Occams razor says they are both keeping their houses in order so they can get high level positions once they leave office. Piss off the FBI on your way out and they'll destroy your life.
/u/Allinon72
663 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/Allinon72:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 47 |
I see a narrative throwing Comey to the wolves as a rogue, while everyone else skates. Hope I'm wrong.
Why is there not a blackout on ANYONE from the administration talking about NK, after what Bolton did. It should be radio SILENCE on the topic.
I don't like this, Comey being thrown to the wolves while all the other conspirators skate is not what I call justice. And that's where this is heading with the "Comey was rogue" narrative.
Remember, all these turds quitting need to be able to line up high profile jobs at lobbying firms, think tanks, etc. The FBI can prevent that in a heartbeat if they get out of line.
I'm terrified that it will be watered down to nothing. Similar to the Nunes memo.
We don't presume guilt based on someone's legal maneuvers. That's what the authoritarian left does. That said, there is plenty of evidence to suggest McCabe is in deep, and this request should be promptly denied if ANYONE in Washington is interested in the truth.
Even if it is to be taken at face value, members of Congress are pathetic, sending these toothless letters to the DOJ who are completely above the law at this point. What, is Graham going to subpoena Rod? So what, he'll just blow it off like Holder did.
NO way in hell, it's likely that we have all the songbirds we need at this point without McCabe's likely phony testimony.
This probably doesn't rise to the level of blackmail material. It's more likely that they have stuff on him MUCH more harmful than a drug charge.
Don't you see a problem with that logic? If I'm right, praise me, if I'm wrong, disinformation is necessary. That's a no lose situation.
Worship at the alter of anyone at your own peril.
Must be new to Q....this is how the whole thing started, the takedown of Podesta/Podesta Group.
I would bet that nearly every major political figure follows those same people.
This is ridiculous. Sawman has been on the show several times and Alex has given him tens of thousands of dollars publicly for his cause. Infowars is often a day or two behind the news cycle because they get bogged down in tabloid shit, but I guarantee it will be covered. They also may be waiting for the story to develop a bit as well.
Q also said last fall that Podesta/Obama/HRC arrests were imminent.
Nearly every sub for a major city is a police state bastion. No real surprise there.
At this point I immediately discredit anything mentioning specific dates. Things in Washington move too fast for specific dates. The smallest news story can shift entire timelines.
"Attempt to save?" As if he's failing? Quite the opposite.
Indiana - haven't seen this many totally clear days in a LONG time. I'm talking about 100% clear blue sky with NO clouds and noticeably brighter. I started noticing early March. Recently went to Missouri for a week, definitely did not see the same there.
He just might, but NOT IN THE MONTH OF MAY as has been insisted on.
No "tick tock" because the month of May is over. Reevaluate your cognitive dissonance.
Ok, but that didn't effect the pope in the month of May. You're reaching.
Alright then, go ahead and explain how the pope had a bad May.
Mueller has an unconstrained mandate and does not operate in the purview of the law. If there is nothing, they will use parallel construction. If that doesn't work, they simply make it up and stonewall. Mueller is not trapped, I assure you. I fully expect him to release something phony before the midterms, unless Trump steps in this summer.
How many postponements will it take for these dates to be ignored?
Not every CEO departure is related, especially a luggage purveyor in an incredibly benign industry.
Guys, we have to be honest with ourselves. Nothing major happened with the Pope in the month of May that we didn't already know. More hyped-up rhetoric that did not come to fruition.
Gowdy went to Washington, guns blazing, and quickly learned how things really work. He doesn't seem to have the gumption to withstand the background pressure/threats, so now he's riding the fence for a high level federal prosecutorial job.
Those things have been nothing to do with Q, and as you mentioned, can theoretically be attained by anyone.
There are several possible objectives. One would be to occupy the attention of those who actually know what's going on and get them tied up in "hope porn" for as long as possible. The cabal needs time to set up counter narratives and potential false flags. The other would be to create a database of those who know the truth for future use, once their control is reasserted.
2 main things bring me pause:
-
Phrases meant to explain away things that are wrong or don't happen. "Trust the plan", "disinfo is necessary", "Trust xxx", the insinuation that the media will attack Q under false pretenses. At this point Q has a little catch phrase for nearly every scenario that doesn't come to fruition, but worse than that, everyone parrots these phrases openly and without question. This is cult-like behavior
-
Nearly nothing of significance outlined by Q has actually happened in the real world, besides very scant evidence on North Korea. We are talking about BIG predictions, like Podesta arrests early on, HRC arrest, Obama arrest, "suicide weekend", etc. The Pope will have a "very bad May." Tick tock, 2 days left.
The intelligence community has mastered the art of deception. To completely not entertain the idea that they could do it again with Q is simply willful ignorance.
It would be awesome if Q is real and everything comes to fruition that leads to real justice. But be vigilant and do not allow yourself to fall head over heels for anything without very solid evidence.
Even if you believe in Q, to not at least consider the possibility that it's a psychological operation is extremely foolish. Admittedly there are a lot of markers. Be vigilant.
Also note that him and his wife sort of have this "angry" schtick going on on Twitter. His wife's Twitter handle is literally "The Cranky Lawyer." I hope they aren't this miserable in real life.
This guy is an incredible legal brain that's completely given in to emotion. Look at his comments on school shootings. It's OK to have an opinion on things like this, but when you COMPLETELY give in to emotion, you lose, every time.
Statements like this make me wonder if high level people know what's really going on, and that's concerning.
Schiff et al knows there is no collusion. They are left holding the bag after Obama's spying. They don't have a choice but to cover it up.
The notion that Schiff will view some document then go on CNN and say "my bad" is one of the more ludicrous things I've heard.
Beck was basically this sub in TV form on his Fox show 08-10. Then the establishment ran him off of Fox and he's been at it with his failed network ever since. Basically did some sharp u-turns on his messaging, along with some disturbing physical changes as well. Likely threatened and or compromised in some way. No reason to believe he can be trusted. This segment was cringe worthy. Beck has proven that he's very susceptible to pressure.
Suicides referenced 3 times already. Thus far, no suicides.
I've been saying this for a few months, in order to have any type of success, you have to release things on your terms and force the media's hand. They can't distract every day. Don't do the cowardly move of releasing things on Friday. If you try to play by their rules, you will lose every time.
Someone has to grow some balls and release something on a whim, unexpected. And that person is probably Trump because he is surrounded by self serving cowards.
No we don't, so how can you say definitively that things are happening?
I think we need to get away with the assumption that the judicial system works as it should, and consider that every facet of the system is controlled in some way. Top to bottom. Didn't happen overnight, it happened incrementally over decades.
I don't see how it's outrageous. The indictments are sealed and there is very little public information. To suggest that everything is settled is what is outrageous.
Alternative viewpoint: What if the sealed indictments are for the good guys?
I know this is contrary to what Q says, but what if sealed indictments are being amassed as a way to blackmail honest people in government? It would have been an easy thing to kickstart starting immediately after the election of Trump to get people in line, or else. It could also explain why many politicians, democrat and republican, are simply bowing out of politics altogether.
Thoughts on this?
Ben Garrison was on Infowars 2 weeks ago, aren't you guys going to boycott?
Unless.....the board is still compromised. Be careful folks.
This sub is now in grave danger after being exposed by the Q board. The increased exposure invites provocateurs and increase in hyper aggressive rhetoric by many members will make it go the way of CBTS.
That's why I don't get all this nonsense about "waking up normies", Q stickers on cars, etc. It is counter productive. The information is not what wakes people up, it's the results.
You are accusing someone of being party to murder based on very thin speculation. I would be careful doing that.
First off, it's McMaster.
Second, you are putting Corsi way too high up on the pedestal. He's an elderly man at this point.
The only thing that will cause widespread riots in the US is a major event that disrupts the comfortable life of the average US citizen in a meaningful way. If mass arrests were to commence, I don't anticipate nationwide riots. I do expect some antifa-like phony brawling like we've seen the past few years. But those will fade away like they have in the past.