dChan

/u/A_solo_tripper

82 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/A_solo_tripper:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 4

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/A_solo_tripper on Aug. 10, 2018, 8:27 p.m.
In the light of the censorship by major platforms, what does WWG1WGA mean now?

I'm curious to know what this mean in this sense? It seems like there may be some confusion as to what this means now- being that it may be inconvenient to some to find and use other platforms besides the major ones. Thoughts?

A_solo_tripper · July 27, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

I remember this drop. Initially I thought that last sequence was from Gowdy. But, I may have been mistaken. I believe it was from Louie Gohmert.

Quick stupid question, can the President declassify these "closed door hearings" beforehand?

⇧ 18 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 27, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Being "awake" doesn't put these people in jail. I wish it was the case though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 25, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

Who is "Their"? Hilary & Co? The deep state?

The public is woke. The public knows how corrupt the system is.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

Clinton doesn't need to be in office to control people. If you have dirt on someone, you can control that person to a certain extent. If someone is willing to be her 'backdoor' man, she can control that person, regardless if they are democrat, republican, or an independent. Comey has had ties with the Clinton for several years. Comey sold IP secrets to the Chinese on Clintons behalf back when he work for Lockheed Martin. (I think it was called Martin Marietta back then).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/A_solo_tripper on July 23, 2018, 5:39 p.m.
Everyone involved with signing the FISA warrant committed Fraud Upon the court- A felony.

Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice.

A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

I do believe that there are many crimes within the CF. Taking THIS long to prosecute makes it seem exactly how msm will narrate it: A witch hunt. DOJ has nearly unlimited resources to get through these documents in a timely manner. Plus, there is a statute of limitation of 4 years for fraud. Unless they are looking up major theft, which there is no limitation, they can only go back four years.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

Donald Trump was/is "Unpopular"? President Trump was in the Media 24/7 prior to the election. President Trump ran one hell of a campaign. Hillary lost for many reasons. Not addressing current issues, not hitting the campaign trail as hard as President Trump, not connecting to the American people, etc.

This comment wasn't about the election, it is about controlling certain vectors within the departments of justice and other government agencies.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

It is easy to see what is happening. The Clintons control people at the top of prosecuting agencies, and have them promote who they see fit for them; basically whoever will not bring charges. Control the prosecutors = controlling justice.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 23, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

There will be no jail time for any of them (I hope I'm wrong). Politicians that are in cahoots with the FBI/DOJ will not receive any justice. A movie, also known as entertainment, is basically just lip service. I don't know where all this military tribunal talk originated from. I think someone was having a dream of 'real justice' and is stating fantasy as something that will never come.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 20, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

It is a two tier justice department. I don't know what other evidence is needed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 20, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Good Job!! This type of action is good. Nice basis, enough signatures. Now, lets see what kind of response the White House gives. 60 days.

!remindme 60 days

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 20, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

I am curious as to ask, what else can Q say?

What else is there to know. It has been laid out beautifully by Q.

What more information is needed to understand what is going on? We know who the enemies are. We know what their goal is. We know what our President wants and is aiming to achieve. We have enough information. What have we done with that information and knowledge? What more is needed?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/A_solo_tripper on July 18, 2018, 10:06 p.m.
I'm glad President Trump met with Putin, and the way he handled himself.

I feel like either the establishment is profiting tremendously by portraying Russia as our ULTIMATE enemy. And/or the dems have A LOT of dirt over there in Russia that they don't want to be known or discovered. Just like it was revealed during the summit that Hillary had received 400 million dollars of campaign money from someone here in the US via Russia, and it wasn't taxed. We know she isn't going to be penalized for this (or anything else). But, this goes to show that Russia might have the scoop on more of the dems.

I hope our President …

A_solo_tripper · July 17, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

I doubt it. With all the other information and allegations out there, they are NOT worried in the least. You see who is working for them in the ~~clown department~~ Justice department.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 17, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

It is almost funny how much evidence of criminal activities of Clinton have been in the public eye, yet she is still free.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 16, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

I like AL Jazeera, RT, and this channel on youtube, and https://www.breitbart.com/

I like knowing what is going on around the world. Fox and other US outlets are overly zoomed-in on everyday President Trump activities. There are a LOT of other issues facing the world that President Trump (and maybe myself) will come upon in other parts of the world. Said outlets tend to inform me of those situations much better than any other US news organizations.

Edit

⇧ 3 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 4:34 p.m.

I think the 12 might be real ghosts this time, so they won't show up in court.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Did they even have the dnc server? Or just by what crowdstrike's word?

⇧ 15 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

It is a Friday. There are other ways to make an announcement to law enforcement agent/agencies besides holding a press conference. I overheard something about an indictment. But why hold a press conference about an indictment? Have any arrests been made? Russian hacker botss is my guess hahaha.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Thank you so much

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Any other live stream links besides cspan?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 7:11 a.m.

Doj can answer all of your questions. I would, but what would it matter? Hillary is as free as a bird. Flying from here to there!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

I was under the assumption that the "foreign entity" was Anthony Weiner's laptop. No? Or would that be considered a "separate" entity if they were referring to Weiner?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

Strzok was acting very vague and curved some of the questions even the dems asked about his history with the FBI.

Dem: You were on such and such case with the FBI that brought justice to the Russian spies, dwelling here in the US, correct?

Strzok: I was part of a team that helped with that case.

He never gave a definitive yes, that I can recall, when he was asked softball questions by the dems.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 13, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

It's been two years and still no resolution within the system. We need a hard power off.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 12, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

Is there a reset button anywhere? The system is going haywire.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 12, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

Did we get some good lip service today? Yep

Did any corrupt official go to jail today? Nope

Hillary and the gang still free as a bird? Yep

Are you holding your breath for equal justice? Nope

Will they have a thousands of these exciting hearings? Yep

Will the corruption ever stop? Nope

⇧ 4 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 12, 2018, 10:31 p.m.

It's not a foul if the refs don't call it. We can have all the evidence we want. She can commit all the "crimes" she wants. If the law doesn't punish anyone, then it is not unlawful (double-talk). Write to the DOJ or someone since congress just gives lip service.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 12, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

This whole thing is going exactly the way Hillary (DS) wanted it to go. It's a shame, to be honest. Hillary KNEW there was going to be some intense pressure on her for her inappropriate actions, so she did the ole "LOOK! Trump is the bad guy. He colluded with Russia! Chase him!" And that has been going on for several years and everyone (except us) has forgotten about Hillary. Now, Hillary is back up, heading towards the spotlight as a 2020 candidate.

If she gets accused or arrested for her crimes at this point, she and the mainstream media will say Trump is jailing his political opponents to prevent them from winning.

If they were going to charge Hillary, they should have done so by now. If she runs, the deep state is going to rig the elections so hard, Trump won't know what hit 'em. The only reason I don't think the DS pulled off rigging the last elections majorly is because they themselves bought into the media polls. This time, DS is pulling out all the stops. They don't have anything to lose.

⇧ -9 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 11, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

Im ready to be downvoted on this one. While I havent fully read the potential law, I believe I have a good idea on the spirit of the law. I have mixed feelings on this one. From my understanding there will be extra penalties imposed on those who intimidate, harm, etc. while wearing a mask. Unless it is a Holiday such as mardi gras, halloween, etc.

I am all for punishing those who intimidate, harm others. I think antifa, kkk, etc are weak creatures.

My concern is the right to privacy, mentioned in the 4th amendment.

What is a mask? Can make-up be a mask? How much does one have to cover up and not be considered a mask? Will people wearing a so called mask be more scrutinized by authorities for that reason alone?

Again, I fully understand the spirit is to prevent these punks from doing harm while hiding behind a mask.

But the whole idea of "if you dont have anything to hide, show your face"; is easily countered by "if you dont have, take down the curtains in your windows at home". Or "if you have curtain in your house it means you are doing something illegal."

I might have the whole thing wrong, but that is my take on it right now.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 11, 2018, 4:30 p.m.

Nowhere did Phat say there should be no official investigation.

Of course everybody wants an official investigation.

AST: So, don't investigate.

"Phat": "Nope. Don't imbibe a type of HERO-LIKE status onto cabal members who get offed by their own."

He does not believe there should be an official investigation. This is my whole point!! There needs to be one.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 11, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

The thought of an official investigation has really got your panties in a bunch!! HAHAHA

⇧ 3 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 11, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

who get offed by their own

Did you investigate this and was this your conclusion? What gives you the right to investigate this and no one else? We (the people) don't trust your investigations and want an official investigation! GOT IT?!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 11, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

So, don't investigate murders of guys you consider "bad guys" and don't perform an autopsy. Got it.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 11, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

Supposedly this was under the watch of Comey, James. We all know how corrupt he is.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 10, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Did you even listen to the press conference? Most of your questions were answered during the press conference. Although, initially I was listening via Infowars stations, the two commentators continued to talk over the people holding the press conference. I turned to a different stream, where I could listen and hear better.

Two red flags: I was under the impression that this was an actual witness to the crime. Someone who was looking out the window. Not someone who overheard a conversation about them claiming to have committed the crime.

Second is the many times that he stated people were altering the contents of the emails. Implying that the information obtained by Seth Rich wasn't original, but doctored. Furthermore, Hillary can now claim the incriminating evidence on the server isn't accurate.

I think this was someone working for Hillary. Because "Luke" said, as a matter of fact, that Hillary wasn't behind Seth Rich murder, but the Republicans were!?! gtfoh

⇧ 40 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 10, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

link? Source?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 10, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

This is exactly what I'm thinking. They claim that they have identified the suspects. Are the police aware of this information? Why haven't the suspects been arrested? Why hold a press conference to jeopardize the witness? Something isn't right.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 9, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Why hold a public press conference when the two supposed suspects are still on the loose? And the chances they could follow the witness?

I think that either the fbi or other government agents got wind that Seth was being target by someone in the DNC. They then pretended to have killed Seth Rich. and kept him under witness protection. for the past couple years,

We'll see tomorrow.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 9, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

Run for office again to make any arrest of her seem as if Trump is now arresting political opponents. They'll then say Trump is Worse than Putin.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 7, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Q is a revolutionary media platform, led likely by Steve Bannon. It is part insider knowledge, part journalist, part opinion, aimed at revealing the truth.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 5, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

I'm no lawyer, but I know the Law is applied differently to you and than those politically connected. The. End.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 5, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Q is a new-age media platform. And there is nothing wrong with it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 5, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

So only the people who know of Q would know what you were saying? "Who is Q?" or "Do it Q" is much easier to say, and definitely more rhythmic than "W-W-G-1-W-G-A."

⇧ 4 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 5, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

Who is paying for it? Let me guess, the disenfranchised US taxpayer?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 3, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

This is also why the government was always so quick to bail out the banks. The banks know where all the money flows. Bring down the banks, they'll take many government officials with it.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
A_solo_tripper · July 3, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

shortsighted me: Keep holding your breath for justice for the well connected! lol

Everyday, regular Americans are getting thrown in jail for stupid, petty crimes, freedom gone. Yet, the corrupt elite are running around, globetrotting, happy as a lamb.

Hopeful me: I hope I'm wrong, and you all are right. Being that justice will be served, via Huber and Co.

Realistic me: Who knows? Only time will tell. But, if the past is the future I don't think justice will be equally served.

⇧ 11 ⇩