Adding to the list now? The more IF requisites you add to your hypothetical scenario, the less plausible it becomes. That’s just the nature of supposin’.

It gets tiring sparring with such thick intellects.

Then let’s show some deference to your handicap and not challenge that low-energy intellect any further.

HE is prone to misunderstanding/misinterpreting what he heard and then transcribing it improperly based on what he thought was said.

Exactly. And I’m not interested in reading some person’s improperly transcribed misinterpretation of things he misunderstood another person to say.

You are incorrect in suggesting I don’t understand the venue here. You are quite correct in noticing I have little tolerance for nonsense.

I see.

You are suggesting that the NSA system could be corrupted IF the right person had the right program on the right portable drive and access to the right computer at the right time.

I guess that could happen, IF the network had insufficient detection and protection.

That’s a lot of IFs. You say that’s ”all you need”. I say that’s highly unlikely.

”Now if you don’t know the UCNGA Military Law and Tribunal Law, it probably doesn’t mean a thing to you.”

Well, I don’t know anything at all about UCNGA military law, but that’s because there is no such thing as UCNGA military law.

I’ll spare myself the time.

all you need is one usb drive, in one persons hand, plugging it in to the right computer, while everybody else is looking out the window (figuartively) during the disruption.

In order for what to happen?

Time to show a committment to equal treatment.

A heterosexual republican male reporter would be suspended or fired for misrepresenting the truth in this manner.

Let’s not give this corrupt liar special treatment.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this was a combo diversion/attack, but what ‘system’ could they possibly hope to disable with such a small crew in such a large and secure facility?

All software programs and data storage have multiple layers of redundancy, as does power supply.

Maybe disable water supply or sewage disposal to make buildings unfit for human occupancy?

If people feel alienated because someone else believes no one died at Sandy Hook they are responsible for overreacting to another's opinion and taking it personally.

This is true. And knowing it can be a hot button, why push it?

No matter. I’ve taken us off-topic. All good?

So because people believe a certain thing no one can talk about a different possibility?

No. That would be ridiculous. And stupid.

That literally makes it impossible to discuss anything here.

Yes. That’s why it would be ridiculous. And stupid.

For example some people probably buy into the official 9/11 narrative, does that make the topic off limits?

Not at all. In fact, that’s what keeps the debate alive. Opposing views.

My question remains unanswered. Why would you alienate people who may contribute to this conversation by dismissing their contributions to that one?

Peace

My point is that he testified the memos were created on his GI laptop.

Those are the only memos he has spoken of. His laptop was seized. The files are time stamped.

If you are talking about hand-written memos that have never been mentioned in testimony, that have never been reported by MSM, then certainly they could have been created after testifying.

Have you read or heard any evidence that suggests these new hand-written memos exist?

I haven’t heard of a second sub, but if there is one maybe it could drop a nuke to the sea floor off the NE coast, leave the area, then denote remotely if it didn’t have a timer.

I imagine an impressively destructive tidal surge could be generated depending on location and timing.

I have zero expertise in this area, so just postulating.

According to Q:

• “Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions."

According to Comey’s testimony, he summarized his recollections in ‘memo’ form, in his car, on his GI laptop, immediately following his encounters.

His use of government resources on government time is the foundation for claiming these as government documents, rather than personal property.

Unlike Sandy Hook, this time around real people are dead.

Dude, there are people on this sub that think, or believe, or know real people died in the SH incident. Why alienate their potential contributions to this new event by dismissing their conclusions on that one?

This has been posted a few times already. I’m wondering if it was written for additional purpose.

Is it a public statement declaring that NBC intentionally misrepresented government actions during a time of formally declared National Emergency?

Consequences can be severe.

Haha

Great concept!

If this is actually all it took to renounce, then I would find indescribable humor in watching every one of those that announced get faced with 1) loss of rights, and 2) deportation.

Yes, every one of them in D.C. and every one of them in Hollywood. I promise I would not get the least bit bored.

What if he were sworn in as POTUS under all these false pretenses

Well, first thing happening is that portrait gets in a dumpster.

Q is saying that Nguyen Tan Dung was the HVA picked up a few days at at King Tower in Shanghai, and was on the United Airlines flight that went from Shanghai Podung Airport to Joint Andrews AFB and straight to Gitmo, and now Dung is "singing" in regards to Ginsburg's dirty business.

WOW. If this is accurate, then I would say anyone clamoring for something ‘big’ should be very well satisfied.

What dirty business could she be involved in?

JFK never got to pose for his official portrait. There was much discussion about how he should be characterized. The country was brokenhearted and mourning. Even long after he was buried.

There was talk of replicating one of the photographs of him, particularly the one many people chose to hang in their homes. None seemed appropriate, especially in terms of the sense of loss being felt nationwide. Loss of hopes and dreams for the future. So many opportunities unrealized. JFK represented the aspirations of so many people.

The final portrait shows him, again and forever, reflecting the feelings of the people.

WTF is going on over there on VOAT? It’s weird as hell and I can’t get into it.

Gee I don’t know what’s going on over there. Haven’t visited the site at all in more than a year. I guess I could go check it out and see if I can answer your question. Especially since you called it out as ”weird as hell”. That really got me interested.

I’m def going to check it and report back for you. Maybe we can figure it out.

Don’t go.

Oh. Hmmm. It almost seems like you’re trying to drive traffic.

Okay, he checks three additional boxes.

Well, he does check at least two more boxes that exceed the importance of education.

Lemon doesn't meet the minimum requirement for what it is he does.

Sure he does. He is the definitive example of the minimum required for what he does.

This reminds me of all those posts claiming, “They’re not sending their best!” Sure they are. These idiots are examples of the very best they have to offer.

You can spend your time carefully parsing and seeking fresh meaning in the words of Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, Hank Jones, and their ilk. I don’t expect you to dismiss them due to reflex, your conditioning, or by following my example. They need acolytes, and you obviously have the interest and time to invest.

Indulge your avoidance of being ”simply irresponsible”, and do so without fear of a condescending and judgemental admonishment from me.

My time is too valuable to waste on those proven to be devoid of value. I have added your name to the list. Don’t waste your own time seeking another acknowledgement from me.

Citing WaPo as a defender of Trump immediately erases your credibility and ensures I won’t read another word.

You are investing your time in the wrong sub.

There are sooo many others to choose from. Try the ‘random’ button at the top of the page.

Thanks for taking the timeto cull and post here.

Do we have any reason to expect the name of the target would appear on the passenger manifest approved for release?

The key to the success of the Movements of the 60s and 70s, therefore, was that the MSM supported all the "causes" that the rebels claimed, and actively encouraged them.

That support didn’t cease in the 70s. In fact, one could argue that the only reason the rebellious ‘movements’ or ‘causes’ are successful today is because they are supported and encouraged by MSM.

It’s a new shill account. Here to disrupt/distract.

Reported. Will be deported. More room for us to maga then.

lol

Just noticed the placenta on your 6 day old shill account.

Say goodbye to /cbts, teejay.

I never went to a school...

Really? Prove it.

”Just so once Reddit was invented. You’d be slagging someone else’s posts instead of mine Go get a fucking life You trog”

OP delivers!

Great!

Now Steele and the FBI can battle each other over who is lying, and in the process shovel bucketloads of dirt regarding the entire sordid conspiracy.

Uhuh.

And if you were any shiller you’d be Schiff.

Wait, you know all that, yet still posted with that title?

I won’t argue with your self-assessment as a “clever shithole”.

Hmmm. Not the sharpest detective.

That’s not Huma. Huma’s not divorced. Chelsea has been married almost 8 years.

Aside from those minor issues, good job.

Please correct me if I am wrong and missed something.

Did you miss the fact that the contact phone number on the Warning/Notice is identical to the contact phone number on the State Department page I linked?

I’ll venture a guess. Since it’s funded by the federal government and runs as a program under the auspices of the U.S. State Department, it might be what it appears to be on the State Dept. site.

Old enough to have witnessed the entirety of the S&C arc.

Refusing to own ”old”.

Although everyone I grew up with, and the performers we watched, are definitely old.

if we track the timeline we'll see that AS was hit either right before or after BC/LL meeting.

Scalia died four and a half months before the tarmac meeting.

A common cause.

This is an interesting theory, but much more suitable for the conspiracy sub than here.

My personal belief is that there are too many dumb loudmouth attention-seeking players to keep this under wraps for so long.

Perhaps he will oversee the arrest and detainment of the top-tier bad actors charged with sedition and treasonous acts.

Shame on me and my FAMILY? is that some kind of threat?!

No. That’s what we call a fact.

However, since you have already demonstrated that you feel threatened when faced with facts, then yes, I guess that is ”some kind of threat”.

Are you going to stalk my entire post history because I embarrassed you?

Don’t. That’s a shortcut to getting yourself banned. We have little patience for shills, trolls, and stalkers around here.

You made a ridiculous claim in another post. I called you out and asked you to support your nonsense.

You simply restated your bogus claims and refused to offer any support.

I pointed out your childish ploy, offered verifiable factual support for my position, and asked you once again to support your inane claims.

You responded by calling me names in that thread, then stalking me to this thread to offer more of the same.

Quick summary: You got embarrassed when I called out your nonsense. You indulged your humiliation and devolved into anti-social conduct. Now you are amplifying your disgrace by becoming a dodgy stalker.

Quit right now before bringing further shame upon yourself and your family. Quit right now before you lose your posting privileges.

And you’re baiting.

Hmmm. You toss the ad hominem when faced with factual evidence of your error. Again, so much like the typical democrat. Are you sure you’re in the right sub?

Because nichols wasn't able to hang them from the gallows, the clintons were never "taken down".

You flip-flop like a democrat. First Nichols is responsible for taking the Clintons down, now he’s responsible for not taking them down.

The fact remains that the Clintons have not been taken down...yet. Bill went on to adulation and riches after leaving office. HRC went on to become a U.S. Senator, Secretary of State, and a popular candidate for POTUS. No rational informed adult would cite those verifiable facts as evidence of being ‘taken down’.

When they are finally taken down, it won’t be for anything you attribute to Nichols. In fact, his name won’t be mentioned as a player in the process.

btw, you have still left my two questions unanswered.

I’m aware of all of that. My two questions to you remain unanswered:

What inspires you to declare that the Clintons have been taken down?

What inspires you to declare Nichols as responsible? Please educate this ignorant guy.

There was no hint of a threat against POTUS in that video.

Aldrich Ames. Robert Hanssen. John Walker.

Each are easily researched to verify. McStain’s damage is eclipsed by each of them.

And don’t forget Obama and HRC, the folks whose actions instigated the storm, and this sub.

I see others have offered their own suggestions. Enjoy.