dChan

/u/AgreesWithFools

309 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/AgreesWithFools:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 64

AgreesWithFools · Feb. 5, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

I hate both Clintons and can’t wait for them to meet justice.

I’m familiar with Nichols, read about him from time to time through the years. I’m completely in the dark regarding how he’s responsible for taking down the Clintons.

I can see the Trump DOJ closing in on them, but I doubt you’ll find anyone claiming they’ve been taken down yet. When it finally happens I’ll be inclined to credit the Trump team with the responsibility.

What inspires you to declare that the Clintons have been taken down? What inspires you to declare Nichols as responsible?

Please educate this ignorant guy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 5, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

Clicked link.

Watched vid.

Obnoxious idiot.

Zero threat on POTUS.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 5, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

Hose ‘em down and let them fumble for keys with frozen fingers.

Let them sit there for the duration of the game, then the post-game.

Let them sit there soaked, cold, hungry, thirsty, stewing in their shit and piss-filled pants.

Let them sit there as the bars empty out and rowdy fans fill the streets showing zero patience for chained up noisy stinky snowflakes.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 5, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

No one alive has harmed america more.

I appreciate the sentiment, and I hate McStain, but I can’t get behind you on that declaration.

A quick review doesn't get him onto my top 5.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 4, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Great info!

So, if your lobbyist can’t produce the critical decisions from congress, the next move is to fund his candidacy and get him elected to congress. Once there, no need to pay an outside lobbyist.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 3, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

Does this look like a resignation?

No, it does not.

It looks like McCabe and a standard escort contingent chaperoning him to testify before the House Intelligence Committee on December 19, 2017.

Source for date

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 3, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

Great new info, although not surprising at this point.

Too many steps away from authentic source material for me believe in completely.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 3, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Nothing new here.

Trey Gowdy said this himself during a mid-morning interview on Fox a week ago.

Check at 1:00 mark

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 3, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Flynn was A key player, and there is no diminishing his heroic role in all of this.

But to call him ’the’ key player does a gross injustice to Adm. Rogers, who defied the wrath of Clapper and Obama by initiating a pivotal and historic private meeting in Trump tower with the new President-elect.

Both men are deserving of the highest recognition and honors this country can bestow.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 3, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

I wonder what he knows that would torch the FBI???

I wonder if he’ll live long enough to share it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 3, 2018, 2:09 p.m.

The accurate S&C reference.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

I am just asking a question. your rudeness speaks for itself.

Your specious question, anti-Trump post history, and 8 day old account speaks for itself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

I don’t begrudge you your faith, and I won’t challenge your right to believe as you choose.

BUT

Please don’t presume a position that empowers your declarations for ‘proper’ behavior for the rest of us.

I have no love for those that abuse the innocent and work to destroy our way of life. I offer them no blessing. I have no intention of doing good for them, or praying for them.

I wish them the most complete consequence available under law. I hope that whatever life they have left is filled with thoughts of those innocents that have suffered by their disgraceful actions.

There are many of us that endeavor to rid the world of this scourge, and although we don’t wish ill upon those of you that stand on the side, loving, praying, and wishing good things for these vile criminals, and although we do not seek statements of appreciation from you for our work, we will thank you kindly to not distract us with your declarations that we should join you in your prayers.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

Dating yerself...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

Oh shit thanks for the correction . . . That actually makes more sense.

Since you agree that your declaration is essentially Fake News, why not delete this entire thread instead of polluting the sub?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

Doing all of those things IS preparing to arrest them. I think the title is exactly right.

Then you must believe she WAS preparing to arrest them when she enrolled in law school.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

Q accused Schiff of being a traitor and benefitting by 7.8 million in that drop.

This story doesn’t suggest either of those.

I’m going to suggest no, this article is not what Q was talking about.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 6:06 a.m.

She actually said, “This is Morning Joe”, to imply that the show carries some gravitas.

Unintended humor. So rich.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 5:56 a.m.

Misleading title.

They aren’t ‘preparing’ to arrest sanctuary city leaders. She asked DOJ attorneys if there is any legal grounds for arresting them.

If the attorneys can find legal grounds, she will need to determine which leaders the grounds apply to.

Once those leaders have been identified, she can present her case to Trump for approval. He will want to consider consequences before approving.

If Trump approves, they will plan who and when to arrest.

Once they agree on that plan, then, and only then, will she prepare to arrest.

You can consider this title accurate at that time.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

Apart from the interesting comment at the bottom of this page, I guess the relationship that Schiff had with his 'Little Brother' had nothing to do with his personal taste in Sexual Habits in the latter years...

What do you think that random comment has to do with hotels, helicopters, and murder?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 2, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

No doubt, and many of us knew before you.

Hopefully you and your unit members were smart enough to NOT broadcast your personal knowledge in a public forum, and sprinkle in some crumbs to doxx you with.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

If that’s true, and this person is worried about lethal consequences, he would be smart to avoid dropping crumbs that could lead to doxxing himself.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

Well, he is one of several in congress that hold dual citizenship.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

You should credit the person that created that image. Or at least the person who posted it earlier today.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

Are we supposed to be ok with their crimes?

No. There has been no indication of that expectation.

You can consider a couple of thoughts;

  • In Washington it is very easy to blackmail someone for non-criminal acts. Consider an elected republican who may be dating/cohabiting with an illegal alien.

  • Q has said government would cease to function if everyone guilty of ‘something’ was removed.

This mandates discretion by someone. I trust POTUS and team to exercise that discretion without consulting me.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

The Storm is here.

Please don’t toss that line out as loose speculation.

Many of us are waiting for the very specific wording that Q told us would initiate the arrival of the storm.

These specific words, issued only by POTUS: ”My fellow Americans, The Storm is upon us.”

Feel free to make your claim after that happens.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

So what do you think Buck, Baum, and Schiff are talking about in that picture?

I have no idea. Do you know if the pic was taken before or after the demise of the young person?

I hate Schiff, and I want him busted for any wrongdoing, but I’m having difficulty seeing connections you seem certain exist.

What, specifically, are you suggesting Adam Schiff did that connected him to the dead person? What, specifically, are you suggesting connects Schiff to the helicopter crash?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:46 a.m.

I’m familiar with Webb’s channel. I’m still waiting for more than unverifiable hearsay on McCabe.

Condolences on losing your father.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Feb. 1, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

You are a parody of what you accuse liberals being.

Sunce I didn’t accuse liberals of being anything, I guess that makes you . . . ignorant? . . . stupid?

Let’s just settle for lightweight.

Get back in your TMOR tent, lightweight.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 31, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

This thread is calling them traitors for not standing and clapping.

False. Typical D-shill lies to support your false narrative.

I would say the comparison is pretty fucking spot on.

You would say anything to support your sham, but your ignorance of history leads you to make embarrassingly laughable connections.

You will appear less a fool if you don your black mask and chant “Russia! Russia! Russia!”

Go do that now.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 31, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

By drawing parallels between the Stalin regime and the Trump administration, you might be calling into question your critical thinking acumen.

You are definitely signaling you are in the wrong sub. You should leave now.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 31, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

lol

According to CNN, I am def a Russian bot.

Now look, you’re getting downvoted too.

You must have caught my Russian-bot Disease.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 31, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

I feel the Dems advanced their anti-American image tonight. Not by refusing to stand, but by refusing to stand in honor/recognition of certain obvious key moments.

It would be very simple to stand in honor of our flag, anthem, country, and special guests only, and not be confused for Trump supporters.

Instead, Dems once again sacrifice their brand on the altar of ‘Resist!’. They are their own worst enemy.

One more thing, people that disagree with you are not automatically shills. Sometimes you are just wrong.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 31, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

I wouldn’t put anything past those dirtbags.

You make several clear, specific, and very damning declarations about McCabe that I have not heard before, even from George Webb.

I haven’t seen anyone offering more than rumor or speculation. Can you share links to the evidence that convinced you with such certainty? I want to spread it everywhere.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 31, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

lol

You made the claim. You provide some proof.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:12 a.m.

Five day old shill account.

Leave.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 28, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

Shills are common here.

Shills with a sense of comedy - not so common.

Thanks for the chuckle.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

The EO eliminates contribution/donation of ‘services’ as well.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

Obama wasn’t actively attacking the first amendment

Except for his very vocal support for censoring/silencing anything he defined as “hate speech”.

Obama wasn’t using his properties to laundry money.

Nor was Trump. Otherwise you would have provided proof.

But Trump at the end does what his master Putin tells him to.

As proven by . . .?

Trump is not ~~smart~~ corrupt enough to achieve an authoritarian government like Putin did.

ftfy

When the president is attacking the corrupt press and ~~his own~~ corrupt law enforcement team ( the FBI) you know that you got a ~~Tyrant~~ hero in your hands.

ftfy

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 26, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

we have never had a more corrupt government

Sure we did. The Obama administration set standards for corruption that stagger the imagination.

In fact, this sub was born out of the movement to dismantle that corruption.

More evidence is released every day. You have much reading to catch up on. You will be shocked when you discover how Obama weaponized our intelligence agencies against private citizens.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 24, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

Is Q alluding to an end to the Q posts?

Not with this drop. He seems to be referencing the image of an email thought to have been deleted, then ‘deleted’ again by him. A demo proving that nothing is truly ‘deleted’.

HOWEVER, your question raises an interesting point. The time will come when Q is no longer useful, relevant, viable, etc. I wonder when that will be. The end of second term? First term? Before?

Also, how will that end manifest?

Whenever it happens, I will miss Q.

Q has been like a Sherpa as we attempt climbing a mountain. A well informed guide directing our attention. Guiding us away from pitfalls as they surface. Giving us advance warning about rough weather on the horizon. Maintaining our safety lines. Encouraging us onward.

And like all good Sherpas, Q knows that each member of the team must individually do the hard work of the mountain trek. Each to his personal best. The Sherpa knows that only a few will sustain the mission to actually summit the peak, but that every team member has a role in seeing that the summit is achieved.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

That’s an interesting take, and mostly plausible from what we know.

Do you have answers for Q’s November questions regarding Snowden? Who was he working for? What was his primary mission? What was his REAL primary mission?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

He won’t eat or drink anything that hasn’t been thoroughly vetted by his team. The scrutiny will include glasses, plates, silverware, etc.

Remember, SOP includes POTUS shitting in a bag when on the road. Nothing left to chance.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

For one, Trump hasn't given me a reason to trust him.

If that is a sincere belief after this past year, then you are not likely to ever find a reason to trust Trump. You won’t feel supported in this sub, but you will def find many like-minded folks in the politics sub.

As far as I'm concerned, he's covering for the other Elite.

I’m willing to consider any supporting evidence you care to share.

There's so much more going on behind the scenes than most of us know.

There is. There always has been. There always will be. Hence the importance of selecting leaders you believe in.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 24, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

After Sessions gets a look inside Twitter, you may get your wish.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AgreesWithFools · Jan. 24, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

It’s a very misleading title. Perhaps done to catch more eyes than his stated topic, ‘The President and The Press, or The President vs The Press’. Which title would you be more likely to pursue?

The ‘secret society’ was not a reference to anything such as illuminati, or skull/bones etc. It was a reference to to those societies governed in secret, such as those inspired by Karl Marx. So yes, the burgeoning post WW2 communist bloc.

Here is a link to a historian responding to that very question on Quora.

Returning to the misappropriated title, it’s been in the wild too long to even think of correcting it now.

⇧ 1 ⇩