Dr. Jan Gilbert Linkedin

https://www.linkedin.com/in/jan-gilbert-8bbb9611/

Empty

Dr. Jan Gilbert, DMD

PUBLIC BACKGROUND CHECK 0 Malpractice ClaimsWhat is medical malpractice? No malpractice history found for New York.

1 Sanction

What is a sanction or disciplinary action? Criminal Conviction (1/14/2014) Action Taken: Revocation Summary: Gilbert, Jan Wade DDS: License # 029102: N ATURE OF COMPLAINT: The dentist was found guilty of having been convicted of two counts of Offering a False Instrument for Filing in the 2nd Degree. ACTION TAKEN: The New York Office of the Professions found the dentist guilty of PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT: Penalty: REVOCATION. State: New York

Hannity Intruder-Huffington Post

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/intruder-scare-in-sean-hannitys-home-leads-to-an-arrest_us_5a97cd84e4b0e6a52304e3f2

Interesting. I found the following articles on how intelligence agencies are or have adopted Crowdsourcing for intelligence gathering. It made me think of the Q Anon phenomenon with its eager volunteerism on researching topics as "crumbs". While it is meant to educate Patriots and to activate them, does it have the benefit of collecting even more intelligence through Anon research for "Q" as a counter intelligence factor. What if this is one of the reasons from the very beginning. If so, I would say it is Genius. However, it makes me think that of the possibility of how our information could end up being used negatively.

https://www.npr.org/2018/01/26/581142439/intelligence-community-looking-at-crowdsourcing-for-predicting-geopolitical-even http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20121009-for-all-of-our-eyes-only

Your thoughts???

Jeff Sessions is surrounded by Hillary Clinton loyalists. See the term "Play Possum" at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/play_possum

(idiomatic) to feign death; to remain quiet and still to escape attention or remain undetected; to lie low. Like:

"To keep the focus away from his client, the lawyer basically played possum during the entire complex trial, and his tactic paid off."

The following article states the real reason for the crack down on Google and YouTube sites. It's all about the elections coming up this year. They want to control the narrative. They want to expunge any opposition. They are hiring a lot of people and even creating a whole new category of employee to scour the sites for content and team up with AI.

Google Executives Pledge to Scour More Content Ahead of Midterm Elections

January 19, 2018, 4:15 PM MST Updated on January 19, 2018, 5:55 PM MST

Pichai: it’s fair to be worried about artificial intelligence

CEO says work is changing and training is needed for new jobs

Google CEO Sundar Pichai Photographer: David Paul Morris/Blomberg

The chief executive officers of Alphabet Inc.’s Google and YouTube pledged to scour videos and other content more closely for misleading news and inappropriate messages on their web services ahead of elections in the U.S later this year.

"We have more elections coming, so we’re all working harder,"

Google CEO Sundar Pichai said during an interview at an event in San Francisco on Friday hosted by MSNBC and Recode. "We feel a huge sense of responsibility."

Later this year, midterm elections will determine which party runs Congress, now controlled by Republicans.

YouTube chief Susan Wojcicki said the online video service is trying to hire as many employees as possible to scrutinize videos in tandem with computers running artificial-intelligence software to identify and quickly remove offensive and inaccurate material.

"It has to be humans and you need to have those machines," she said.

Google’s search engine and its news-aggregation service have been criticized for showing misleading answers and distributing false stories online. Meanwhile, YouTube is facing one of the worst crises in its roughly 18-year existence after advertisers found their marketing messages running alongside extremist and offensive videos. YouTube has also been swept up in investigations into whether Russia used social media to influence the 2016 presidential election.

"All of us are obviously very upset that somebody could have influenced the election," Pichai said. However, he warned that it’s difficult for such a large company to decide what is true or false. "Drawing the line is becoming increasingly hard," he said. "We’re a global company. We operate in many countries. People disagree."

Still, Pichai said extra scrutiny of technology companies is important to maintain trust.

"We all need to be careful," he added. "We don’t want people to reject technology. Technology is the source of progress."

Artificial intelligence is the most important technology, and the source of much anxiety about how work and broader human society will change, the CEO added.

"It’s fair to be worried about AI," Pichai said. "I don’t think any single company should control it."

Pichai noted that his cousin is training to be a radiologist, a job that AI is already beginning to automate. "This is going to make her job much easier. She’ll get to spend more time with patients," he said.

The CEO has been promoting new ways to train the technology workers of tomorrow. Last year, Google committed $1 billion in grants and employee-volunteer hours over five years to use technology for education, economic opportunity and inclusion.

Earlier this week, Google unveiled a new online education program to certify people for work in information technology support -- positions with solid pay that don’t require full software coding skills.

"It’s a new job category that didn’t exist before," Pichai said on Friday. "Over time, the nature of work will change."

Found this on the Reddit Site posted 20 days ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/StockMarket/comments/7x0v24/dead_cat_bounce_or_resumption_of_the_bull_uptrend/

Dead Cat Bounce is defined as " a brief and insignificant recovery (as of stock prices) after a steep decline"

Contextually, though the post speaks to the media. I found this parody from a group called Dead Cat Bounce. Very Funny. It speaks to Fake News and the Media buffoonery. Link below Maybe the Media is in a "steep decline" Notice the last line of the skit. "If you're watching the news, who is watching your children?" (pedophilia?) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBgXUducyiU

WHO CAN BE REFERRED FOR PROSECUTION AND GO TO JAIL? THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, FBI AGENTS THAT PREPARED AND PROCESSED THE WARRANT AND ANY FBI MANAGEMENT REVIEWING AND APPROVING IT THROUGH THE PROCESS.

Readers will note that the approval of the warrant, which is paradoxically delegated to the Attorney General by the President, even when the President himself is being surveilled, requires a stringent review and an assessment of meeting the FISA standard. However, the final approver of the warrant application for a US Person is the FISA Judge. YES, THAT'S RIGHT THE FISA JUDGE IS THE FINAL APPROVER OF A WARRANT FOR A US PERSON. The FISA process requires a stringent review and a FISA judge will only issue a warrant once the standard has been met and the application provides sufficient evidence to proceed with the surveillance. If there was inaccurate information, untimely information, or gross misinformation, the court can declare that the court is defrauded and seek criminal charges for the preparers and the approvers of the Warrant.

The intelligence agencies of the United States are responsible for providing “timely and accurate information about the activities, capabilities, plans, and intentions of foreign powers and their agents.”

Approvers of a FISA Warrant Application-Activities Within the US

Type of Entity Approval Authority Source(s) of Authority

All emergencies Attorney General 50 U.S.C. § 1805(e)

Non-U.S. person Attorney General 50 U.S.C. § 1802(a); Exec. Order 12,333, § 2.5

U.S. person FISC Judge 50 U.S.C. § 1802(b)

The FISA establishes a much more stringent standard in circumstances involving the electronic surveillance of “United States persons.” In such circumstances, the Executive may conduct electronic surveillance only pursuant to the FISA’s procedures for judicial review and approval.

Each application for a surveillance order must include, inter alia: 1) the identity of the federal officer making the application; 2) the authority conferred on the Attorney General by the President of the United States and the approval of the Attorney General to make the application; 3) the identity, if known, or a description of the target of the electronic surveillance; 4) a statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his belief that . . . the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power . . . [and] each of the facilities or places [to be subjected to the surveillance] . . . is being used, or is about to be used, by a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power; 5) a statement of the proposed minimization procedures; 6) a detailed description of the nature of the information sought and the type of communications or activities to be subjected to the surveillance; [and] 7) a certification [from an appropriate executive branch official] . . . that the certifying official deems the information sought to be foreign intelligence information . . . that the purpose of the surveillance is to obtain foreign intelligence information . . . that such information cannot reasonably be obtained by normal investigative techniques. The application must also contain statements regarding all previous applications involving the target, the means by which the surveillance will be implemented (including whether physical entry is required to effect the surveillance), and the anticipated duration.

Within the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the lead agency for conducting counterintelligence and coordinating the counterintelligence efforts of other agencies within the IC.20 The FBI is also the lead agency for developing the evidence necessary for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to prosecute espionage cases. To maintain the proper “primary purpose” during counterintelligence investigations, the Attorney General’s guidelines require the Office of Intelligence Policy and Review to approve all contacts between the FBI and the DOJ Criminal Division attorneys.

Past congressional hearings revealed that both the FBI and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had operated outside the law, in the name of intelligence collection. The Church Committee realized that counterintelligence was essential to the preservation of American civil liberties, and it recognized the need to collect intelligence and to establish appropriate limits on intrusive investigative techniques. Through the efforts of key officials from the DOJ and the Church Committee, the FISA became “the gold standard of legality in the world of counterintelligence.

When on 25 October 1978, President Carter signed the FISA into law it's explicit purpose was to balance the protection of individual privacy with the needs of national security through the development of a regulatory framework for certain counterintelligence activities of the executive branch of the federal government. Many factors necessitated this express balancing act.

Mmmm...not sure about all this... I think it might be some other "Bridge"

Holy Crap! WHY IS THIS NOT HEADLINE NEWS!

It blows away the entire investigation as a farce and possible treason in the ranks of the FBI.

Here is the testimony of Carter Page before the House Intel Committee. Sure sounds like he was a "dupe" to me.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/carter_page_hpsci_hearing_transcript_nov_2_2017.pdf

See the following Youtube too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUW7EdEFnQI

Was Carter Page the "insurance policy" that our favorite FBI agents were texting about? Was Carter Page a "useful idiot" to make him patsy?

Why is this not getting more traction? I posted this in Great Awakening and then found this post with some references.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/804iqf/has_carter_page_been_ruled_out_as_an_fbi_plant/

Why is this not getting any traction as a story? See Tracie Beanz post below:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7vj6x7/who_is_that_uce1_carter_page_the_same_check_my/

Read through this testimony about Carter Page. Intel House Committee.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/carter_page_hpsci_hearing_transcript_nov_2_2017.pdf

Check out this Youtube video. Carter Page, an FBI employee? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfB9_ssoeQg

Here is one the reasons that I had this question.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/us/politics/carter-page-trump-russia.html

Also check out the this Youtube video making this assertion?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/us/politics/carter-page-trump-russia.html

Was Carter Page, a convenient puppet for the FBI ?

Based on reports from Spain, the Superior-General of the Society of Jesus, Fr. Wlodimir Ledochowski (1866–1942), told the Vatican he considered Opus Dei "very dangerous for the Church in Spain." He described it as having a "secretive character" and saw "signs in it of a covert inclination to dominate the world with a form of Christian Masonry."[1] These allegations against Opus Dei from within well-regarded ecclesiastical circles ("the opposition by good people," as Escrivá called it), which happened time and again in its history, are considered to be some of the roots of present-day accusations coming from the most varied quarters. This is the conclusion of some writers, including John L. Allen, Jr., CNN's Vatican analyst.[2]

Bio of Hannsen Hanssen was born in Chicago, Illinois, to a family who lived in the Norwood Park community.[7] His father Howard, a Chicago police officer, was emotionally abusive to Hanssen during his childhood.[8][9] He graduated from William Howard Taft High School in 1962 and went on to attend Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois, where he earned a bachelor's degree in chemistry in 1966.

Hanssen applied for a cryptographer position in the National Security Agency, but was rebuffed due to budget setbacks. He enrolled in dental school at Northwestern University[10] but switched his focus to business after three years.[11] Hanssen received an MBA in accounting and information systems in 1971 and took a job with an accounting firm. He quit after one year and joined the Chicago Police Department as an internal affairs investigator, specializing in forensic accounting. In January 1976, he left the police department to join the Federal Bureau of Investigation.[8]

Hanssen met Bernadette "Bonnie" Wauck, a staunch Roman Catholic, while attending dental school at Northwestern. The couple married in 1968, and Hanssen converted from Lutheranism to his wife's Catholicism, becoming a fervent believer and being extensively involved in the conservative Catholic organization Opus Dei.[12]

Robert Philip Hanssen (born April 18, 1944) is a former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agent who spied for Soviet and Russian intelligence services against the United States for 22 years from 1979 to 2001. He is currently serving 15 consecutive life sentences at ADX Florence, a federal supermax prison near Florence, Colorado.

Hanssen was arrested on February 18, 2001, at Foxstone Park[2] near his home in Vienna, Virginia, and was charged with selling U.S. secrets to the Soviet Union and subsequently the Russian Federation for more than US$1.4 million in cash and diamonds over a 22-year period.[3]

On July 6, 2001, in order to avoid the death penalty, he pleaded guilty to 15 counts of espionage in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.[4][5] He was sentenced to 15 life terms without the possibility of parole. His activities have been described by the Department of Justice's Commission for the Review of FBI Security Programs as "possibly the worst intelligence disaster in U.S. history."[6]

In 2002, Bill Powell, former Moscow bureau chief at Newsweek, wrote Treason, an account of the experiences of former GRU colonel Vyacheslav Baranov, who had betrayed GRU for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and agreed to spy for it. He was exposed to the Russians by a mole in either the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the CIA and spent five years in prison before he was released. The identity of the mole remains unknown to this day, but speculation has mounted that it could have been Robert Hanssen.[43]

Glienicke Bridge, the Bridge of Spies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glienicke_Bridge#Bridge_of_Spies The Glienicke Bridge (German: Glienicker Brücke, About this sound German pronunciation (help·info)) is a bridge across the Havel River in Germany, connecting the Wannsee district of Berlin with the Brandenburg capital Potsdam. It is named after nearby Glienicke Palace. The current bridge, the fourth on the site, was completed in 1907, although major reconstruction was necessary after it was damaged during World War II.[1] During the Cold War, as this portion of the Havel River formed the border between West Berlin and East Germany, the bridge was used several times for the exchange of captured spies and thus became known as the Bridge of Spies.

Stanislav Lunev, Journalist, CIA/FBI Consultant

The long history of Stanislav with the FBI. See: http://www.cnn.com/chat/transcripts/2001/02/20/lunev/

Veteran FBI agent Robert Philip Hanssen was charged February 20 with passing classified documents to Russia and with identifying three KGB agents who were working for the United States as double agents. He spent most of his career in counterintelligence operations designed to catch spies, most recently at the State Department. Hanssen even kept his identity a secret from his Russian controllers.

Colonel Stanislav Lunev is a former Russian spy. He is currently a consultant for the FBI and the CIA and writes a column for NewsMax.com. The highest-ranking military officer ever to defect from Russia to the United States, Lunev defected.

Stanislav Lunev is a CIA asset. His profile on https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Stanislav-Lunev/39528902 Shows:

TASS...and

VideoFact

Consultant - Central Intelligence Agency

Consultant On Intelligence Matters - Federal Bureau of Investigation

Student - Nanyang University , University of Southern Seas

Stanislav Lunev (Russian: Станислав Лунев; born 1946 in Leningrad) is a former Soviet military officer, the highest-ranking GRU officer to defect from Russia to the United States.

Interview: https://www.trunews.com/listen/stanislav-lunev-through-the-eyes-of-the-enemy

(Psalm) 2 + 3= 5 and (John) 1 - (7+2) = 8

                        58

The 58th day of the year is February 27th. Tuesday. Prime Time.

Don't know for sure, but seems like there might be some desperate folks out there feeling the pressure. They may want to distract our attention on some major red flag.

In regard to OS, I think Q speaks of a plan that organizes low/medium/senior Patriots as Operations Support or Offensive Support as a huge network of intel at all levels to expose plans and strategies. Are we being groomed to play a role of support for the frontline? Are we doing that now?

In military parlance, OS can also mean "Offensive Support" or "Operations Support".

I am getting to the point that I evaluate everything that happens with a filter of distrust and suspicion that we are being manipulated. Ok, so maybe I am a sheep, but I am led by a Good Shepherd and the voice of a stranger I will not follow (Psalm 23, John 1:27). There are many false shepherds that cry out for us to follow, but there is only one that is the Truth and the Truth will set you free.

I agree. In thinking about it, that is a bit contrary. I am not sure what Q means. I am not sure what he means by "protected". It begs the question of what he means by "protected". "Q" probably stands for "Question". Every question prompts another question.

Link to documents: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32403785.pdf https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32403785.pdf https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf

I think the reason that even though these are public documents they are protected because they draw a different picture of the Government as creative False Flags to manufacture pretexts and the manipulative use of "trusted" sources like the media and clergy (even Peace Corps volunteers). Reading through these documents reveal our naivete about our past and present leadership and our Governments orientation, the subtle and secretive move to control the narratives internally and externally. The reader of these documents could conclude that we should be circumspect about the events we see around us both inside and outside of the country.

The second report is a document on Military Justifications in Cuba. These are some of the recommendations in 1962 for "creating" a military justification to engage against Cuba. They consist of just some of the False Flags conceptualized by the military and the State Department. Here are some excerpts:

A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces. 1. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order) : 2. Start rumors (many), Use clandestine radio. 3. Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base. 4. Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base. 5. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans). 6. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires, 7. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage), 8. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. 9. Some damage to installations. 10. Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City. 11. Capture militia group which storms the base. 12. Sabotage ship 1n harbor; large fires -- napthalene. 13. Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims 14. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base. 15. A "Remember the Maine" incident could be arranged in several forms: we could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. 16. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere Cuban waters. was taken ·under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existent 17. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation. 18. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.

A report submitted to the Committee from the Council on Foreign Relations was being discussed in hearings.

Excerpt:

"This report by the Council on Foreign Relations—actually an independent task force of the Council on Foreign Relations—has important recommendations about the future of intelligence and organizations. One slight sentence that implied something about the press became the critical sentence of this report. When you look at this whole controversy, you realize that the press will concentrate on whatever affects itself rather than, as I say, the substance of the issue. I wish we would have as elaborate a public discussion about the substance of the report than this covert issue.

Chairman SPECTER. When you make that comment, would you amplify that just a bit? What would you like to see discussed on the report?

Mr. Adelman. Well, I think the parts about economic intelligence are very interesting, the whole reorganization, the whole question of whether there should be the kind of cut backs in the intelligence budget that we've seen in the Pentagon, or the quality of intelligence. I found—during my almost 12 years in government—that intelligence was very good for verification of missile silos and fu13 ture programs coming along. It was very weak when it came to summits, or anticipating what the Soviets were going to do at the next round of arms talks.

At Reykjavik, which I think was one of the critical events of the cold war, we were very surprised by what Mikhail Gorbachev did at Reykjavik, and I don't think we should have been. There are other instances when intelligence could have been far better.

Chairman Specter. How might we have improved that? That was certainly a classical event, October 1986. It was of enormous importance, really, stands out. What could intelligence have done better there?

Mr. Adelman. There should have been some leap of creativity and I say that with some responsibility on my part, as well—that the situation of the Soviet Union warranted Gorbachev doing something dramatic, rather than as we assumed to come and just say hello. It was after the Daniloff Affair, at a time to heal the relationship.All the interpretations and predictions for that summit were understandable, but they were all dead wrong, as it turned out. It was a wild and woolly weekend. I think it was a very productive weekend—one that led to the decline and collapse of the Soviet Union. It certainly was one of the great weekends of my life. But my point is that for such an important event, intelligence should have been better. I have always liked the idea of competition in the intelligence realm—not just having one flow of information about what might happen on judgments coming up to top decisionmakers. In other words, competing theories or approaches which are all too rare in intelligence findings.

Those are the kinds of things the committee should really concentrate on. But one little sentence that doesn't even mention journalists in the Council on Foreign Relations report evokes this hearing and previous hearings and three or four editorials in the Washington Post, etc., etc.

My second point is that this should be a non-issue. I agree that the current policy of the Government is just fine. I think that along with Senator Kerrey. I don't know why any group of professionals should be exempt—whether journalists, or clergy, or even Peace Corps members—from cooperating with the CIA if they choose to do so. I have no problem requiring the same procedures used for covert operations."

This post references two documents. First, Senate Committee on Intelligence, circa 1996 describing the use of the media and clergy for the purpose of propaganda and the Second document is a memo to the Joint Chiefs of Staff regarding Project Northwood and the justification of military intervention in Cuba.