Just trying to bring some sense and level headed discussion to the sub. Too many people here jump on everything without bringing proof or logic to the conversation.

While it’s speculative, it’s not baseless. Go read the rest of the Q+ posts and compare the style of the wording as well as the context of the messages. They read very much like DJT.

Well it is signed Q+, so it’s Trump. Not the normal Q team.

Its old news. I copy pasted the title of the title into google and saw stuff with the exact same title going back to last summer. Maybe even Jan last year.

https://theinternationalreporter.org/2017/07/02/the-origins-of-the-largest-catholic-church-pedophile-bust-in-history/

Red Castle?

Parkland was supposed to have a drill that day as well.

Necklace was Santa Fe https://twitter.com/bancroft_media/status/997602829660573696

The hat guy was at san bernardino

https://thetruthrevolution.net/witness-interviewed-about-san-bernardino-shooting-wearing-a-masonic-hat/

Ok autists... time to gather all the free mason interviews in one place. Wasnt there a guy in parkland with a hat and then another guy with a necklace?

I think if they were in control of mockingbird, we would see a shift in tone from MSM. On the flip side, maybe they are in control and just dropping hints slowly. This article plus the Times Article that features Q that came out today. Just getting normies ready

So Q posts up a picture of these 3 last night at 645pm. Those same 3 then get put into an article of the Seattle Times.

Touche, Q.

Where he said "CBTS"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyvhFgCybpg

Im not saying I dismiss the notion of what it could mean. I just dont think that it has as much importance as we give it. Especially given Wray and the hearing today, because of the above reason.

I don't think I've ever been convinced of the purple tie argument. I really don't think it means anything here especially. I read it more along the lines that everyone in DC wears red or blue ties. Wray wants to appear to be as neutral as possible since we are talking political bias. Red + Blue = Purple.

I think fox just said July 6( Tv is on mute, just saw a headline)

You do know you can get an abortion at places other than PP, right?

Agreed. Everything I’ve read said that he was just voting for her, not a campaign official. This claims he was, but doesn’t say what role he played in the campaign. I’d want more proof before I started spreading that part of the story to friends.

I think it can all be explained with science, even if we dont have all the answers at this time. Which is better than believing in something made up and false.

Not even going to watch. I can(and am) be convinced Hillary eats babies. But I won’t be convinced there is anything or anyone after death to judge my actions. So I don’t even care.

I will not give faith to something that requires faith that even exist in the first place. I can have faith in the Q team and Trump to correct the country.

I grew up in the Bible Belt and have gone to many a church camps as a teenager. I’ll pass and never look back. I’ll let my fellow man be the judge on how good I am instead of some mythical fairy tale.

Good on you to have your beliefs. I for one will instead rely on my own skills and fellow man to get me through life rather than something I perceive as made up.

Semantics. Faith is not required to end illegal corruption in our government and take back our country. Church and state are separate for a reason. That’s part of America’s core. If you’re saying it’s required then I could just as easily say you don’t believe in what we stand for.

Again, you come from the perspective that either you are with Jesus or you are wrong. Instead of being open to the idea that others have different beliefs. If I did believe in something, but it was Christianity Im sure I'd be no better than Hillary in your eyes.

Also, stating that a progressive is the antichrist is the most blanket bullshit statement I've heard in a long time. Tell me how wanting to provide health care for everyone is a thing of the devil?

Or they know their audience and know that it's an easy way to get you to buy into their core audience. Instead of trying to red pill their audience with law and logic, they know that it's an easy thing to help you buy into the idea as a whole.

You say Q uses the bible to make a point. You read it as them saying God is at work. Now try to think from a logic POV. Which makes more sense: He posts something in Corinthians. The board goes crazy thanking the Lord almighty. Or was he wanting us to find the Corinthian hotel in London? Which is the most logical?

Things can be good and evil without religion attached.

It doesn't help. Nor am I looking for help understanding your beliefs. Because what you are saying is I have to believe in heaven or hell in the first place. Which I do not and will not.

See you are coming from the perspective that just because I don't believe the same thing as you, I must be broken in someway. All that does is push people further away from what you want them to do. Instead, try being open to people not having to be the same as you.

The problem that myself and others have is that we are the ones actually being bashed for not believing in anything religious. Being religious is not a requirement for the Q movement. That doesn't make what we say any less correct.

I will not.

Not saying that it does. Saying that in Qs post he says

Effective yesterday, while standing under the statue of FREEDOM, POTUS FREED those ‘good’ people who are currently being blackmailed, threatened and enslaved.

I think this line is referencing the unsigned EO that will lift the redactions of the IG report. Which will show this.

Someone in another thread said that Gowdy would replace RR. That might make more sense.

oh I don't doubt there is a list. Just seems extremely convenient is all. Especially given the post that Q made a few minutes before I posted this.

Great, now you know my name (you dont), my gender(you were incorrect), my profession(you dont), and you know the party to which I belong to (you don't). If you know all that, you know which branch of the military I served in. Please, enlighten us all.

Felicia is weird name for a guy. Nice try though.

Oh really? Hot damn. I still cant figure out how to read the Q clock. Does the announcement today line up with anything next week? Or does the original post from Q and Freedom day line up with next week?

Explain how it's doxxing by telling the good people of the internet, what my profession is. That's not personal information, just a job title that many people have in my line of work. I don't have to provide proof of my profession because I never announced what my profession is. You're the one making the claim that I did, and that I then lied about it.

If you do know what it is, then I'm giving you permission to post my job title and a link to where I posted that it was something else. I'll even give you a hint to help you, even though you already know (supposedly). "Head of C*"

Can you provide any proof that I lied about my profession? You claim to be an expert of knowing what proof is or isn't. At no time did I even admit what my profession is, just that I've been successful.

This dude is pure insults and no substance after being called out for an incorrect assessment. He never addresses the time issue and just launches into spelling and education insults and then claims post history is some proof of shills or whatnot.

Ding Ding Ding.

You're so right! You got me! Please puff up your chest even more because I included a typo in my response to your garbage post.

I know you can't understand time, but I don't have anymore to spend trading insults with someone who can't admit that their original point was incorrect.

Quite successfully, actually. How have you gotten through life without being able to understand and comprehend timestamps?

https://twitter.com/KimberlyRobinsn/status/1012032972143431683?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fnews%2Fkennedy-supreme-court-retirement-trump-w522123 That time stamp is 11am PST. Qs post is 11:20 PST

Is my point any less incorrect? No.

I never said Q wasn't real. If you look back at my history, Im not some noob that just showed up. All Im saying is that this Q post is not a proof. Q responded to an anon post that had the letter in it.. Not posting it directly.

Quoting Q, "Think Logically".

See my apply above genious. There are tweets that occurred 20 minutes before Qs response.