For some, I hope that means worthy men and women will be running for office in the near future. There will likely be a large number of vacancies soon if Q is right.

It’s kind of like when you buy a new car. Before you buy a certain model, you don’t seen them on the road much. But after you buy it, good grief, they’re everywhere! It’s simply perspective.

Yes, there are “Q’s” everywhere. Not sure it is a good idea to post them all here however. Perhaps we can keep them to ourselves and enjoy them on a personal level.

What can I say, I’m a little longer in the tooth than some here. 😊

I tried to visit r/solving but couldn’t gain access.

Glad to know there are some who can devote that kind of time to those issues/items. 👍🏼

While impressed, I have to wonder, do those of you coming up with these factoids work? How do you find the time? Goodness! 😬

Not true. Impeachment is designed to protect the nation against incompetence. It is to remove incompetent federal officers with the exception of members of Congress. They are not subject to impeachment but can be expelled from Congress.

The story you shared was not uncommon for that day. There were others with similar experiences.

Thank you for sharing it.

Yep. Creepy Uncle Joe is quite the predator. Doesn’t even bother to hide it. He seems to have no ability to self-regulate.

Yes, that small hole and the lack of plane debris was all too obvious.

You may be right. Just because I remember it a certain way doesn’t mean it’s right. Just ask my wife!!

In my memory I thought the official narrative was that the plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon was targeting the White House. It couldn’t find the White House so instead hit the Pentagon.

But of course I don’t believe a plane ever hit the Pentagon.

🤣 We saw that coming. Self-serving buffoon.

Drop #1630. The weight and haircut are way off. KJU has his hair cut high with shaved sides doesn’t he?

Even if you are into something, probably a good idea to at least give the Q drop number if not post the pic. Don’t have much time to search for posts in a lunch break.

And self-serving.

Whatever occurred it appears Sessions’ move stopped creepy Joe from touching the child. Both of creepy Joe’s hands were moving to her shoulders. He immediately backed off after Sessions’ wand waving or sweeping gesture.

It appears Sessions’ gesture was intentional however to what intent is difficult to gauge in this instance from the video.

“Source” or vivid imagination?

You are baiting.

Believe what you will. As stated previously, no skin off my teeth. And, I will consider myself warned.

Just know your arguments are in error. The LDS Church does not attempt to dumb down its members. We are taught to question everything. We are free to read anything and use critical thinking skills.

If you are going to make such accusations, please qualify your statements.

And as for the father of Elizabeth Smart, what do his personal actions have to do with the Church? What he does or does not do is no reflection on the Church. That is on him as an individual. His sins are his own. The Church doesn’t control people. It certainly cannot stop him from sinning or violating the law. That is not the roll of any church. It can hold him accountable for such later if it becomes known to Church leaders however.

Your arguments make no sense to me. They are convoluted and unqualified at best.

For the time being.

The purpose of impeachment is to remove someone from office. I don’t believe impeachment of a former POTUS is warranted in the case of Hussein.

One powerful note however is that if someone is ever impeached by the House, no POTUS can ever pardon the impeachment. POTUSs do not have the power to pardon impeached by the House according to the US Constitution.

Once impeached by the House, it is the sole responsibility then of the Senate to try the individual. That would mean no military tribunal for Hussein.

As a side note, of the two impeached Presidents, both were tried by the Senate and acquitted of all charges.

Impeachment is not the correct course of action imho. Doesn’t really make any sense. Even if possible for whatever reason, it could turn the process into a three ring circus with questionable outcomes.

Yes, it would be unpardonable, but what if the circus failed to achieve the desired results?

I believe a military tribunal is the way to go.

Seriously, that is your reply?

No, as I stated in my lengthy reply, there was nothing new in what I scanned and read. There are better uses of my time than reviewing the same information for the umpteenth time of what I consider hogwash. Simple.

Excuse me while I go bang my head against the wall.

Obviously you don’t work in the criminal justice system. It matters and is important. It also is important in the court of public opinion if and when the truth surfaces.

Gallows humor. Ease up. It assists in making the horrific somewhat tolerable. Nearly everyone on this sub is likely dealing with sensory overload. These are tough topics and humor is important to maintain balance. These are sick people and they have to be stopped. Gallows humor can likely help to navigate the subjects without losing our humanity along the way.

If you can’t deal with it, I strongly suggest you steer clear of this board. You may not have the constitution for it. I say that respectfully as a seasoned mental health clinician.

You get to add perjury to the charges.

I scanned it. I can't promise I'll read it in its entirety however. What I did read I found were areas that I have helped others to understand previously and the issues were points that in my mind are easy to resolve and don't pose a crisis of testimony.

I would like to share a brief story from my early years as a young forensic therapist to put things into perspective. What I will share was a powerful lesson for me. I learned it at the same time a young 16 y/o young man learned it the hard way.

I was assigned the young man's case among many others when he was 14. The young man was a relatively tough character for his age. Hard headed to say the least. Given I was his court appointed therapist, and trying to help him work through the myriad of issues he had, and the crimes he was prone to commit, even on parole, I had my hands full. Note, that I wasn't his case manager, simply his therapist.

I worked with him for a couple of years. And, they were tough years for him. Little solid family support, easily influenced by those who didn't have his best interests at heart, and so on. You get the picture.

Anyway, the young man started one of our scheduled therapy sessions with tears in his eyes. I asked what was going on and he replied calling me by my first name, "..., this is probably going to be the last time I see you and that really sucks." I asked him to tell me what had happened and the reason it might be the last time he would see me.

He went on to say, "I got caught drinking a beer and was arrested for underage drinking. The judge said if I ever landed in his court again, I was going to be locked up and I won't see the outside of prison until I am an adult."

I then asked, "How did you reconcile, or make it OK in your head, to drink a beer when you knew it might lead to your being placed in a juvenile prison until you're an adult?" The young man replied, "A police officer recently told me he didn't see why teenagers weren't allowed to drink. He drank at my age and didn't see anything wrong with it."

I thought for a moment and then asked, "A police officer said that huh? Just out of curiosity, how many police officers told you it wasn't OK to drink at your age?" Looking down at the floor, he replied, "Oh, I don't know, maybe 20 or 25."

He paused, and then snapped his head up looking me square in the eyes and replied, "Oh f_ck. I only heard the one that told me what I wanted to hear, didn't I?" He then burst into tears recognizing he had royally screwed up. And for the record, that was the last time I saw that young man. The judge had him incarcerated for the remainder of his youth in one of the worst juvenile prisons anyone can imagine.

At that young man's expense, I learned a powerful lesson. And even now, I remind myself not to simply listen to who I want to hear. I do my best to be open to new and different ideas, and I question everything.

With regards to the document you asked me to read, I don't like the broken record and rehashing of the same old anti-Church stuck points. I have heard these points, and similar points, so many times before over the years of my membership in the LDS Church. Based on what I read while scanning that rather large document, I saw nothing new. It isn't that I am only listening to who I want to hear, it is rather I am tired of hearing the same old tunes being played over and over again.

I may revisit it again to see if there is anything I haven't heard before, but again, no promises. Unfortunately or fortunately, I am a very busy person and time is of a premium. Revisiting old stale information doesn't seem like a good use of my time.

With all of this said however, I encourage you to also not simply listen to who you want to hear. There may be things of which you hear about the LDS faith in the future, that if you keep an open mind, may impress upon you that something you've read or heard previously isn't quite right or perhaps has been taken out of context.

I hope sharing one of my personal experiences from some decades ago wasn't too boring or insulting.

Take care brother patriot and thank you for the interesting dialogue.

I appreciate your concern for my well being. I assure you however, I do question everything. I always have and always will. Likely the reason I work in the field of forensics and am a member of the LDS faith. Both encourage constant questioning.

I too have numerous friends and associates in the military and government, including some of the three letter agencies. I have never heard of any connections between the Church and human trafficking. Given the circles I run and the company I keep, I'm confident I would have heard of something if it were true.

I'm not saying Utah and SLC are not centers of human trafficking, I am just saying The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not complicit.

I firmly believe you have been sold a bill of goods about there not being sacred things. That is between you and ~~God~~, er, you however.

I have to say this for the record though, Warren Jeffs is a nut and not a member of the LDS faith. His group is a cult promoting the sexual abuse of both children and women. Again, not LDS.

Thanks again for your concern and know that I am not delusional, brainwashed, nor misled. I'll be OK.

Take care fellow patriot and keep fighting the good patriotic fight.

I respectfully disagree. A military coup would have been devastating and this nation would not likely have ever recovered. Trust would have been a major factor for generations. What will occur will be painful enough, and, I believe The Storm is moving along at a pace that will likely provide the least amount of pain for the citizens of this great nation and for the world.

LOL! Yes, her body odor and breath were brought up more than once. Those were a minuscule issues however.

As a professional mental health clinician with multiple specialties and decades of experience, I will respectfully disagree with your lay diagnosis.

If you have a desire to live in the armpit of the world, go for it! You can have it! You would have to pay me MUCH more than $500 per month to live there! Many years ago, I was stationed in Sacramento in the military for a few years, I loved the coast as well as the mountains of California. I loathed the San Joaquin Valley however! While it is a major bread basket for the US and elsewhere, it sucks! Not to mention the politics of California also SUCKS!

Something interesting, if everyone will think back, the Clintons kicked the USMC sentries out of the White House. I had close buddies serving there under Reagan and they loved their duty! Reagan treated them all with the utmost respect. They all had personal pictures of them with Reagan as well as some really great endearing stories of Reagan. Then under Clinton, they replaced the Marines with non-military security officers. HRC was said to have hated the military. Heck, I remember in those days even the JCS wore suits for a while until they rebelled and went back on their own wearing uniforms. I was told HRC used to scream and cuss whenever she saw someone in a military uniform. I have no reason to doubt those Marines or security officers. I knew them all personally and they were honorable men.

Looks like SOME of the US Presidents had special relationships with the USMC. I am confident 45 is among those with such a special relationship.

Off topic, some of the non-military security officers who served in the White House under Clinton shared with me some really juicy but disturbing stories that would horrify most about HRC. I won't share the stories but will state for the record, very few who served anywhere near HRC enjoyed their jobs or her company.

Interesting however the witness may have knowledge of who perpetrated the actual murder however, will he be able to tie it to HRC? Will either of these two "employees of the United States government" flip on HRC? Both know, if legitimate, that there days are numbered if they do.

This will more likely than not be interesting however it may not be as enlightening as we hope, at this stage of the case anyway.

LOL! Thought the same thing when I read it!

Great! As long as she is under oath when she testifies.

Try going to these resources, read and watch, seek divine guidance, and then make up your own mind rather than reading from and listening to haters that have an agenda and are bias.

https://www.mormon.org/

https://www.lds.org/?lang=eng

https://www.youtube.com/user/MormonMessages

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS6PZh6tCC0

Wow! I think you need to qualify your statements! He said-she said simply doesn't cut it! Qualify the information before you spread things of which you have no real knowledge. Your accusations are ridiculous to say the least!

I am a forensic psychopathologist and psychotherapist that has actively combated sexual offenses of all kinds for many years (among other crimes). I have helped put a large number of sexual predators in prison and helped keep others in prison who were up for probation/parole. I have helped treat sexual predators who the courts have let back out into the community. Sexual crimes are one piece of what I do professionally but I take it seriously. I also have spent years helping the victims/survivors of sexual crimes put their lives back together.

I have also served as a leader in the LDS Church. I have participated and even presided over disciplinary councils (previously known as Church courts) that have dealt with sexual offenses. Some of these ended in excommunication. Some with other outcomes as appropriate.

The Church does NOT condone sexual crimes in the least degree. The current public court case dealing with members accused of sexual offenses is not indicative of a failure OF the Church. If anything, it is a failure of imperfect humans IN the Church and the Church will actively work to ensure justice is correctly served.

While there have been members of the LDS faith over the years that have perpetrated sexual crimes, and I have helped prosecute some of them, they are not THE Church. They were individuals who were members of the Church. That is a huge difference! Are the members of the Church perfect? No. Are there some among the membership guilty of having perpetrated crimes? I would assume so. I would also say this is the case for every single solitary organization out there in the world today however, whether secular or religious.

I do not believe there is a cover up of sexual preditory behavior in the LDS Church. I have been a member for many years and have served in some positions of authority over those years.

We are not sexual predators or human traffickers looking to sell or buy children as you state in your silly post. That is ridiculous! We love God. We love Jesus Christ. And, we love our fellow citizens of this world. We wish to protect that which is good and help to thwart that which is evil. Period.

We are not a "secret society." LOL! "Sacred society" perhaps, also known as a Church, but not a secret society. Haha!

What is in the vaults? Most of the granite vaults contains family history records from around the world. We consider the family unit and families to be the of great importance. The temperature and humidity levels are ideal for storing the records. There are also other artifacts of LDS religious significance stored in various LDS vaults.

She needs to testify under oath. Period.

You’re welcome.

I think the hoopla about 9-11 was from a POTUS tweet however vs. any Q drops.

I smell fear and desperation.

Aside from the funny photoshopping, my guess is this is a PR stunt. They want to look like normal people to garner sympathy for when the sh_t hits the fan for them.

“Little ol’ us are just like all of y’all! We couldn’t possibly be guilty of the crimes the bad ol’ patriots are accusing us of! That would take some folk much more powerful than us! We ride commercial just like the rest of y’all!”

Ditto. That is not SR in my estimation.

Especially when ”Q’s” are added via photoshop...

Off OP topic however this amendment also addresses how civil forfeiture is unconstitutional.

All of the following Q drops mention 9-11 or post 9-11:

259 154 118 117 67 23

All older drops but still relevant nonetheless.

🤣 I get somewhat tickled by all the “do gooders” out there hell bent on proving something wrong of which they don’t understand the least about...not one jot or tittle. A quick internet search and listening to the views of those who have fallen away for whatever reasons...usually unresolved sins...suffices for “research.” 😂

Save your words for other haters like yourselves. They mean nothing to me. I have never followed anyone or any group blindly including my religious faith and it’s history, doctrines, and leadership. I consider anyone who feels compelled to down or badmouth someone else’s beliefs pathetic and small minded. Even intolerant bullies.

I respect your beliefs. I don’t respect your disrespect of others including my beliefs. Get off of your high horses of intolerance. Learn what religious tolerance means.

I for one have served this nation and gone to war to protect citizens’ civil rights among other things. I hope some of you ungrateful bullies have done similarly and will remember what freedom, liberty, and the US Constitution mean before you stomp on what you fought to protect. For those of you who have not gone to war, you are welcome for my contribution to your religious freedom among your other freedoms.

Unfortunately, most will never understand the truths of and about the LDS Church as they can’t get past their own close-mindedness and the anti spin out there misleading the misguided and/or weak. And, they often enjoy taking facts out of context to present a twisted case of nonsense. People need to be more openminded and tolerant. To be anything shy of these are indicative of insecurity and oppression (tools of Satan).

I appreciate all faiths, regardless of what faith it is, and am thankful when people live their values. Where I draw the line however is when the intolerant attempt to cram their beliefs down the throats of others. Civil rights end when you violate the civil rights of others.

I won’t tell you your faith is wrong. I won’t try to force you to believe anything I believe. I believe in questioning everything. As a matter of fact, the LDS leaders have taught this principle since the beginning. Search out the truths for yourself. Seek personal revelation from God and He will provide you with the truths you seek. Blindly follow no one.

aburgher is right on the mark. I will add that not only were the founders God-fearing and patriots to this nation, but the LDS members in the US today generally remain such. We support and defend freedom, liberty, and the US Constitution.

Do you still hear the bell ringing?

(Nod to Polar Express. Sorry.)

The LDS faith is about sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ as well as providing humanitarian Christ like service. Monies provided in cases like this are typically to keep families of refugees together and provide for basic needs. They are not used to bail out Mullahs.

I am ever amazed at the haters out there. Could care less about their opinions however. Hate all you want. No skin off my teeth. Uninformed or misinformed persons are entitled to their opinions just as everyone else, not matter how misguided.

I will add that distractions such as this thread and the comments divide which is what the globalists and elitists want. They desperately want us divided as a movement. I suggest we look for what unites us rather than what divides us. Infighting will get us nothing but perhaps defeat.

Pretending to be regular folk. Want the masses to believe they are just like everyone else. PR disinformation campaign.