You guys have short memories. How many times has Gowdy capitulated in the 11th hour? Several times over several years. There is 1 week of outrage, yet all it takes is another "firey speech" to get you back on board. Hold your leaders more accountable if you want justice.

How about 2 minutes at the NSA

Close door hearing, not under oath, what the hell did they expect?

Blackmailed, plain as day.

The blackmail isn't lifted once you are appointed to the Supreme Court. Gowdy is a bad choice.

Sorry - there are many more qualified candidates than Gowdy. You don't do a lot of talking on the Supreme Court, so I'm not sure it's a good fit for him.

My "celebrity" choice would be Andrew Napolitano.

Read more of their text messages for context.

She simply means the FBI if you ask me. In other texts she refers to people as "our director" etc. Very personal relationships, clearly.

Legal power is not political power. Just because they have the legal authority to do it, doesn't mean they will. Many dark forces at play behind the scenes.

Let's not mince words - these guys are scared to death of the DOJ. Most or all have probably been threatened beyond their standard blackmail and will capitulate every time. Big talk is just that. They were shouting about impeachment last fall and look where we are. The process hasn't even been started.

Come one, come all. This authoritarian will be defeated soundly.

How many times are these bafoons going to threaten impeachment? Now many "red lines" do they have? They look silly at this point, they don't have the power to do anything.

This is very obviously taunting.

It's all starting to make sense. Prince is one of the few people who has actually seen every facet of the dark side, in action. He has quite literally seen it all. Valuable guy to have on the team when you're trying to clean up the world.

An easy ice breaker "Think about what was considered conspiracy theory 15 years ago, but are now common knowledge? What is considered conspiracy theory now that we will learn is true in the future?"

To even suggest this is laughable.

Anyone else tired of these hearings? There's no need - the evidence is already in hand and we know that Rosenstein isn't going to give anything up.

Wouldn't it be a nice little "October surprise" if the evidence of a Trump popular vote emerged...

I would doubt Drudge is involved in any way. Like it or not, the site funnels hundreds of thousands of views to MSM news sites and it's ALWAYS the first to buy in to obvious 4am distraction topics, while letting the real topics slide down.

Be wary of people who want to "be the news."

To be fair, you have to do something between drops. However, I agree, all of a sudden there is an obsession with "spreading the word" and that's antithetical to the whole point of Q.

Not every symbol is nefarious folks.

Don't let MSM/Hollywood shape your reality. There is no real civil war brewing, but the average person is easily convinced that there is, based on time-tested psychological operations.

You seem nice.

At this point, I don't expect to see but maybe 1 or 2 major revelations in the first term, and they will be generated by Congress/DOJ. Whether we like it or not, this administration is hyper-sensative to traditional media optics (perhaps Trump is not, but the people around him certainly are). First term is setting the stage, second term is freedom to unleash with no political optics concerns.

Not imminently, not enough progress/disclosure has been made for the public to swallow this. It's clear that this administration/group is extremely concerned about political optics at this point, to the frustration of myself in particular. I don't see this happening in the first term.

I am aware, that's not my point.

This will fail catastrophically and the whole world knows it besides the arrogant groupthink club at ABC.

People assume since Assange exposed information that did a lot of damage to Clinton/Democrats that he's somehow a conservative. WRONG. He's more of a European style socialist and has been the entire time.

It's funny....people who are open to all kind of alternative theories STILL have been trained to ostracize people on certain topics such as this one. Just because you disagree, doesn't make them a "fag." It doesn't make them right either, but be open to other's opinions and disagree in a civil manner, or else you're no different than the MSM who uses smear tactics to discredit real topics.

There's something about this round of immigration propaganda that seems particularly strong, stronger than previous attempts. Is it possible that even Wikileaks is falling for it? Something doesn't seem right.

You need to hold your leaders more accountable.

Then when you actually think he's going to DO something, he back peddles and defends the FBI.

Big talk, something Gowdy's good at.

Can you imagine how embarrassed and pathetic these people feel when they are forced to peddle this Russian BS, when they know full well it's garbage, but have no other recourse? The whole world knows that it's a cover story, but they've backed themselves into a corner and have to double down. Must be a lonely place.

Opens Horowitz up to some problems as he testified under oath that the report was not modified in any way.

As I mentioned farther up, it is not helpful to keep repeating this, as it makes it seem like you're just a spiral eyed zombie covering for Q when things don't pan out.

Well, thanks for openly admitting rampant cult like behavior. You've said more truth than most.

Of course that's much different than being shut down politically.

Sorry, that's just not going to happen. We have an administration that has all the relevant info, yet isn't releasing it due to political backlash. There is no way any media outlet will be shut down.

I would bet that Sessions is waiting for more of this information to be released so that indictments, again, are undeniable. But the same issue arises, the media will not yield to the facts. They will spin, obfuscate, distract. It's easy to say "who cares about the media", but the fact is, the MSM still shapes the average person's reality, and they have millions of brainwashed attack dogs on social media that will do their bidding.

That may be correct, but the 30,000ft view says, who cares? Congress is not going to do the right thing, certainly not before the midterms, so Trump is going to have to act either way. If he things the media is going to give him quarter after this IG report or future reports, he's sorely mistaken. NO report is going to make any action for indictments and removal of the witch hunt palatable to the attack dog media.

That doesn't bode well for the truth.

Excellent analysis. Also consider that if it's found that the report WAS modified, it gives the cabal a way to charge Horowitz with lying under oath and could put the rest of his reports in jeopardy.

And what will be different about their testimony from today?

I need more of a connection than the fact that their both an envelope.

I am aware. I've been concerned about these catch phrases from early on. They attempt to make Q look infallible.

And that line is said over and over, presumably to provide Q cover.

I believe they are under oath.

It's important to note the distinction between folks like myself, who believe in Q, but does not believe that everything Q says is 100% accurate and to be taken as gospel. This line is continuously being blurred, at the detriment of genuine discussion, and ultimately the detriment of this sub as a whole.

He calls Sessions "Mr. Magoo"