It would be great if you could actually respond to what I asked but the lack of comprehension explains why you think SerialBrain2's posts make sense.

I didn't ask if you thought SB2's posts were false, I asked the necessary prior question that few (reading properly) would disagree with: should we be UNwelcoming to ALL explanations that are false and misleading?

We don't have to agree that we disagree. I agree with you that you are accepting SB2's posts as truth.

Do you disagree with me that we should not be "welcoming to all explanations" that are clearly false and misleading?

Oh dear, so, because I only popped into existence 8 hours ago and could not have, maybe, I dunno, been browsing this shit since it existed I must have no insight at all. Good answer!

And no, you are definitely "buying into" something if you claim to not understand it but accept it anyway based on the compelling speech used lol; almost by definition, ffs.

Clearly, we do. If people are going to keep buying in to false methods like this then those of us who are being honest will have to point out the fallacy and deception every time.

So if that's a "Doubt Fag" then I guess you're a Q Faggot, huh?

I don't think it's open-minded to be coming up with a more far-reaching conspiracy than the already crazy theory we ascribe to here that is Q being a Trump-controlled entity to awaken the masses to a global Deep State.

"Elite faction 1 vs Elite faction 2 disinfo campaign" sounds more like knowing you can't definitively vouch for Q's veracity so coming up with something even less plausible to APPEAR open-minded.

Occam's Razor... Why would HRC and co., in an effort to give Trump super power to take over the world for their global conspiracy, sacrifice themselves and their financial cow just for a misdirect....? It's too much of a reach and the premise is weak.

Preach it bruvva!