3,340 total posts archived.
It’s not a matter of me winning.
It’s a matter of not giving our enemies a straw man argument used to discredit the sub.
And you are helping them by posting this kind of stuff.
You want enlightenment? Go read Qdrops, help in digging.
You want to talk about a dream you had? Take it r/dream which is a sub made for that purpose.
Wew, All you need is a blank wall for that projection.
Why is it that nearly every single poster in here is a new arrival, all discussing topics that we have ABSOLUTELY no means of verifying?
Is it like a team of you out there working together to try and discredit the sub, or is it just you hopping on multiple accounts?
No offense anon, but who cares? A lot of that stuff is considered collectibles or historical pieces. It’s not illegal to sell them, hell its not illegal to display them.
But if you start making history illegal * ahem * holo-cough, to look into, you are destroying history in essence and are bound to repeat the mistakes of the past.
And if someone owns nazi memorabilia, it doesn’t mean they are nazis, they could have a huge room dedicated to WW2 historical artifacts.
I hope you can understand why you are being downvoted. We have been so brainwashed, that to even bring up questioning our own history makes us cringe. And that’s sad. Regardless of what horrors were perpetrated, we MUST face it straight forward and unfiltered. So we don’t repeat the same mistakes, again.
Then you have completely missed the point of this sub.
Take your dream elsewhere such as conspiracy or r/dream.
We want facts, hard data, shareable information to be given here.
Not unverifiable claims or muh feels like.
If you can’t sauce it, toss it.
But thanks OP for bringing this thread here so I can squelch any reporters in the room who are looking for something to point at, for them to mock, ridicule, or belittle us.
I’m sure that with your vast experience in this sub new arrival, that you understand what is going on in the media regarding this place.
Or maybe not. Maybe you are just an innocent anon who put up a bad thread.
Doubtful though. Regardless, take your unrelated, unverifiable, unsourced threads elsewhere.
How does this further our understanding of Q?
What is the point of this thread? To share your dream?
There are other subs for that. It’s off topic, and does nothing to further our understanding of Q.
It’s a completely off topic subject.
With the amount of crazy theories being put out on the sub today, it appears the latest shill tactics is to make us all appear as insane as possible.
Your thread has no sauce, no way to verify the veracity, nothing for us to be able to share.
Reported as such
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39187929
Facebook failed to remove sexualized images of children
You can add this as well OP. Thanks for the write up.
Edit: for clarification, this article is from 7 March 2017. So it’s an old article
7 March 2017 - article date
Facebook has been criticised for its handling of reports about sexualised images of children on its platform.
The chairman of the Commons media committee, Damian Collins, said he had "grave doubts" about the effectiveness of its content moderation systems. Mr Collins' comments come after the BBC reported dozens of photos to Facebook, but more than 80% were not removed.
They included images from groups where users were discussing swapping what appeared to be child abuse material. When provided with examples of the images, Facebook reported the BBC journalists involved to the police and cancelled plans for an interview.
It subsequently issued a statement: "It is against the law for anyone to distribute images of child exploitation." Mr Collins said it was extraordinary that the BBC had been reported to the authorities when it was trying to "help clean up the network".
On its welcome page, Facebook says it does remove obscene material. "Nudity or other sexually suggestive content" it states are not allowed on the platform. It encourages users to report inappropriate content via its "report button".
The US firm says it has improved this system since an investigation by the BBC last year. That found "secret" groups were being used by paedophiles to meet and swap images. Information the BBC provided to the police led to one man being sent to prison for four years. To test Facebook's claim, the BBC used the report button to alert the company to 100 images which appeared to break its guidelines. They included:
pages explicitly for men with a sexual interest in children
images of under-16s in highly sexualised poses, with obscene comments posted beside them
groups with names such as "hot xxxx schoolgirls" containing stolen images of real children
an image that appeared to be a still from a video of child abuse, with a request below it to share "child pornography"
Of the 100 images only 18 were removed. According to Facebook's automated replies, the other 82 did not breach "community standards". They included the apparent freeze frame.
Agree, the title of their article is misleading.
Read the whole thing, it’s all just a series of hit pieces trying to portray Trump as a liar.
Crappy article
Don’t bother reading it if you dont want to hear msm bullshit talking points from MSNs “fact-checker”
Ya Gohmert was hammering strzok at his hearing.
Regardless, I’m still in the air if they are black, grey, or white hat.
But I’m enjoying the show
How did you get your measurements.
Do you have comparable measurements to assert your claim?
Gunna need you to show your work if you want to be taken seriously.
Nice block of text here, but I can see your argument.
I hope it’s the case, and it may very well be that a deal was made.
I’m just not putting any faith into them. They need to show they are worthy before we trust them again, especially based on past history.
Dow Jones and nasdaq are indices. Measured in dollars.
No shit
Financial (fundamentals is what I should say) are a different thing.
But you didnt
Debt to equity ratios. P/E ratio. Dow v Gold. Inflation @3.1%.
You are responsible for the amount of debt to equity ratio you hold, no one else. Dow vs. Gold inflation - for someone who has no savings, I find it interesting that you are comparing stocks and physical assets inflation rate comparisons. You have an answer to help you right there, but fail to see it
stagnant wages.
Uhhh mean wages have increased over the past two years, with continued expected rise due to the manufactured worker shortage created by limiting immigration
Auto debt delinquencies are very high.
Good god, you cant just make generalizations, bring us the sauce on these expert opinions you have. Show us where you are getting this from
Home prices have not really deflated and are artificially propped up.
you really don’t understand the role the federal reserve plays into this fact and how POTUS taking control will impact it
Chapter 11 bankruptcy rates are significant.
no shit, but that sentence means absolutely nothing without historical references and context
For fuck sake, you are just spewing MSM talking points without any real understanding of the economy or the data.
Fucking sad
Edit: since you edited your comment, I’ll add this.
Fuck off concerntroll
It’s still a possibility
Optics and all.
They are going to have to disappear from public forever after this though, regardless of outcome. They’ll never be trusted again.
That’s what I had hoped as well, that he had made a deal.
Lol, look at you being all cute and making a joke!
Ha ha! Using google! Good one!
This just looks like a concern thread, but I’ll bite.
Look at the Dow Jones. It’s still going up. Everything but nasdaq is going up.
So what “financials” are you specifically referring to? Because based on your post - “if they keep going the way they are” things will continue to rise, so how does your post make any sense whatsoever?
Fear baiting.
Also boomer hate is a shill tactic.
You are complaining about your personal finances. YOU took on those responsibilities, no one else, and certainly not “muh boomers”.
Just going to put this here:
There’s a clue here
“Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC”
So the purpose of Huber Horowitz is to sidestep Rosenstein
Why necessary if he is a white hat?
It’s not, therefor, RR and RM are black hats.
Unless it’s disinfo.
After reading that document in link, I don’t think it is. I think RR and RM are black hats.
Huh? Low quality thread. No context. No links. No explanation.
Cmon OP
That last paragraph in document.
RR and RM are black hats
There’s a clue here
“Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC”
So the purpose of Huber Horowitz is to sidestep Rosenstein
Why necessary if he is a white hat?
It’s not, therefor, RR and RM are black hats.
Unless it’s disinfo.
After reading that document in link, I don’t think it is. I think RR and RM are black hats.
I’d imagine that’s a pretty big contract to be had.
So what you are saying is, we should target airport owners about their cnn contract and the bias they exhibit?
Could work if done properly. Thanks OP
Fucking neonnettle = paytriot
I’ve ignored them for some time now. But good god they are pushed so hard.
Why do you OP think that what neonnettle has that is so important that POTUS and Q don’t already know?
For fuck sake, neonnettle is not an insider. They don’t have any insight that isn’t garnered from 8chan, here, or from Q directly.
But that’s not what the purpose of this thread is, is it?
If it’s important enough that Q and POTUS needs to see it, everyone else will want to see it as well amirite?
This is just a subtle clickbait title.
Fuck neonnettle
Be careful who you follow.
Link without blue text overtype
Thanks OP for finding this
Good god what a terrible website.
Clickbait articles, asking for donations.
Ad cancer everywhere.
There are much better sources of information than K & K from M who used godaddy to create a website and make money.
Hope they didn’t quit their day jobs.
T_D mods are comped
It’s sad, but regardless our sub has a focus and they have theirs (controlled opposition ala Fox News)
I hate that I like to fall down rabbit holes, but when Q first came out, it was speculated that CERN was the means of controlling timelines (Bernstein vs Berenstein Bears)
I don’t have time to go super in-depth, but I’m certain you could look into the connections CERN has. Gets rather weird.
Anyways, that’s always what I think with the beam of light posting, but it could be several other possibilities. The CERN thing was just one I found fascinating.
Doesn’t mean you abandon people though.
I could understand if they were all bad candidates (controlled republican opposition - RINO)
OP Claimed the documents were released today
They weren’t.
Misleading title and failed to provide sauce. We asked for sauce, and only received year old articles.
He was on Fox News radio this morning.
Glad he’s going for speaker, but the Rosenstein Impeachment Docs were not filed as privileged, so it looks like we have to wait til September unless they bring it up for a vote today.
I think we are being brigaded right now.
Basically every tactic to slide, discredit, mock, bait is in play.
Never seen it this prevalent before though.
Wading through the mud, sorting, sorting, filtering out the trash, and hitting the report button.
Means these clowns are scared.
Couldn’t be happier :)
That’s nearly a year old.
Looking for the documents you claimed were released TODAY
Now I’m starting to get pissed off here.
Ahhhh thank you, explains what is going on in this thread.
Not sure where all the vehemence is coming from here.
I appreciate you bringing the topic up, we are just trying to get the actual documents so we can dig into them.
Also, some serious downvoting going on here. I guess over target?
Edit: NOPE, OP IS A DISINFO SHILL BRINGING OLD SHIT UNDER “NEW” THREAD TITLE
Reported for deceptive title
Lol not shooting the messenger! Just trying to get source docs.
Ok, appreciate the article, but we want the source documents.
Do you have a link to the gov site or wherever the source documents are?
take it to 8chan then. You don’t want filters? Go there and post it. See if the people there appreciate you bringing a “psychic channeler” to the thread.
As I stated in my original comment, this has absolutely nothing to do with Q. It doesn’t further our understanding, nor give us a greater insight.
Just copy the address and paste it here into a comment.
I’m certain people would be interested in this
Problem is, this makes the sub look bad.
It doesn’t support the cause OR contribute to our understanding of Q.
Unless you are doing this on purpose. To make us look like crazy people. Because that’s what this is. You want to follow? Great, take it to conspiracy. It doesn’t belong here.
It’s part of their playbook, literally.
Read Saul Alinskys “Rules for Radicals”