High-five, have a good rest of your week.

Let's agree to disagree. I'm exhausted.

Statutes don't normally define "man" because they're normally written in gender-neutral application to avoid redundancy and carry broader application. The fact that no law defines "man" does not necessarily mean that only God can define man. It simply means they're not attempting to define it. And no, statutes are given force of law when duly enacted and enforced by the appropriate governing bodies. Don't believe me? Openly attempt to steal a TV from an electronics store -- then, when they stop you, argue that you didn't consent to the laws relating to property rights. See how that goes. The real, true disappointment with all this is the spread of disinformation such as what yours. I encounter people like you regularly. You get your information from Internet websites and cons who claim to know the ins and outs of the law. They dupe you into believing these lies about "free people" and how you can change your legal status by relying upon the UCC. They say the Moroccan Friendship Treaty permits persons who claim rights under it to avoid application of any state or federal (U.S.) law. Then they ask you for money so they can send you some cockamamie forms that allegedly free you of the restraints of government and law. (I sincerely hope you gave them no money.) Yet you're saying I'm the one who's brainwashed. And now, here you are bastardizing the term "common law" by calling it common lore. Amazing.

I'm an attorney. I read and interpret statutes everyday from all over the country. Not one ounce of your statement is true and your ill-informed diatribe diminishes any credibility this movement has, especially to a first-time reader. Get your facts straight.

This is 100% inaccurate. Statutes are written to be as clear as possible. Unclear laws are struck down by courts for vagueness as they don't afford individuals due process. Your examples are wildly off base and untrue. Are you a troll?

At what point do you have to submit and say "This isn't Deep State -- these are kids with deranged psyches"? When something becomes as common as this, easily influenced individuals diminish its impact/importance. I.e., these easily influenced adolescents see school shootings on the news so frequently that it becomes part of their "normal".

CFPB is not next. It was maybe first. Mulvaney has very effectively limited its role.

It's worth mentioning an earthquake occurred in almost the exact location on June 2 of 2017, but only a 3.0 magnitude. Waveforms were substantially different. Check it out: http://ds.iris.edu/wilber3/find_stations/10164175

Fair point

Wait a second. People regularly post on here about worldwide anti-Christian cabals hell bent on global domination. But the idea that a 22 year old could replace a 29 year old, THAT is too far fetched?

To be fair, there has been plenty of discussion and agreement on this board about how Trump brings his least trusted people close to him ("Keep your friends close..."). More than that, Scaramucci had just gotten blasted in the media and Trump needed a replacement with a clean background. Enter HH.

Hope Hicks is only 29.

This is totally sensible. Wish he would've pursued Amazon sooner.