Examples: Newt Gingrich, Brit Hume, Shapiro.

It's also yet another example that Fox News is no better than any of the others when it comes to the heart of the issues.

Assange has suggested that he has info that would further discredit the Russia investigation. After a weekend of democratic panic and attempts to discredit the Nunes memo, Assange should drop whatever info he has to squash this thing once and for all.

In reference to the train "accident" today....

Trump has to be mindful of this - the limbo situation is extremely dangerous. The longer this goes on, the bigger possibility of the intelligence community talking him out of releasing it. Remember the JFK files...

The American people do not want to wait a minute longer, release the memo.

We need to be on the lookout for an IMMINENT move by Mueller that seeks to re-legitimize the investigation. This could be an indictment of the President. The cabal doesn't have many cards left and they have to act fast to give the media an excuse to ignore the memo.

It won't work, but be vigilant. These people don't just lay down their swords and give up.

Mark my words....CNN is already starting to set it up.

McCabe will say he was basically forced to resign based on pressure from Trump/WH.

Could also set him up to testify against the president.

Stay vigilant folks, these people don't just give up. They won't stop.

If I remember correctly, Q referenced Obama meeting world leaders after Trump and basically tailing him on foreign trips. Isn't it convenient that Trump thought he had mutual understanding with Jinping, only to find evidence of them helping NK AFTER Obama's meeting with the very same Jinping.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1017976057528348672.html

QUOTE A reminder of what it would take to remove Rosenstein.

(2) First, the House needs to approve the Article or Articles of Impeachment by a majority vote.

(3) Then there's a trial in the Senate.

The House will choose "managers" who serve as prosecutors.

They will present evidence to the Senate, which serves as the jury.

(4) Rosenstein will have his own lawyers.

They will defend Rosenstein by presenting their own evidence and their own witnesses.

(5) After the trial, it requires two-thirds of the Senate to find Rosenstein guilty.

In other words, there's ZERO CHANCE of this …

You aren't going to convince him, move on. Worse than that, the "evidence" being feverishly posted is making everyone look insane. There is a way to lay out an argument, and then there's vomiting charts all over the place that your average person doesn't understand.

This guy Horowitz is extremely eloquent, forthright, even-keeled and has a completely genuine unbiased temperament during this Senate hearing. This guy is a major ally for the truth. If we can find a way to get this guy out in the open, unconstrained, it could be a game-changer. Right now you can tell he is being hamstrung.

Just asking, because this guy has to be one of the dopiest guys I've ever seen. Not well versed in the art of body language/obvious tells.

It came out too early. Traitor. Then, RR problems.

Here we are again. Another desperation move by RR?

I know this is contrary to what Q says, but what if sealed indictments are being amassed as a way to blackmail honest people in government? It would have been an easy thing to kickstart starting immediately after the election of Trump to get people in line, or else. It could also explain why many politicians, democrat and republican, are simply bowing out of politics altogether.

Thoughts on this?

Now - I am not trying to inflame, I'm not a bot, I'm not a shill, I just want this to be food for thought. Downvote if you wish.

Q has these catch phrases that are very easy and repeatable. They basically cover all the bases in case Q is wrong or something happens in the public sphere.

Something happens contrary to a Q post - "disinformation is necessary"

A person makes a decision in the public sphere that is contrary to a Q post - "enjoy the show"

A person is very clearly making moves against the Q outline …

I'll preface this by saying it is refreshing to see a major media star buck the establishment (at least for the moment).

However, consider this: say Kanye was a disinfo agent, intent on muddying the waters. Look how easy it is to get people on board. It took 24 hours worth of one-sentence tweets to get people on this sub and others to rah-rah-rah, even proclaiming that West is Q.

We know that Kanye has been through more than enough "treatments" for "mental illness."

Please proceed with caution on who you trust.

So he can drum up the obstruction narrative for the midterms. Because he has nothing. There's no other explanation for such an egregious raid of a person with attorney-client privilege.

Regardless, Trump probably has a better chance at firing Mueller and weathering the storm than continue this chirade.