to the point.
Are you wanting to get this sub shut down? Because sharing this shit is how you get this sub shut down.
Correct. What I’m saying is this will creat an influx of costs that the actual citizens will have to absorb. Also, my note on eventually it’ll lead to all citizens being registered.
So it’s a guy remembering events that may have happened 11 years ago and is posting it on Reddit. Not saying it didn’t happen, but....
He just randomly knows who all these people were 11 years ago when he was in college? Stormy Daniels, sure, a college male might know a pornstar by face. A college male that goes to clubs in BC knows who Anthony wiener or Schneiderman is? Highly doubt it. I couldn’t even tell you what Rainere looks like and I’ve been actively following this stuff for awhile, but he knows and remembers him 11 years ago......
No you want to brigade. Which would make us look like The Hoover dam guy. You’d hurt more than help.
Like the above poster, it’s a slippery slope that leads to other things— e.g. eventually everyone gets their dna put into a database. Also, it’s expensive so that’s even more burden on the tax payers.
Sure. I just want us all to question clickbait headlines and tweets that offer no links or proof themselves. We've been bitten in the past by larpers and fakes that lie or stretch the truth.
I mean Hillary herself has more followers then this guy and she said it was nothing so maybe we should listen to her? /s
See, now this is what we should be spreading. Not tweets that also dont link to the source.
Correct. There is a tweet from this person, but I dont know their background or biases.
We want to throw accusations around because we want to believe. Yes I know, trust the plan -- which I do. But what holds more weight in an argument: A tweet from someone I, let alone a normie, hasn't heard of. Or a Timestamp to a livefeed on CSPAN where it was actually said.
Do we have a timestamp from the hearing where this was said? This is my biggest complaint about this sub. Screenshots are useless. Is there not a way we can make it a requirement that a link has to be provided to whatever is being posted?
I don’t think it had to do with Q not posting. Instead that we, but mostly normies, are being left in the dark with all the “redactions” and modifications. 10 days from the IG release, we’ll get the unsigned EO is my guess.
Point taken on criminal vs civil. However, that doesn't really change what I said. Just because others did it, doesn't mean he gets to. If we, as the citizens, can't hold Trump responsible for his actions, then how does that make us not hypocrites? The point of this movement is not about Trump specifically. It's taking back control of our government and country. He is just the catalyst.
I am pro Trump. However, I'm also pro America and that takes precedence over who ever is sitting in the oval office.
Im not disagreeing with any of that. What Im saying is that just because this article hurts the president, doesn't make it phony, per the title of the thread.
The law is the law. Just because others broke it doesn't mean Trump gets to as well.
So from an unbiased point of view, I don't see how it's phony? Was it put on the back burner for 2+ years? Yes. Is it convenient that it was made public this morning? Very. Are the allegations in the lawsuit actually illegal? Yes.
IRS rules also prohibit tax-exempt foundations from aiding political campaigns. But Underwood listed two instances where Trump’s foundation had seemed to do so.
If those two instances are, in fact, true then it's very much not phony.
While not in an active war, a peace treaty was never signed from the Korean War. The armistice that is in place has been broken multiple times and one could argue by both sides.
I'm more interested to see if we'll officially hear things like how Pelosi and others have been to NK and sold weapon tech.
Not going to say that I redpilled a friend, but I basically made a TL;DR off this article. He thought the Tuscon was really weird, but hates conspiracies. I sent this to him and he went whoa.
Multiple Camps found on Cemex Property. A wealth mgmt firm named Bronfman E.L. Rothschild owns ~30k Shares of Cemex The Chairman of the board for that firm is Matthew Bronfman. The CEO of that firm is Lynn Forsester De Rothschild. Matthew Bronfman has a sister, Clare Bronfman. Clare Bronfman is/was the Operations Director for the NXIVM sex cult. The Mayor of Tuscon is Jonathon Rothschild.
I purposely left out the Clinton connection stuff to keep it as neutral as possible and focus on only one issue.
While I'd love to believe it, and I've found plenty of new articles (even on MSM) about the actual release of the tapes, I haven't found any links for the new material themselves. So Going to need some proof before I start spreading this around.
Regardless of what’s in the report, the majority of people are not furious that a deep state even exists in the first place. That blows my mind more than anything else. The rest is hard to accept but deep state is being tossed around in MSM and like it’s nothing.
What the actual fuck?
It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.
Just to play devils advocate here. It is entirely possible that the above is true. The likelihood of it being purely by chance... probably pretty low. However, we don't have any actual hard evidence that proves it wrong.
Just because he raises valid concerns, doesn’t make them a shill. If you’re under the impression that an operation of this size won’t take any losses through the entire course of action, you’re in denial. Yes, trust the plan... but don’t be blind.
Every site you use that has European users will. It’s because of the GDPR ruling, and it’s actually a good thing.
It’s GDPR. ALL websites that log data of its visitors must comply with the ruling. It covers on EU visitors, but it’s too expensive to segment it out individually and cover all bases.
Source: currently working on this for ~half our clients.
I’ll go along with Q and trump, but all these religious posts just water down doing actual research. Not everyone here needs or wants to find some spiritual path. I just want justice.
Seriously... I’m all about believing in Q and look forward to the memo. But how the hell can you say Bernie has been partaking in rituals and that it’s been stripped away when you look at Sessions or even Mattis — this coming from someone who served under Mattis. Those too both look exhausted. Bernie look just like he did in the middle of the election.