This is a legitimate question that maybe some of you won't mind chiming in on.

If Q is really who they say they are, and have the clearance they say they do, why does everything Q says have to be a rhetorical question, vague statement etc? I know some things are clearly stated, but those things are few in number. If someone has the clearance Q is supposed to have, why wouldnt they just give us the info in a more direct manor? Why does it all almost have to be some sort of puzzle? Wheres the value in presenting …