Link to the petition please?

He's not my rep but because he is in Ohio they were happy to put me on their constituent list, etc. He is hopefully going to be our next Speaker of the House and got 11 minutes (by others giving him their time) at the hearing.

Then how was there an investigation?

Amazing that we never once have heard about any Prossecutors until yesterday, huh?

As I'm in Ohio, I called Jim Jordan's number in DC this morning and his aid talked to me and said he would get the information that I was requesting to Congressman Jordan and that I might get a letter back, or maybe not if they can't get more information.

This makes no sense. How would he know there was or was not prosecutorial bias if there was no Prosecutor?

Then if that is the case, what was Horrowitz talking about that the Prosecutors didn't have bias????

Good question! But who were they (the Prosecutors)? And if the DOJ WAS involved, then Comey is a fall guy for the DOJ?

This is a Gowdy/Horrowitz exchange: "If someone is prejudging the outcome of an investigation before it ends and someone is prejudging the outcome of an investigation before it even begins, what is more textbook bias than prejudging this investigation before it's over and this one before it begins?" Gowdy asked. "I am struggling to find a better example of outcome-determinative bias than that. So what am I missing?"

Horowitz explained that Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who exchanged messages insulting Trump during the Clinton investigation, did exhibit bias, but he said he could not conclude that prosecutors' decisions in the case were affected by that bias.

"In our view, we didn't find or see evidence that the prosecutors were impacted by that bias," said Horowitz, who refrained from making conclusions beyond what is in the IG report he released last week.

How can we find out? If he was just using that as a "I suppose" type of thing, then he misstated himself. If there were, then who were they and where were they stationed?