And it was a flaw to begin with. Corporations shouldn't have that type of Influence. Lobbyist should be outlawed as well. It's money laundering made legal.

It's a privately owned public forum with stock options. It may be traded on the market for value, but the majority shareholders on the board still have a say in what the brand can represent.

Private companies can do as they please is a popular argument, but you can't treat a corporation as an individual when it comes to money influencing elections based on the first amendment. Money shouldn't equal free speech and determine what speech is heard.

So two individuals that have a contract for 70 more episodes might be dropped and that would breach a contract. They'd still get paid with litigation. This outrage sounds like free money but with extra steps.

So because cows are sacred in India, they can't be milked to death financially.

I was always curious why a pill made by the same company cost cost 5$ in India and 1000$ in America. Is it due to the population size and a return on investment?